Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bernadette M Otto Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Arts & Culture$86kHealth$60kRecreation & Sports$50kReligion$45kHuman Services$29kFood & Nutrition$22kHousing & Shelter$22kAnimals$19kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$639k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AREA COMMUNITY THEATRE INC$10,000
FIRST CONGREGATIONAL UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST$5,000
NEIGHBOR FOR NEIGHBOR INC$5,000
TOMAH CONCERT ASSOCIATION$4,000
VETERANS ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC$4,000
TOMAH AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY$3,000
VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS POST 1382$3,000
FAMILIES FIRST OF MONROE COUNTY$3,000
KINDNESS COMMUNITY INC$3,000
TOMAH AREA CANCER SUPPORT$2,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WEST CENTRAL WISCONSIN$2,000
MR ED'S COMMUNITY THANSGIVING DINNER$2,000
NORTH AMERICAN SQUIRREL ASSOCIATION$1,000
CHASING DAYLIGHT ANIMAL SHELTER INC$1,000
SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%KINDNESS COMMUNITY INC: $3k → 14%KINDNESS COMMUNITY INC: $3k → 14%KINDNESS COMMUNITY INC: $2k → 14%KINDNESS COMMUNITY INC: $1k → 14%KINDNESS COMMUNITY INC: $1k → 14%KINDNESS COMMUNITY INC: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$356k · 18 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
1

Total granted

$356k
$5k

Still filing today

61%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Public BenefitHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsHealthArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    Tomah Memorial Hospital
    5× · 2018–2022 · $50k · revenue +50%
  • AC
    AREA COMMUNITY THEATER INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $32k · revenue +61%
  • VA
    VETERANS ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $22k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • HC
    HO CHUNK MUSEUM & CULTURAL CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tomah Health Community Foundation Inc

The mission of Tomah Health Community Foundation, Inc. is to support the community of Tomah and the healthcare providers that serve its residents.

Health
2
Housing Action Coalition of Waukesha County Inc

The Housing Action Coalition brings together community resources to address the needs of Waukesha Countys most vulnerable people. The Coalition assists those in need of emergency housing, financial assistance, food and many other…

Housing & Shelter
3
Baraboo Area Homeless Shelter

Baraboo area homeless shelter works to provide shelter and comprehensive case management services to persons experiencing homelessness in baraboo, wisconsin and the surrounding area.

Housing & Shelter
4
Manitowoc County Habitat for Humanity Inc

To create decent, affordable housing for those in need

5
Dodge County Humane Society Inc

Humane society providing animal stray service and animal care including adoptions, redemptions, and surrenders for residents located in dodge county, wi and surrounding areas.

Animals
6
Humane Society of Marathon County Inc

To provide animal control services for marathon county, provides for the care of stray and unwanted animals, and provides public education concerning the safety of animals and responsible pet ownership.

Animals
7
Arnell Memorial Humane Society Inc

To promote the health and welfare of animals by providing homes, meals, and healthcare. to control the stray population and the spread of disease.

Animals
8
Tomah Youth Hockey Club Inc

To promote the sport of ice hockey and educate participants while instilling the importance of sportsmanship and fair play.

Recreation & Sports
9
Tama County Humane Society

To operate as an animal shelter by taking in stray or surrendered animals. We provide medical care and surgical care, including spaying and neutering of all animals if needed prior to adoption.

Animals
10
Vna Assisted Living Inc

Providing elderly housing and assistance to eligible clients in northeast wisconsin.

11
Neighborhood Housing Services of Southeast Wisconsin Inc

The purpose of neighborhood housing services of southeast wisconsin, inc. is to renew pride, restore confidence,promote reinvestment, and revitalize the nhs neighborhoods through the efforts of local residents acting in concert with…

Housing & Shelter
12
Humane Society of North Central Iow

Provide for shelter, food, veterinary services and adoption of small animals. this shelter operates as a no kill shelter in north central iowa.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Veterans Assistance Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Kindness Community Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CITY OF TOMAH PARKS AND RECREATION — $50,000 · OtherCITY OF TOMAH PARKS AND RECREATIONFIRST CONGREGATIONAL UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST — $45,000 · OtherFIRST CONGREGATIONAL UNITED CHURCH OF CHRISTAREA COMMUNITY THEATER INC — $32,000 · OtherAREA COMMUNITY THEATER INCTOMAH CONCERT ASSOCIATION — $29,000 · OtherTOMAH CONCERT ASSOCIATIONVETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS POST 1382 — $17,000 · OtherVETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS POST 1382NEIGHBOR FOR NEIGHBOR INC — $12,000 · OtherTOMAH AREA CANCER SUPPORT INC — $10,000 · OtherMR ED'S COMMUNITY THANSGIVING DINNER — $10,000 · OtherFAMILIES FIRST OF MONROE COUNTY INC — $8,000 · Other+4 more — $21,000 · Other+4 moreTomah Memorial Hospital — $50,000 · HealthTomah Memorial …VETERANS ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC — $22,000 · Public BenefitTOMAH AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $20,000 · Arts & CultureCHASING DAYLIGHT ANIMAL SHELTER INC — $13,000 · AnimalsKINDNESS COMMUNITY INC — $11,000 · Human ServicesBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WEST CENTRAL WIS — $11,000 · Youth Development
Other$234,000Health$50,000Public Benefit$22,000Arts & Culture$20,000Animals$13,000Human Services$11,000Youth Development$11,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTomah Memorial Hospital — $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAREA COMMUNITY THEATER INC — $32,000 over 7y, 6.8% of budgetVETERANS ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC — $22,000 over 6y, 3.2% of budgetTOMAH AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $20,000 over 8y, 5.5% of budgetCHASING DAYLIGHT ANIMAL SHELTER INC — $13,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetNEIGHBOR FOR NEIGHBOR INC — $12,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetKINDNESS COMMUNITY INC — $11,000 over 6y, 4.2% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WEST CENTRAL WIS — $11,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILIES FIRST OF MONROE COUNTY INC — $8,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetNORTH AMERICAN SQUIRREL ASSOCIATION — $6,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC — $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Tomah Memorial Hospital
  • Who funds AREA COMMUNITY THEATER INC
  • Who funds VETERANS ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds TOMAH AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds CHASING DAYLIGHT ANIMAL SHELTER INC
  • Who funds NEIGHBOR FOR NEIGHBOR INC
  • Who funds KINDNESS COMMUNITY INC
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WEST CENTRAL WIS
  • Who funds FAMILIES FIRST OF MONROE COUNTY INC
  • Who funds NORTH AMERICAN SQUIRREL ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Frank G Andres Charitable TrustWI22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Frank G Andres Charitable Trust · Thomas B Earle Foundation · The Covia Foundation · Burnstad Family Foundation Inc · Jw Etzelmueller Trust Fund · Stephen D and Betty J Gebhardt Family Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bernadette M Otto Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph