Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Thomas a and Mary E Dugan Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$712k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Recreation & Sports$578kEducation$310kHuman Services$268kArts & Culture$260kHealth$216kCrime & Legal$124kFood & Nutrition$95kHousing & Shelter$70kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $202k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $224k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$9.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TIBBETTS ALL ABILITY PARK FOUNDATION$250,000
FARMINGTON MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC$100,000
SAN JUAN COLLEGE FOUNDATION$67,000
DURANGO EARLY LEARNING CENTER$57,000
UNDERGROUND BOOKS LITERARY ARTS FOUNDATION$25,000
ADVOT$25,000
DURANGO CAFE AU PLAY$25,000
ECONOMIC COUNCIL HELPING OTHERS INC$25,000
DONORSCHOOSE$20,160
EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE INC$20,000
IGW CHILDRENS HOPE FOUNDATION INC$12,000
MASADA HOUSE INC$10,000
INSPIRE HEART INC$10,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO$10,000
MEALS ON WHEELS NEW MEXICO$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $241k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS: $5k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO: $10k → 23%KIDSPEACE NATIONAL CENTERS OF GEORGIA: $5k → 11%PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS: $5k → 14%ECONOMIC COUNCIL HELPING OTHERS INC (ECHO): $12k → 14%ECONOMIC COUNCIL HELPING OTHERS INC: $25k → 22%ECHO FOOD BANK: $15k → 22%PEOPLE ASSISTING THE HOMELESS: $12k → 22%PEOPLE ASSISTING THE HOMELESS: $12k → 22%PEOPLE ASSISTING THE HOMELESS: $12k → 22%PEOPLE ASSISTING THE HOMELESS: $12k → 22%ECHO FOOD BANK: $10k → 22%PEOPLE ASSISTING THE HOMELESS INC: $10k → 22%CHILD HAVEN FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 22%MASADA HOUSE INC: $10k → 22%CHILDHAVEN FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 22%CHILDHAVEN FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 22%ECHO FOOD BANK: $10k → 22%CHILDHAVEN FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 22%ECHO FOOD BANK: $10k → 22%PEOPLE ASSISTING THE HOMELESS: $7k → 22%CHILDHAVEN FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 22%PEOPLE ASSISTING THE HOMELESS INC: $5k → 22%MASADA HOUSE INC: $2k → 22%FOUR CORNERS FOUNDATION: $5k → 22%FOUR CORNERS FOUNDATION: $3k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
PA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
NM
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 11% of Thomas a and Mary E Dugan Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 68% of the giving stays in NM; read by stated purpose it is 61% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Thomas a and Mary E Dugan Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.7% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.8M · 36 repeat orgs$253k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

36 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
21

Total granted

$1.8M
$138k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
0%

Still filing today

78%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $115k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    Tibbetts All Ability Park Foundation Inc
    4× · 2021–2025 · $520k · revenue +45% · 54% of their budget
  • DE
    Durango Early Learning Center Inc
    5× · 2021–2025 · $102k · revenue +26%
  • SJ
    SAN JUAN COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2020–2025 · $87k · revenue +79%

Funded once

  • TF
    THE FORT LEWIS COLLEGE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $26k · revenue +193%
  • SM
    SAINT MARGARET'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • DO
    DEPARTMENT OF NEW MEXICO VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE US AUXILIAR
    one grant, 2023 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Foundation of Southern New Mexico

The Community Foundation of Southern New Mexico serves as a community resource, connects donors to needs, and supports charitable organizations in their work.

Philanthropy
2
New Mexico Childrens Foundation

Grants and expenses for programs serving the physical, mental, educational and social needs of children and their families.

Human Services
3
El Pueblo Health Services Inc

Primary Rural Health Care

—
4
Santa Fe Community Foundation

The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…

Philanthropy
5
New Mexico Kids Matter Inc

New mexico kids matter inc., serves as a court appointed special advocate to advocate for the best interest of abused, neglected and high-risk children.

Crime & Legal
6
First Choice Community Healthcare Inc

To improve the health, life skills, and well-being of all members of the communities we serve by providing primary medical, dental, and behavioral health care, including health education, to the residents of bernalillo, valencia, and santa…

Health
7
Womens Resource Center in Durango

Womens Resource Center (WRC) in Durango connects women and girls to the resources and programming that will help them reach their full potential in all states of their life.

—
8
Children's Cancer Fund of New Mexico

The children's cancer fund of new mexico exists to help persons from new mexico who have been diagnosed with and treated for childhood cancer (at a new mexico pediatric oncology facility) and their families cope with the day-to-day…

—
9
Santa Fe Recovery Center Inc

Santa fe recovery center works with individuals to sustain lasting recovery from substance use disorders and related behavioral health disorders by providing culturally proficient, evidence-based treatment and education in partnership with…

Health
10
Pueblo Rape Crisis Services Inc

Juniper SoCO provides comprehensive healing resources to survivors of sexual assault / intimate partner violence, equipping the community to prevent future sexual violence, & fostering an organizational culture that prioritizes wellness…

Health
11
Pueblo Rescue Mission

Because of our love for God, we extend his mercy as we strive to empower and improve the lives of unsheltered adults in Pueblo, CO, through provisions of food, shelter and navigational support services.

—
12
Tu Casa Incorporated

To support healthy violence-free lives and relationships for all children and adults in the San Luis Valley by providing crisis intervention services advocacy and counseling for victims and survivors of domestic and sexual violence.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Las Cruces Inc and the most unlike its peers is True-Liif C & M Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyIndependent K-12 SchoolsCommunity Arts CentersPolicy Research and AdvocacyCommunity FoundationsCommunity College Foundatio…Community FoundationsHealth Access Advocacy and …Pregnancy Support ServicesYouth Sports ProgramsEquine Therapy ProgramsFood Banks and PantriesCancer Support ServicesAnimal Rescue and ShelterFaith-Based Social ServicesOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Domestic Violence Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 20. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%11%<5yr12%9%5–10yr19%23%10–20yr17%26%20–35yr16%26%35–55yr18%6%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%5%<5yr12%32%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr17%18%20–35yr16%27%35–55yr18%3%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 11% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/53
the rest of the field
12%
1,110/9,587

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
44/45
Grantees still filing
26/45
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Tibbetts All Ability Park Foundation Inc — $520,000 · Youth DevelopmentTibbetts All Ability Park Fou…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LA PLATA COUNTY INC — $20,000 · Youth Development+1 more — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentDurango Early Learning Center Inc — $102,000 · OtherDurango Early Learning Center IncSAN JUAN MEDICAL FOUNDATION INC — $68,500 · OtherSAN JUAN MEDICAL FOUNDATION INCDURANGO CAFE AU PLAY — $55,000 · OtherDURANGO CAFE AU PLAYUNDERGROUND BOOKS LITERARY ARTS FOUNDATION — $50,000 · OtherUNDERGROUND BOOKS LITERARY ARTS F…MANNA - THE DURANGO SOUP KITCHEN — $30,000 · OtherST MARGARET'S EPISOCPAL CHURCH — $30,000 · OtherBENEVOLENT PATRIOTIC ORDER OF DOES DROVE #91 — $30,000 · OtherSAINT MARGARET'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $25,000 · OtherADVOT — $59,000 · OtherADVOTSAN JUAN UNITED WAY — $30,000 · OtherREGIONAL ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION — $21,000 · Other+19 more — $109,300 · Other+19 moreECONOMIC COUNCIL HELPING OTHERS INC — $82,000 · Human ServicesECONOMIC COUNC…PEOPLE ASSISTING THE HOMELESS INC — $69,500 · Human ServicesPEOPLE ASSISTI…CHILDHAVEN FOUNDATION INC — $45,000 · Human ServicesCHILDHAVEN FOU…OPEN HANDS UNITED CHRISTIAN MINISTRYINC — $34,000 · Human ServicesOPEN HANDS UNI…MASADA HOUSE INC — $11,500 · Human ServicesPartnership With Native Americans — $10,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF LAS CRUCES INC — $10,000 · Human Services+2 more — $12,500 · Human ServicesFARMINGTON MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 · Arts & CultureFARMINGTON …ANGEL CITY CHORALE — $45,000 · Arts & CultureANGEL CITY …INSPIRE HEART INC — $40,000 · Arts & CultureINSPIRE HEA…Theater Ensemble Arts Inc — $10,000 · Arts & CultureTHE POWERHOUSE — $10,000 · Arts & CultureSAN JUAN COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $87,000 · EducationSAN JUAN CO…DONORSCHOOSEORG — $85,827 · EducationDONORSCHOOS…THE FORT LEWIS COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $26,000 · EducationTHE FORT LE…+1 more — $6,000 · EducationIGW CHILDRENS HOPE FOUNDATION INC — $61,000 · HealthSEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES OF NWNM — $32,500 · HealthPRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL SERVICES — $25,000 · HealthNAVAJO UNITED METHODIST CENTER — $23,000 · HealthROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC — $10,000 · Health+2 more — $10,000 · HealthEQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE INC — $50,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF W GEORGIA — $25,000 · PhilanthropyMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $5,000 · PhilanthropyGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Philanthropy
Youth Development$550,000Other$609,800Human Services$274,500Arts & Culture$205,000Education$204,827Health$161,500Philanthropy$85,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTibbetts All Ability Park Foundation Inc — $520,000 over 4y, 54% of budgetDurango Early Learning Center Inc — $102,000 over 5y, 6.9% of budgetFARMINGTON MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 1y, 41% of budgetSAN JUAN COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $87,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG — $85,827 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetECONOMIC COUNCIL HELPING OTHERS INC — $82,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetPEOPLE ASSISTING THE HOMELESS INC — $69,500 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetSAN JUAN MEDICAL FOUNDATION INC — $68,500 over 5y, 7.5% of budgetIGW CHILDRENS HOPE FOUNDATION INC — $61,000 over 6y, 4.6% of budgetADVOT — $59,000 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetEQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE INC — $50,000 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetCHILDHAVEN FOUNDATION INC — $45,000 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetANGEL CITY CHORALE — $45,000 over 7y, 3.5% of budgetINSPIRE HEART INC — $40,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetOPEN HANDS UNITED CHRISTIAN MINISTRYINC — $34,000 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetSEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES OF NWNM — $32,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetMANNA - THE DURANGO SOUP KITCHEN — $30,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSAN JUAN UNITED WAY — $30,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetTHE FORT LEWIS COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $26,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF W GEORGIA — $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL SERVICES — $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNAVAJO UNITED METHODIST CENTER — $23,000 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetREGIONAL ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION — $21,000 over 6y, 6.1% of budgetMeals on Wheels New Mexico — $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LA PLATA COUNTY INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetFOUR WINDS RECOVERY CENTER INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMASADA HOUSE INC — $11,500 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetTheater Ensemble Arts Inc — $10,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPartnership With Native Americans — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF LAS CRUCES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE POWERHOUSE — $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetFOUR CORNERS FOUNDATION INC — $7,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetSAN JUAN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE FOUNDATION — $6,000 over 2y, 9.2% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDSPEACE NATIONAL CENTERS FOR KIDS IN CRISIS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDSPEACE NATIONAL CENTERS OF GEORGIA — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGrief Center of Southwest Colorado — $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW MEXICO INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUS Wild Horse & Burro Association — $1,200 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetFour Corners Fastpitch Association — $600 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRIVER REACH FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 2.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Merrion Family Founda…Westmeath FoundationGreater Houston Commu…Connie Gotsch Arts Fo…San Juan United WayBallantine Family FundNew Mexico Community …Pnm Tnmp FoundationCarl C Anderson Sr an…Santa Fe Community Fo…Pierce Family Foundat…The Denver Foundation
Merrion Family FoundationDE55.2× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Merrion Family Foundation · Westmeath Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Connie Gotsch Arts Foundation · San Juan United Way · Ballantine Family Fund · New Mexico Community Foundation · Pnm Tnmp Foundation · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · Santa Fe Community Foundation · Pierce Family Foundation · The Denver Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Thomas a and Mary E Dugan Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines