Loading…
· Public charity
SAN JUAN UNITED WAY
To improve living conditions for the people in san juan county by developing fundraising activities that will best impact the community needs by providing funding for their activities.
$793k
Granted FY2024
10
Grants
1
Communities
$709k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 78% of SAN JUAN UNITED WAY’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02FY2024 · 10 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k8 grants · $59k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
- $250k+1 grant · $709k
$8,566
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
- MISCELLANEOUS ALLOCATIONS$708,704
- ECHO-FOODBANK$11,452
- KIRTLAND YOUTH AFTER SCHOOL$9,080
- PATH-DAILY BREAD$8,805
- CHILDHAVEN-PARENT SUPPORT$8,566
- SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICE$6,693
- NWNM SAS-SANE$6,693
- FARMINGTON BOYSGIRLS-SUMMER$6,319
- PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL SERVICE$6,186
- PMS-TOTAL BEHAVIORAL HEALTH$6,186
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $267k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22% — the area typically sits at 16%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
21%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$414k · 7 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else
7 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
7
37
Total granted
$414k
$837k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+22%
+29%
Still filing today
86%
19%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 7% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $722k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthCommunity ImprovementOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCHILDHAVEN-SAFEHOUSE2× · 2018–2024 · $89k · revenue +8%
- PSPATH-EMERGENCY SHELTER2× · 2018–2024 · $84k · revenue +22%
- EEHCO-PRESCHOOL2× · 2018–2024 · $69k · revenue +67%
Funded once
- FCFAMILY CRISIS CENTER-NON RESIDENTIAgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $54k · revenue +64%
- ABAZTEC BOYSGIRLS-SUMMERone grant, 2018 · $53k · revenue -83%
- ABAZTEC BOYSGIRLS-YOUTH PROGRAMSone grant, 2019 · $47k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Albuquerque Christian Children's Home Inc
The home provides care for children and wards of the court placed for foster home purposes.
Human Services
2
Arizona Baptist Children's Services
Serving families in their most pressing needs
Human Services
3
Tu Casa Incorporated
To support healthy violence-free lives and relationships for all childrenand adults in the San Luis Valley by providing crisis intervention shelterservices advocacy and counseling for victims and survivors of domesticand sexual violence.
—
4
Boys and Girls Club of Gallup
Promote healthy development alternatives for community youth.
Youth Development
5
Sexual Assault Services of Nwnm
Sas works in northwest new mexico and the surrounding four corners area to empower victims, provide crisis services and create a community focused on prevention.
Health
6
Pb&J Family Services Inc
To help at risk children to grow and develop to their full potential in nurturing families within a supportive community.
Education
7
New Mexico Christian Childrens Home
To be people who love god and love our neighbors, working in partnership with family, church and community to improve the lives of disadvantaged individuals, following the biblical call of jesus to "go and do likewise" while inspiring…
Human Services
8
Utah Valley Family Support Center Inc
Provide Services to Victims and Potential Victims of Child Abuse and Neglect
—
9
Prevent Child Abuse Utah
Prevention of child abuse
—
10
Youth Services for Choctaw Pushmataha and Mccurtain Counties Inc
To provide counseling services for youth and parents
Human Services
11
Boys and Girls Club of Sierra Vista Inc
To enable all young people to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens. to serve youth in sierra vista by providing them a safe, friendly, healthy and structured environment where they can have fun, learn and…
Youth Development
12
Pueblo Rape Crisis Services Inc
Providing healing resources to survivors of sexual violence & preventing future violence.
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girl Scouts of New Mexico Trails Inc and the most unlike its peers is Presbyterian Medical Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network
14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$1,533,915Human Services$266,938Youth Development$88,259Health$66,823Community Improvement$16,594
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHILDHAVEN-SAFEHOUSE ↗
- Who funds PATH-EMERGENCY SHELTER ↗
- Who funds EHCO-PRESCHOOL ↗
- Who funds FARMINGTON BOYSGIRLS-SUMMER ↗
- Who funds PMS-TOTAL BEHAVIORAL HEALTH ↗
- Who funds FAMILY CRISIS CENTER-NON RESIDENTIA ↗
- Who funds AZTEC BOYSGIRLS-SUMMER ↗
- Who funds BLOOMFIELD BOYSGIRLS-AFTER SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds KIRTLAND YOUTH AFTER SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds DESERT VIEW-YOP ↗
- Who funds HELPLINE ↗
- Who funds NEW BEGINNINGS-TRANSITIONAL ↗
- Who funds BOY SCOUTS-COMP YOUTH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Merrion Family FoundationDE33.3× affinity13 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Merrion Family Foundation · Westmeath Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Thomas a and Mary E Dugan Foundation · Pnm Resources Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation SAN JUAN UNITED WAY funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: BLOOMFIELD BOYSGIRLS-AFTER SCHOOL.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~8 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 3 filed years.
Track record & reputation
high risk
3 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing.
Legal standing
medium risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 850413779 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on BLOOMFIELD BOYSGIRLS-AFTER SCHOOL, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 8 months of cash on hand.
- FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 32% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to San Juan United Way?
Find your warmest path to San Juan United Way through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines