· Public charity
Think 360 Arts for Learning
To engage coloradans of all ages in innovative arts education programming that inspires creativity, builds community, & advances equity.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| STILLWATER MUSIC | $25,000 |
| COLORADO CONSERVATORY FOR THE JAZZ | $25,000 |
| DOWNTOWN AURORA VISUAL ARTS | $20,000 |
| EDUCATION THROUGH MUSIC-COLORADO I | $20,000 |
| YOUTH EMPOWERMENT BROADCASTING ORGA | $20,000 |
| FLATLAND MAKERS GUILD- A DEVISION O | $20,000 |
| STEPPING STONES OF THE ROARING FORK | $20,000 |
| VOICES | $20,000 |
| RESILIENCE1220 INC | $20,000 |
| ACCESS GALLERY | $20,000 |
| CENTRAL CITY OPERA | $20,000 |
| NEW COTTAGE ARTS | $20,000 |
| FEEL THE BEAT | $20,000 |
| LATINO CULTURAL ARTS CENTER | $20,000 |
| EL SISTEMA COLORADO | $19,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $336k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCColorado Conservatory For the Jazz Arts2× · 2024–2025 · $47k · revenue +24%
- EIETM-COLORADO INC2× · 2024–2025 · $40k · revenue +26%
- AGACCESS GALLERY2× · 2024–2025 · $40k · revenue +3%
Funded once
- AGALL GRANTS WERE UNDER 5000one grant, 2017 · $35k
- NONOON ORGANIZATIONone grant, 2024 · $25k · 32% of their budget
- BGBoys & Girls Clubs of Pueblo Countyone grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The center for arts, a home for arts and culture, offers engaging opportunities and educational experiences to enrich and expand the life of our community.
To provide an inclusive youth instrumental music program that promotes youth development, fosters peer camaraderie, instills respect for culture, and develops a pursuit of excellence.
Enrich childrens lives thorugh free group music lessons and instruments while enhancing the diversity of music performances in our community through intimate concerts of classical, jazz, and world music.
Within a supportive school community, AAK offers a robust arts program that complements core academics, fosters critical thinking skills, and creates confident, creative individuals with the freedom to reach their full potential.
Artibus is dedicated to strengthening community through the experience of live performance. We are a hub in Denver for intimate, original performances that explore important social themes and for building community through shared space,…
To assist the community through development of residential and commercial incentives, public art, art events, art programs, philanthropy and community outreach solutions, which result in a thriving community with engagement and pride.
To engage coloradans of all ages in innovative arts education programming that inspires creativity, builds community, & advances equity.
Line 1 Young Voices of Colorado offers outstanding music education in vocal technique, music therory, sight reading, choral artistry, and performance style. United through the study and performance of great choral music, the children…
Since 1966, BCAA acts as a catalyst to incubate, stimulate and sustain a thriving arts community in Boulder County. BCAA commits to championing policies and practices of cultural equity that empower a just, inclusive and equitable Boulder…
Colorado Artists in Recovery utilizes recovery-oriented principles to provide a safe, encouraging, and inclusive environment for people affected by substance use and mental health. Through our workshops and events we nurture their creative…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Swallow Hill Music Association and the most unlike its peers is Dancing Spirit Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 13 years old; the field is 15. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 10% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Colorado Conservatory For the Jazz Arts ↗
- Who funds ETM-COLORADO INC ↗
- Who funds DOWNTOWN AURORA VISUAL ARTS ↗
- Who funds STEPPING STONES OF THE ROARING FORK VALLEY ↗
- Who funds NEW COTTAGE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds ACCESS GALLERY ↗
- Who funds COLORADO BLACK ARTS MOVEMENT ↗
- Who funds NOON ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of Pueblo County ↗
- Who funds STILLWATER MUSIC ↗
- Who funds Youth Empowerment Broadcasting Org ↗
- Who funds WEEHAWKEN CREATIVE ARTS ↗
- Who funds FEEL THE BEAT CORP ↗
- Who funds Voices ↗
- Who funds MIRROR IMAGE ↗
- Who funds RESILIENCE 1220 INC ↗
- Who funds COLORADO MUSIC BRIDGE ↗
- Who funds THE MATTHEWS HOUSE ↗
- Who funds LATINO CULTURAL ARTS CENTER ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL CITY OPERA HOUSE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds EL SISTEMA COLORADO ↗
- Who funds AH HAA SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds MUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN INC ↗
- Who funds SWALLOW HILL MUSIC ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds BRECKENRIDGE CREATIVE ARTS ↗
- Who funds Youth Documentary Academy ↗
- Who funds SPHERE ENSEMBLE LLC ↗
- Who funds ART STUDENTS LEAGUE OF DENVER ↗
- Who funds Fiesta Colorado ↗
- Who funds DANCING SPIRIT INC ↗
- Who funds Arvada Center for the Arts and Humanities ↗
- Who funds ACTORS COMPANY AND THEATER SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds PLATTEFORUM ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Bonfils-Stanton Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · Redline · Xcel Energy Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Gates Family Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Sheila Fortune Foundation Inc · Latino Community Foundation of Colorado Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Think 360 Arts for Learning funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Think 360 Arts for Learning?
Find your warmest path to Think 360 Arts for Learning through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.