Skip to content

· Private foundation

Therese Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$180k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

International$515kHuman Services$215kReligion$155kPhilanthropy$115kHealth$95kYouth Development$60kEmployment$15kEducation$2k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$20,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIVING GOODS$20,000
HELLEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL$20,000
AGAINST MALARIA FOUNDATION$20,000
NEW INCENTIVES$20,000
EDUCATE GIRLS$20,000
PARTNERS IN HEALTH$20,000
THE NIGHT MINISTRY CHICAGO$20,000
JEREMIAH PROGRAM$10,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA$10,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$10,000
GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 65% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PARTNERS IN HEALTH: $20k → 16%GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY: $15k → 11%JEREMIAH PROGRAM: $15k → 14%LIVING GOODS: $20k → 10%NEW INCENTIVES: $20k → 14%EDUCATE GIRLS: $20k → 13%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA: $15k → 17%THE NIGHT MINISTRY CHICAGO: $20k → 14%PARTNERS IN HEALTH: $15k → 16%GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY: $15k → 11%JEREMIAH PROGRAM: $15k → 14%LIVING GOODS: $15k → 10%NEW INCENTIVES: $15k → 14%EDUCATE GIRLS: $15k → 13%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA: $15k → 17%THE NIGHT MINISTRY CHICAGO: $20k → 14%PARTNERS IN HEALTH: $15k → 16%GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY: $15k → 11%JEREMIAH PROGRAM: $15k → 14%LIVING GOODS: $10k → 10%NEW INCENTIVES: $10k → 14%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA: $15k → 17%THE NIGHT MINISTRY CHICAGO: $20k → 14%PARTNERS IN HEALTH: $15k → 16%GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY: $10k → 11%JEREMIAH PROGRAM: $15k → 14%LIVING GOODS: $10k → 10%NEW INCENTIVES: $10k → 14%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA: $15k → 17%THE NIGHT MINISTRY CHICAGO: $20k → 14%PARTNERS IN HEALTH: $10k → 16%JEREMIAH PROGRAM: $15k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY CHICAGO: $20k → 14%JEREMIAH PROGRAM: $15k → 14%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $15k → 17%THE NIGHT MINISTRY CHICAGO: $20k → 14%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $15k → 17%THE NIGHT MINISTRY CHICAGO: $20k → 14%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $15k → 17%THE NIGHT MINISTRY CHICAGO: $15k → 14%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $15k → 17%HELLEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL: $20k → 17%HELLEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL: $15k → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES ST PAULMPLS: $25k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES ST PAULMPLS: $25k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES ST PAULMPLS: $25k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES DOROTHY DAY CENT: $20k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES ST PAULMPLS: $15k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 14 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against -95% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
2

Total granted

$1.1M
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
-95%

Still filing today

86%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JP
    JEREMIAH PROGRAM
    8× · 2018–2025 · $110k · revenue +182%
  • TA
    The Against Malaria Foundation
    7× · 2019–2025 · $105k · revenue +29%
  • HK
    HELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL
    8× · 2018–2025 · $95k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES DOROTHY DAY CENT
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • WA
    WE ALL CODE
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue -95%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
2
Health Poverty Action Usa

Health Poverty Action USA acts in solidarity with health workers, activists & communities worldwide to improve health & challenge the causes of poverty. We do this in 3 distinct ways: 1. We approach health as an issue of social justice. We…

International
3
Global Strategies

Global Strategies empowers communities in the most neglected areas of the world to improve the lives of women and children through healthcare.

Health
4
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
5
Mary's Meals Usa Inc

To raise donations to (i) provide a daily meal in a place of education for children in the world's poorest communities; (ii) occasionally provide relief for those suffering, in any part of the world, as a result of humanitarian crises…

International
6
Intelehealth Inc

Intelehealth leverages open-source technology for Governments, NGOs and Hospitals to seamlessly connect 'hard to reach' populations with high quality primary healthcare. Health organizations all over the world have used our technology to…

International
7
Charity Global Inc

Charity: water is a non-profit organization bringing clean and safe water to people around the world. continued on schedule o.

Human Services
8
Zoe Empowers

Zoe Empowers is a global network of local organizations throughout Africa and India providing a replicable and scalable framework whereby youth led or resourced families are provided the training, resources, and community support to become…

International
9
International Youth Foundation

Iyf is a global ngo that prepares young people to be healthy, productive and engaged citizens.

International
10
Women in Global Health Inc

Women in global health (wgh) is a global movement and organization that brings together all genders and backgrounds to achieve gender equality in global health leadership.

Public Benefit
11
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
12
Direct Action for Women Now World-Wide Inc Formerly Indias Daughters Inc
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Twin Cities United Way; the most unlike its peers is The Cookie Cart. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
6/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL: $95,000 · InternationalHELEN KELLER INTERNATIONALLIVING GOODS: $95,000 · InternationalLIVING GOODSInternational Rescue Committee INC: $70,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INCMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $70,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCNEW INCENTIVES: $65,000 · InternationalNEW INCENTIVESEDUCATE GIRLS: $35,000 · InternationalEDUCATE GIRLSTHE NIGHT MINISTRY CHICAGO: $155,000 · OtherTHE NIGHT MINISTRY CHICAGOCATHOLIC CHARITIES ST PAULMPLS: $105,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES ST PAULM…CATHOLIC CHARITIES DOROTHY DAY CENT: $20,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES DOROTHY …The Against Malaria Foundation: $105,000 · HealthThe Against Malar…PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $75,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALT…JEREMIAH PROGRAM: $110,000 · Housing & ShelterJEREMIAH P…GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY: $95,000 · PhilanthropyGREATER T…The Cookie Cart: $60,000 · Youth DevelopmentAT HOME GROUP: $15,000 · EmploymentWE ALL CODE: $2,000 · Education
International$430,000Other$280,000Health$180,000Housing & Shelter$110,000Philanthropy$95,000Youth Development$60,000Employment$15,000Education$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEREMIAH PROGRAM: $110,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetThe Against Malaria Foundation: $105,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY: $95,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL: $95,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLIVING GOODS: $95,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $75,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $70,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $70,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNEW INCENTIVES: $65,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetThe Cookie Cart: $60,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetEDUCATE GIRLS: $35,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAT HOME GROUP: $15,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEREMIAH PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds The Against Malaria Foundation ↗
  • Who funds GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds HELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds LIVING GOODS ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW INCENTIVES ↗
  • Who funds The Cookie Cart ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATE GIRLS ↗
  • Who funds AT HOME GROUP ↗
  • Who funds WE ALL CODE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE9.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Therese Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Therese Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Therese’s filings →

More from the funding graph