Skip to content

· Private foundation

Therese and Tim Fitzgibbons

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$94k
Granted FY2025still arriving
34
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$193kReligion$142kRecreation & Sports$85kHealth$30kHuman Services$24kHousing & Shelter$18kCrime & Legal$18kPhilanthropy$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k31 grants · $58k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $36k
$2,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$749k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME$13,000
Individual grant recipient$12,000
CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY$10,700
MAYO CLINIC$7,000
MADONNA ABILITY ALLIANCE$5,500
SHELTERING TREE$5,000
CHI FOUNDATION$5,000
ST MARGARET MARY PARISH$4,400
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$3,000
OLD ST MARYS CATHOLIC SCHOOL$3,000
DUNDEE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$2,500
PROJECT HARMONY$2,500
ARCHDIOCESE OF OMAHA$2,500
ROOT BIBLE$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $700) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PGA REACH NEBRASKA: $200 → 13%ESSENTIAL PREGNANCY SERVICES: $100 → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $200 → 12%WOMENS CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $200 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
IA
IN
OH
NJ
NE
MO
VA
MD
AZ
KS
NC
DC
OK
LA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$448k · 35 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +112% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

35 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
28

Total granted

$448k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+112%
+11%

Still filing today

34%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CU
    Creighton University
    9× · 2017–2025 · $96k · revenue +48%
  • PH
    PROJECT HARMONY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $17k · revenue +117%
  • ST
    SHELTERING TREE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $14k · revenue +132%

Funded once

  • SA
    ST AUGUSTINE PARISH
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • MH
    MERCY HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • WF
    WESTSIDE FOUNDATIONS
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

—
2
Nebraska Methodist Hospital

Nebraska methodist hospital (commonly know as "methodist hospital") is an acute care facility dedicated to bringing high quality care for the mind, body and spirit of every person. we provide community-based health care, health education…

Health
3
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
4
The Foundation for Health Care Continuums

The mission of the foundation for health care continuums is to strengthen each community we serve by providing a wide spectrum of housing and health care services that honor the evolving, aging population.

Health
5
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
6
Methodist Fremont Health

The mission of methodist fremont health is to improve the quality of life by caring for the body and mind. methodist fremont health supports its mission of caring for people through the provision of inpatient and outpatient hospital…

Health
7
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
8
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
9
The Foundation of Firsthealth Inc

Provide philanthropic support to firsthealth of the carolinas, inc., a healthcare system exempt from income tax under irs section 501c(3) and 170(b)(1)(a)(iii).

—
10
Unmc Physicians

Our mission is to lead the world in transforming lives to create a healthy future for all individuals and communities through premier educational programs, innovative research and extraordinary patient care.

Health
11
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
12
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Deborah Hospital Foundation; the most unlike its peers is University of Notre Dame du Lac. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
18/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST MARGARET MARY: $106,450 · OtherST MARGARET MARYMADONNA SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY BASED SERVICES: $43,600 · OtherMADONNA SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY BASED SERVICESOLD ST MARYS CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $23,000 · OtherOLD ST MARYS CATHOLIC SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $20,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $15,500 · Other+46 more: $112,300 · Other+46 moreCreighton University: $95,950 · EducationCreighton UniversityUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $85,000 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du LacFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $6,750 · Education+2 more: $5,250 · EducationSHELTERING TREE INC: $14,250 · Housing & ShelterSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE: $3,950 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $100 · Housing & ShelterPROJECT HARMONY: $17,250 · Crime & Legal+1 more: $250 · Crime & LegalMAYO CLINIC: $9,000 · HealthALS IN THE HEARTLAND INC: $2,000 · HealthALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC: $500 · HealthDEBORAH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $500 · Health+3 more: $750 · HealthWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesNEBRASKA PGA FOUNDATION: $200 · Human ServicesOPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE: $200 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $200 · Human Services+1 more: $100 · Human ServicesHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC: $3,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$320,950Education$192,950Housing & Shelter$18,300Crime & Legal$17,500Health$12,750Human Services$5,700Food & Nutrition$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCreighton University: $95,950 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $85,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HARMONY: $17,250 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSHELTERING TREE INC: $14,250 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $6,750 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND: $4,100 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE: $3,950 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetALS IN THE HEARTLAND INC: $2,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS: $750 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDEBORAH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEBRASKA METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEAD FOR THE CURE FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASA FOR DOUGLAS COUNTY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKICKS FOR A CURE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEBRASKA PGA FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEPS ESSENTIAL PREGNANCY SERVICES INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOSAIC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL D-DAY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Creighton University ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HARMONY ↗
  • Who funds SHELTERING TREE INC ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds SIENA FRANCIS HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds ALS IN THE HEARTLAND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Charles and Mary Heider Family FoundationNE24.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · The Lozier Foundation · Seline Family Foundation · Mammel Family Foundation · Immanuel Community Vision Foundation · The Enrichment Foundation · The Dorothy B Davis Foundation · Moglia Family Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · The Tesi Foundation · Slezak Family Charitable Foundation · Stephen F Dwyer Memorial Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Therese and Tim Fitzgibbons funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Therese and Tim Fitzgibbons. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Als Therapy Development Foundation Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Therese and Tim Fitzgibbons?

Find your warmest path to Therese and Tim Fitzgibbons through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 74 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Therese and Tim Fitzgibbons’ filings →

More from the funding graph