Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Tesi Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$10k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$101kRecreation & Sports$30kEducation$25kHealth$10kHousing & Shelter$4kFood & Nutrition$2kHuman Services$1kYouth Development$750Other$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $325
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$275
Median grant
1
States reached
$172k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST WENCESLAUS CHURCH$10,000
ST ROBERT BELLARMINE CHURCH$275
SHELBY LIBRARY FOUNDATION$50
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%LOVE MOVES US: $290 → 7%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $400 → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $250 → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $250 → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $250 → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $250 → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $100 → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICES: $250 → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICES: $200 → 12%HEARTLAND HOPE MISSION: $500 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$132k · 17 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
13

Total granted

$132k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+29%

Still filing today

35%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $275 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterEducationReligionFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SL
    ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2019–2023 · $3k · revenue +9%
  • ST
    SHELTERING TREE INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $350 · revenue +512%
  • SM
    ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE
    2× · 2022–2024 · $100 · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • NM
    NEBRASKA MEDICAL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +169%
  • HH
    HEARTLAND HOPE MISSIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $500 · revenue +365%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES
    one grant, 2019 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
2
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
3
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
4
Nourishing Hope

Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.

5
Heart Ministry Center

Heart ministry center's mission is to provide food, healthcare, and a way forward to people severely affected by poverty in the omaha area. heart ministry center's core programs include a choice food distribution program, monen healthcare…

Food & Nutrition
6
Heartland Community Health Network Inc

Heartland community health network exists to support and strengthen its federally qualified health center members through collaboration, information-sharing and integration of administrative, fiscal and clinical operations.

Health
7
Siouxland Community Health Center

Inspiring and empowering our community through health equity for all.

Health
8
Lutheran Family Services of Ne Inc

Lutheran family services of nebraska, inc.'s (lfs) mission is to express god's love for all people by providing quality human care services that build and strengthen individual, family and community life. our vision is saftey, hope and…

Human Services
9
The Foundation for Health Care Continuums

The mission of the foundation for health care continuums is to strengthen each community we serve by providing a wide spectrum of housing and health care services that honor the evolving, aging population.

Health
10
Heartland Community Health Clinic D/B/a Heartland Health Services

Provide affordable, high-quality health services and remove inequities to improve the lives of all.

Health
11
Miracle Hill Ministries Inc

Miracle hill ministries is committed to life transformation for children and adults experiencing homelessness. more information and program outcomes may be found at www.miraclehill.org.

Human Services
12
Lifeworks Services Inc

Lifeworks' mission is to partner with people with disabilities to drive change by increasing opportunity and access in the community.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Heartland Family Service and the most unlike its peers is University of Notre Dame du Lac. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST WENCESLAUS CHURCH — $100,000 · OtherST WENCESLAUS CHURCHMARIAN HIGH SCHOOL — $20,400 · OtherMARIAN HIGH SCHOOL+17 more — $7,545 · Other+17 moreUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $30,000 · EducationUniversity of Notre D…ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY — $3,000 · EducationST LOUIS UNIVERSITYNEBRASKA MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Health+2 more — $350 · HealthOPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE — $1,500 · Human ServicesHEARTLAND HOPE MISSION — $500 · Human ServicesHEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE — $450 · Human ServicesLOVE MOVES US INC — $290 · Human ServicesSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE — $800 · Housing & ShelterSHELTERING TREE INC — $350 · Housing & ShelterOasis Counseling International — $250 · ReligionST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE — $100 · Food & Nutrition
Other$127,945Education$33,000Health$10,350Human Services$2,740Housing & Shelter$1,150Religion$250Food & Nutrition$100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNEBRASKA MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY — $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE — $1,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE — $800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTLAND HOPE MISSION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE — $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHELTERING TREE INC — $350 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLOVE MOVES US INC — $290 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOasis Counseling International — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE — $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac
  • Who funds NEBRASKA MEDICAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds OPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE
  • Who funds SIENA FRANCIS HOUSE
  • Who funds HEARTLAND HOPE MISSION
  • Who funds HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE
  • Who funds SHELTERING TREE INC
  • Who funds LOVE MOVES US INC
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Oasis Counseling International
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND
  • Who funds ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Therese and Tim FitzgibbonsNE13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Therese and Tim Fitzgibbons · Midlands Community Foundation · The Lozier Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Tesi Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph