· Public charity
The Enrichment Foundation
To help support the Omaha Community Foundation's mission by helping to enrich the physical, emotional, and mental needs of individuals who are physically unable to care for themselves in and around the Omaha metropolitan area.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $10k
- $10k–50k26 grants · $654k
- $50k–250k13 grants · $1.3M
- $250k+1 grant · $250k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Visiting Nurse Health Service | $250,000 |
| Nebraska Assistive Technology | $200,000 |
| Childrens Respite Care Ctr | $200,000 |
| Munroe Meyer Institute | $150,000 |
| Easter Seals Society of Neb | $100,000 |
| Quality Living Inc | $100,000 |
| Ollie Webb Center Inc | $90,000 |
| Project Houseworks | $80,000 |
| United Cerebral Palsy of Neb | $75,000 |
| Alzheimers Association Neb | $75,000 |
| Gotta Be Me Inc | $75,000 |
| Executive Services Corp of NE | $65,000 |
| HELP Adult Services | $65,000 |
| Paralyzed Veterans of America | $50,000 |
| WHY ARTS Inc | $40,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $2.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
42 repeat relationships — 39 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CRCONNECTED ROOTS CARE CENTER5× · 2020–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +130%
- ESEASTER SEALS NEBRASKA5× · 2020–2024 · $470k · revenue +58%
- QLQUALITY LIVING INC5× · 2020–2024 · $435k · revenue +42%
Funded once
MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INCone grant, 2020 · $95k · revenue +1%- LOLEAGUE OF HUMAN DIGNITY INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $60k · revenue +92%
- CDCHARLES DREW HEALTH CENTER INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +31%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.
To accelerate scientific discoveries that will lead to breakthrough diagnostics, therapeutics and cures for people living with neuroimmune axis disorders.
Together, we create a warm and welcoming community enriching the lives of those we support.
The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.
Connectability of mn, inc. works to advance the independence, productivity, and full citizenship of people experiencing physical or invisible barriers.
To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.
Innovative services, inc. (isi) cares for those with disabilities, helping them lead fulfilling lives with maximum independence. innovative's vision is to be the most trusted care provider for people with disabilities in wisconsin.
A b l e , inc (a brighter living experience, inc) is organized to provide residential care for developmentally disabled minnesota residents at its residential and intermediate care facilities located in houston county, minnesota. the…
To serve all north carolinians with significant disabilities by ensuring they can live independently in a barrier-free community of their choice through consumer-controlled, self-directed services.
The organization is a partnership of world leaders in als research and care focused on expediting breakthrough treatments and ultimately a cure for als while providing resources and equipment to those living with the disease now. the team…
To provide a reasonable volume of developmentally disabled services to residents of the surrounding region who are or shall be diagnosed or thought to be developmentally disabled.
Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Easter Seals Nebraska and the most unlike its peers is Whyarts Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE VISITING NURSE HEALTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds CONNECTED ROOTS CARE CENTER ↗
- Who funds EASTER SEALS NEBRASKA ↗
- Who funds QUALITY LIVING INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HOUSEWORKS ↗
- Who funds OLLIE WEBB CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF NE INC ↗
- Who funds EXECUTIVE SERVICES CORPS-NEBR INC ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds HELP ADULT SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Gotta Be Me Inc ↗
- Who funds ONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA GREAT PLAINS CHAPTER ↗
- Who funds OUTLOOK ENRICHMENT ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT ↗
- Who funds AUTISM CENTER OF NEBRASKA INC ↗
- Who funds ALS IN THE HEARTLAND INC ↗
- Who funds WHYARTS INC ↗
- Who funds ALLPLAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HARMONY ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIORS FAMILY SUPPORT INC ↗
- Who funds AT EASE USA ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ALLIANCE REHABILITATION SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Youth Care Inc ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKA ADAPTIVE SPORTS ↗
- Who funds MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds AUTISM ACTION PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds DOWN SYNDROME ALLIANCE OF THE MIDLANDS ↗
- Who funds LEAGUE OF HUMAN DIGNITY INC ↗
- Who funds HEARTLAND EQUINE THERAPEUTIC RIDING ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds NAMI NEBRASKA ↗
- Who funds CHARLES DREW HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BOULDER CREST FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds SHELTERING TREE INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds DUET FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Sherwood Foundation · The Lozier Foundation · Immanuel Community Vision Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · Weitz Family Foundation · Mutual of Omaha Foundation · United Way of the Midlands · The Hawks Foundation · The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · Nebraska Community Foundation · The Dorothy B Davis Foundation · Leland J & Dorothy H Olson Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Enrichment Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Enrichment Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Enrichment Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.