Skip to content

· Private foundation

Theodore A Von Der Ahe Jr Trust

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$326k
Granted FY2026still arriving
37
Grants FY2026still arriving
12
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2026.

International$1.0MCivil Rights$383kReligion$299kHuman Services$159kEnvironment$139kPublic Safety & Disaster$100kHousing & Shelter$80kArts & Culture$50kOther$0
02FY2026 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k21 grants · $101k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $225k
$5,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Catholic Relief Services$20,000
Amnesty International$20,000
Human Rights Watch$20,000
Partners In Health$20,000
USA for UNHCR$20,000
Truthout$20,000
Southern Poverty Law Center$15,000
Young Center for Immigrant Children$10,000
RAICES$10,000
Haiti Nursing Foundation$10,000
Al Otro Lado$10,000
350Org$10,000
Doctors Without Borders$10,000
Refugee Council USA$10,000
UNRWA USA National Committee$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–26, $190k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Refugee Council USA: $10k → 14%Christian Appalachian Project Inc: $5k → 26%Christian Appalachian Project Inc: $5k → 26%Christian Appalachian Project Inc: $4k → 26%Refugee Council USA: $4k → 14%Christian Appalachian Project Inc: $4k → 26%Refugee Council USA: $4k → 14%Christian Appalachian Project Inc: $3k → 26%Alexandria House: $5k → 14%Refugee Council USA: $4k → 14%Christian Appalachian Project Inc: $3k → 26%Alexandria House: $4k → 14%Refugee Council USA: $4k → 14%Christian Appalachian Project Inc: $2k → 26%Alexandria House: $4k → 14%Christian Appalachian Project Inc: $2k → 26%Refugee Council USA: $4k → 14%Christian Appalachian Project Inc: $2k → 26%Alexandria House: $4k → 14%Christian Appalachian Project Inc: $2k → 26%Alexandria House: $3k → 14%Refugee Council USA: $4k → 14%North Valley Caring Services Inc: $5k → 14%Step Up on Second Inc: $4k → 14%North Valley Caring Services Inc: $5k → 14%Step Up on Second Inc: $4k → 14%North Valley Caring Services Inc: $5k → 14%Step Up on Second Inc: $4k → 14%North Valley Caring Services Inc: $5k → 14%Step Up on Second Inc: $4k → 14%North Valley Caring Services Inc: $3k → 14%Step Up on Second Inc: $2k → 14%Al Otro Lado: $10k → 14%Al Otro Lado: $5k → 14%House of Ruth: $5k → 14%Al Otro Lado: $5k → 14%Al Otro Lado: $5k → 14%Al Otro Lado: $5k → 14%North American Congress on Latin Am: $3k → 17%Al Otro Lado: $4k → 14%House of Ruth: $4k → 14%Al Otro Lado: $4k → 14%Episcopal Relief and Development: $3k → 17%Episcopal Relief and Development: $2k → 17%Episcopal Relief and Development: $2k → 17%House of Ruth: $2k → 14%House of Ruth: $2k → 14%House of Ruth: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
PA
CA
MO
KY
MD
AZ
DC
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 73 repeat orgs$76k to everyone else

73 repeat relationships: 34 still active in FY2026, 39 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

73
14

Total granted

$2.4M
$51k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+74%

Still filing today

63%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
InternationalHuman ServicesEnvironmentReligionPhilanthropyCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION
    10× · 2017–2026 · $150k · revenue +120%
  • AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC
    5× · 2022–2026 · $100k · revenue +1%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    9× · 2017–2026 · $80k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • FO
    Friends of Peace Jst in the Holy La
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • CE
    Catholic Education Foundation
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • GW
    GLOBAL WITNESS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $4k · revenue +92%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
2
International Crisis Group

Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…

International
3
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
4
Indigenous Peoples Rights Inc

To lead and coordinate the global initiative to address and prevent criminalization, violence, and impunity against indigenous peoples towards strengthening their collectives, solidarity, and actions.

Human Services
5
Guernica Centre for InternationalJustice

The Guernica Centre for International Justice represents the interests of victims in national and international legal proceedings, putting in place transnational accountability strategies that seek to maximize the protection of victims'…

International
6
The International Institute On Race Equality and Human Rights

The international institute on race, equality and human rights contributes to the promotion and defense of human rights, through training, technical assistance, advocacy, and strategic litigation conducted at the regional and international…

International
7
International Refugee Assistance Project Inc

Irap is a global legal aid and advocacy organization working to create a world where refugees and all people seeking safety are empowered to claim their right to freedom of movement and a path to lasting refuge. everyone should have a safe…

Human Services
8
Refugee Protection International Inc

Rpi's mission is to partner with local non-gov organizations and others to strengthen protection and self-reliance among refugees and internally displaced persons near conflict zones.

International
9
Washington Office On Latin America

To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.

International
10
The International Refugee Rights Initiative

To enhance the protection of rights of the displaced worldwide by the provision of advice and assistance on the application of international law, the conducting of research on the interpretation and application of international law and the…

—
11
Women's Refugee Commission Inc

To improve the lives and protect the rights of women, children and youth displaced by conflict and crisis. the women's refugee commission envisions a world in which refugees are safe, healthy and reliant and seeks to drive change in…

Human Services
12
Nuru International

Nuru is a global collective that enables inclusive and sustainable prosperity by identifying communities at the stability tipping point, strengthening rural livelihoods and market systems, and fostering stabilizing connections that repair…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Human Rights Watch Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Society for Biblical Studies Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

59 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 59 of the 92 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
18
Early backer (in before they grew)
56/59
Grantees still filing
46/59
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

United States Association for UNHCR: $105,000 · InternationalUnited States Association for UNHCRHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $100,000 · InternationalHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INCAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $100,000 · InternationalAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INCMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $80,340 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $80,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEFHAITI NURSING FOUNDATION INC: $72,340 · InternationalHAITI NURSING FOUNDATION INCAJ MUSTE FOUNDATION FOR PEACE AND JUSTICE INC: $52,000 · InternationalAJ MUSTE FOUNDATION FOR PEACE AND JUSTICE I…HAITI REHABILITATION FOUNDATION INC: $47,340 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC: $34,000 · InternationalMIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $34,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL LABOR RIGHTS FORUM: $34,000 · International+13 more: $193,340 · International+13 moreCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $100,000 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESSt Camillus Center: $66,000 · OtherSt Camillus CenterGREENPEACE INC: $59,000 · OtherGREENPEACE INC350Org: $58,000 · Other350OrgFriends of Sabeel North America: $49,000 · OtherCHRISTIAN PEACEMAKER TEAMS INC: $48,000 · OtherLas Familias Del Pueblo: $45,000 · OtherLos Angeles Community Action Networ: $40,000 · OtherMaryknoll Lay Missioners: $39,500 · OtherAmericans for Middle East Understanding Inc: $38,000 · OtherMARYKNOLL SISTERS OF ST DOMINIC INC: $32,000 · Other+40 more: $377,000 · Other+40 moreAL OTRO LADO: $38,000 · Human ServicesREFUGEE COUNCIL USA: $34,000 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $32,000 · Human ServicesNORTH VALLEY CARING SERVICES: $23,000 · Human ServicesALEXANDRIA HOUSE: $20,000 · Human ServicesSTEP UP ON SECOND STREET INC: $18,000 · Human ServicesHOUSE OF RUTH INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesEPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $7,000 · Human Services+1 more: $3,000 · Human ServicesPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $150,000 · HealthEarth Island Institute Inc: $40,340 · EnvironmentInternational Rivers Network: $34,000 · Environment+1 more: $2,000 · EnvironmentSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $76,000 · Crime & LegalTHE SOCIETY FOR BIBLICAL STUDIES INC: $30,000 · ReligionInterfaith Worker Justice: $29,000 · ReligionPROGRESSIVE CHRISTIANS UNITING: $14,000 · Religion
International$932,360Other$951,500Human Services$190,000Health$150,000Environment$76,340Crime & Legal$76,000Religion$73,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $150,000 over 10y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR: $105,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $100,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $100,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $80,340 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $80,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $76,000 over 10y, 0.0% of budgetHAITI NURSING FOUNDATION INC: $72,340 over 9y, 2.4% of budgetGREENPEACE INC: $59,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAJ MUSTE FOUNDATION FOR PEACE AND JUSTICE INC: $52,000 over 10y, 1.2% of budgetHAITI REHABILITATION FOUNDATION INC: $47,340 over 9y, 7.4% of budgetLas Familias Del Pueblo: $45,000 over 10y, 1.4% of budgetEarth Island Institute Inc: $40,340 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAmericans for Middle East Understanding Inc: $38,000 over 10y, 4.1% of budgetAL OTRO LADO: $38,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetREFUGEE COUNCIL USA: $34,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $34,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $34,000 over 10y, 0.1% of budgetInternational Rivers Network: $34,000 over 10y, 0.4% of budgetINTERNATIONAL LABOR RIGHTS FORUM: $34,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $32,000 over 10y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS INC: $31,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SOCIETY FOR BIBLICAL STUDIES INC: $30,000 over 10y, 3.7% of budgetTHOUSAND CURRENTS: $30,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetInterfaith Worker Justice: $29,000 over 7y, 8.2% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE: $27,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTRUTHOUT: $23,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNORTH VALLEY CARING SERVICES: $23,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetLAMP INC: $23,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES: $22,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetALEXANDRIA HOUSE: $20,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF RECONCILIATION INC: $20,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetRESIST INC: $20,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetSKID ROW HOUSING TRUST: $19,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSTEP UP ON SECOND STREET INC: $18,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMADRE INC: $18,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTEACHING FOR CHANGE: $17,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetACTION AFRICA INC: $17,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetUKRAINE HOUSE DC FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSE OF RUTH INC: $15,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHURCHES FOR MIDDLE EAST PEACE: $14,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetPROGRESSIVE CHRISTIANS UNITING: $14,000 over 5y, 19% of budgetFONKOZE USA INC: $12,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPASADENA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNISGUA: $9,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetCHILDREN'S MEDICAL MISSION OF HAITI: $8,340 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetEPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetASYLUM ACCESS: $4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds United States Association for UNHCR ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HAITI NURSING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENPEACE INC ↗
  • Who funds AJ MUSTE FOUNDATION FOR PEACE AND JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds HAITI REHABILITATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Las Familias Del Pueblo ↗
  • Who funds Earth Island Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds Americans for Middle East Understanding Inc ↗
  • Who funds AL OTRO LADO ↗
  • Who funds REFUGEE COUNCIL USA ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds International Rivers Network ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL LABOR RIGHTS FORUM ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SOCIETY FOR BIBLICAL STUDIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THOUSAND CURRENTS ↗
  • Who funds Interfaith Worker Justice ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE ↗
  • Who funds TRUTHOUT ↗
  • Who funds NORTH VALLEY CARING SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds LAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES ↗
  • Who funds ALEXANDRIA HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF RECONCILIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shelter Partnership IncCA17.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shelter Partnership Inc · Arc of Justice · The Winky Foundation Co Wilmington Trust Co · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Foundation to Promote Open Society · California Community Foundation · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · Tides Foundation · United Way Inc · Weingart Foundation · Open Society Institute

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Theodore A Von Der Ahe Jr Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Theodore A Von Der Ahe Jr Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Resist Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 92 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Theodore A Von Der Ahe Jr’s filings →

More from the funding graph