Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Yeargan Foundation Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$4.1MHealth$2.1MPublic Safety & Disaster$1.0MHuman Services$862kHousing & Shelter$126kInternational$100kCrime & Legal$50kEnvironment$28kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $18k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $433k
  • $250k+4 grants · $2.0M
$5,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$24M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WakeMed Foundation$1,000,000
Duke University$400,000
Transitions Life Care$325,000
Bastion Community of Resilence$300,000
Durham Nativity School$162,500
Community of Hope$120,000
Canines for Service Inc$50,000
Immigrant Defenders Law Center$50,000
50 Legs in 50 Days$50,000
Bristol Bay Heritage Land Trust$5,000
Covenant House$5,000
Brother Martin High School$5,000
Dream House Wellness Foundation$2,000
Church of the Savior$100
American Cancer Society$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $326k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 15% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Canines for Service Inc: $50k → 12%RALEIGH RESCUE MISSION: $500 → 8%YMCA OF THE TRIANGLE: $50k → 8%YMCA OF THE TRIANGLE: $50k → 8%YMCA OF THE TRIANGLE: $50k → 8%YMCA OF THE TRIANGLE: $50k → 8%YMCA OF THE TRIANGLE: $50k → 8%GARNER AREA MINISTRIES: $25k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
NY
IN
PA
CT
CA
KY
MD
KS
NC
LA
MS
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.9M · 13 repeat orgs$2.5M to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
19

Total granted

$5.9M
$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+65%

Still filing today

54%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $458k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthReligionEnvironmentPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +49%
  • DURHAM NATIVITY SCHOOL INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $548k · revenue +8%
  • TY
    The Young Men's Christian Association of the Triangle Area Inc (4598)
    5× · 2020–2024 · $250k · revenue +89%

Funded once

  • WC
    WAKE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2021 · $1.9M
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue 0%
  • GA
    GARNER AREA MINISTRIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +65%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hospice of Gaston County Inc

To provide compassionate, exceptional and highly reliable care.

2
Good Shepherd Hospice Inc

Good Shepherd Hospice, Inc. provides hospice and palliative care services that relieve the suffering of persons residing in its communities affected by life-limiting illnesses and end-of-life issues so all may live as fully and comfortably…

Health
3
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

4
Covenant HomeCare

Covenant HomeCare provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
5
Bon Secours - Richmond Health System Inc

The mission is to bring compassion to health care and to be good to those in need, especially those who are poor and dying. as a system of caregivers, we commit ourselves to help bring people and communities to health and wholeness.

Health
6
Alliance of Disability Advocates

To serve all north carolinians with significant disabilities by ensuring they can live independently in a barrier-free community of their choice through consumer-controlled, self-directed services.

Religion
7
Atlantic University Inc

Provide post-secondary education of excellence.

Education
8
LifePath Hospice Inc

Lifepath Hospice, Inc. provides hospice services that relieve the suffering of persons residing in its communities affected by life-limiting illnesses and end-of-life issues so all may live as fully and comfortably as possible.

Health
9
Baptist Children's Homes of North Carolina Incorporated

Baptist children's homes of north carolina (bch) is a nonprofit organization that reaches out to children and families in crisis. the agency's mission statement is "sharing hope...changing lives."

Religion
10
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
11
Trinity Continuing Care Services

We, trinity senior living communities and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.trinity continuing care services (d/b/a trinity health senior…

Health
12
Gaston Memorial Hospital Inc

To provide compassionate, exceptional and highly reliable care.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Raleigh Rescue Mission Inc and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHospice Care ServicesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Veteran Support ServicesIndependent K-8 SchoolsLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Animal Rescue and AdoptionChild and Family ServicesLand Conservation Organizat…Cancer Support OrganizationsDevelopmental Disabilities …Homeless Services & ShelterYmca Community CentersPublic University Foundatio…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%4%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%23%10–20yr14%23%20–35yr12%27%35–55yr12%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%11%10–20yr14%16%20–35yr12%29%35–55yr12%44%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/32
the rest of the field
15%
7,957/53,148

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
12/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WAKE MED FOUNDATION — $2,000,000 · OtherWAKE MED FOUNDATIONWAKE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $1,890,070 · OtherWAKE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLSHOSPICE OF WAKE COUNTY INC — $1,050,100 · OtherHOSPICE OF WAKE COUNTY INCCommunity of Hope — $356,625 · OtherCommunity of Hope+25 more — $192,100 · OtherDUKE UNIVERSITY — $1,400,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYDURHAM NATIVITY SCHOOL INC — $547,750 · EducationDURHAM NATIVITY SCHOOL INCWAKE TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $94,660 · Education+2 more — $21,000 · EducationThe Young Men's Christian Association of the Triangle Area Inc (4598) — $250,000 · Human ServicesCanines for Service Inc — $50,000 · Human ServicesGARNER AREA MINISTRIES INC — $25,000 · Human Services+2 more — $5,500 · Human ServicesBASTION COMMUNITY OF RESILIENCE — $300,000 · Public BenefitSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $100,000 · Religion50 LEGS IN 50 DAYS INC — $50,000 · Health+3 more — $300 · HealthImmigrant Defenders Law Center — $50,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$5,488,895Education$2,063,410Human Services$330,500Public Benefit$300,000Religion$100,000Health$50,300Crime & Legal$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $1,400,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF WAKE COUNTY INC — $1,050,100 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetDURHAM NATIVITY SCHOOL INC — $547,750 over 6y, 9.7% of budgetThe Young Men's Christian Association of the Triangle Area Inc (4598) — $250,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWAKE TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $94,660 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetImmigrant Defenders Law Center — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCanines for Service Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetBRISTOL BAY HERITAGE LAND TRUST — $27,500 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetGARNER AREA MINISTRIES INC — $25,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetECOLE BILINGUE DE LA NOUVELLE ORLEANS — $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUILFORD COLLEGE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RALEIGH RESCUE MISSION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetABLE TO SERVE — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSON OF A SAINT — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF WAKE COUNTY INC
  • Who funds DURHAM NATIVITY SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds BASTION COMMUNITY OF RESILIENCE
  • Who funds The Young Men's Christian Association of the Triangle Area Inc (4598)
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds WAKE TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds 50 LEGS IN 50 DAYS INC
  • Who funds Immigrant Defenders Law Center
  • Who funds Canines for Service Inc
  • Who funds BRISTOL BAY HERITAGE LAND TRUST
  • Who funds GARNER AREA MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds ECOLE BILINGUE DE LA NOUVELLE ORLEANS
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE
  • Who funds GUILFORD COLLEGE
  • Who funds THE RALEIGH RESCUE MISSION INC
  • Who funds ABLE TO SERVE
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds AdventHealth Foundation Inc
  • Who funds REX HEALTHCARE INC
  • Who funds Chapters Health Foundation Inc
  • Who funds SON OF A SAINT

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Duke Energy FoundationNC16.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Duke Energy Foundation · The Greater New Orleans Foundation · Triangle Community Foundation Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Yeargan Foundation Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph