Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Wolfe Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$29k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$43kHuman Services$36kInternational$34kEnvironment$32kFood & Nutrition$29kPhilanthropy$28kYouth Development$17kEmployment$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$265k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ULTIMATE IMPACT INC$2,500
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$2,500
planned parenthood$2,500
JEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICES$2,000
THE AFRICAN LIBRARY PROJECT$2,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM$2,000
THE MARFAN FOUNDATION$1,500
SEMPER FI FUND$1,500
HOPE SERVICES$1,000
CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES$1,000
MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM$1,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$1,000
JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDRENS SERVICES$1,000
REEF$1,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $1k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $1k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $1k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $1k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $1k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $1k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $1k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDRENS SERVICES: $1k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
IA
CT
CA
VA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$241k · 26 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
5

Total granted

$241k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+72%

Still filing today

65%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthAnimalsPhilanthropyArts & CultureEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AL
    AFRICAN LIBRARY PROJECT
    9× · 2017–2025 · $18k · revenue +23%
  • UI
    Ultimate Impact Inc
    8× · 2018–2025 · $17k · revenue +84%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    9× · 2017–2025 · $15k · revenue +206%

Funded once

  • CH
    Children's Hospital Corporationgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +91%
  • HT
    HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +72%
  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
2
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
3
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
4
Marine Biological Laboratory

The Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL) is a world-renowned center for biological discovery and training that is notably affiliated with more than 60 Nobel Prize winners. Research is conducted by full-time faculty as well as hundreds of the…

Science & Tech
5
Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles

We steward $1.5 billion in charitable assets through donor-advised funds, endowments, and other giving vehicles. partnering with 1,400 individuals, families, and organizations, we build enduring legacies and multigenerational impact. in…

Philanthropy
6
Sandler Foundation

The foundation operates exclusively for charitable, educational or religious purposes by conducting or supporting activities for the benefit of, or to carry out the purposes of the jewish community federation of san francisco, the…

Philanthropy
7
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
8
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
9
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
10
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
11
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
12
Society for Neuroscience

Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma; the most unlike its peers is Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
20/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

planned parenthood: $19,500 · Otherplanned parenthoodSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $16,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANKTHE MARFAN FOUNDATION INC: $13,500 · OtherTHE MARFAN FOUNDATION INCJEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICES: $12,500 · OtherJEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICESREEF: $9,000 · OtherREEFMEALS ON WHEELS SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $9,000 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS SANTA CLARA COUNTYTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $9,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYTEMPLE B'NAI ABRAHAM: $7,000 · OtherCALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $9,100 · OtherCALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCESHOPE SERVICES: $9,000 · OtherHOPE SERVICESUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $9,000 · OtherUniversity of Illinois FoundationTHE CORAL REEF ALLIANCE: $6,500 · Other+9 more: $23,000 · Other+9 moreAFRICAN LIBRARY PROJECT: $18,100 · InternationalAFRICAN LIBRA…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $15,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIE…+1 more: $1,000 · InternationalJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA: $18,500 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUN…Levy Family Campus: $9,000 · PhilanthropyLevy Family C…THE MONO LAKE FOUNDATION: $6,500 · PhilanthropyTHE MONO LAKE…Nine Lives Foundation: $9,010 · AnimalsMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION: $9,000 · AnimalsUltimate Impact Inc: $17,000 · Youth DevelopmentSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $13,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Corporation: $1,000 · HealthJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $9,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $3,500 · Human Services
Other$152,100International$34,100Philanthropy$34,000Animals$18,010Youth Development$17,000Health$14,000Human Services$12,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA: $18,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAFRICAN LIBRARY PROJECT: $18,100 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetUltimate Impact Inc: $17,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $15,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARFAN FOUNDATION INC: $13,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $13,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $9,100 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNine Lives Foundation: $9,010 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE SERVICES: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLevy Family Campus: $9,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CORAL REEF ALLIANCE: $6,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MONO LAKE FOUNDATION: $6,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JEWISH HOME AND SENIOR LIVING FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF SAN FRANCISCO INC: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCORA Community Overcoming Relationship Abuse: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA ↗
  • Who funds AFRICAN LIBRARY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Ultimate Impact Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds THE MARFAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds Nine Lives Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HOPE SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds University of Illinois Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Levy Family Campus ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds THE CORAL REEF ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds THE MONO LAKE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH HOME AND SENIOR LIVING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF SAN FRANCISCO INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds CORA Community Overcoming Relationship Abuse ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA15× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Wolfe Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Wolfe Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Wolfe Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Wolfe Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Wolfe’s filings →

More from the funding graph