Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Williamson Martin & Brooke Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$215k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$150kReligion$133kHealth$125kInternational$103kYouth Development$95kHousing & Shelter$90kHuman Services$60kEnvironment$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $190k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$370k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEXT DOOR MINISTRIES$35,000
WORLD SPORTS$30,000
SILOAM HEALTH$20,000
SAMARITANS PURSE$15,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$10,000
LOVELADY CENTER$10,000
MISSION TO THE WORLD$10,000
PORTRAITS OF HOPE$10,000
M-POWER MINISTRIES$10,000
REFORMED UNIVERSITY FELLOWSHIP$10,000
JH ISRAEL$10,000
YWCA CENTRAL ALABAMA$10,000
LARKSPUR CONSERVATION$10,000
MISSIONS DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL$5,000
URBAN HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%M-POWER MINISTRIES: $10k → 16%M-POWER MINISTRIES: $10k → 16%LOVELADY CENTER: $10k → 16%LOVELADY CENTER: $10k → 16%LOVELADY CENTER: $10k → 16%LOVELADY CENTER: $10k → 16%LOVELADY CENTER: $10k → 16%YWCA CENTRAL ALABAMA: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
VA
MD
TN
NC
MS
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$933k · 19 repeat orgs$88k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against -81% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
3

Total granted

$933k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
-81%

Still filing today

58%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterInternationalCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TN
    THE NEXT DOOR INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $90k · revenue +73%
  • SH
    SILOAM HEALTH
    5× · 2021–2025 · $75k · revenue +31%
  • LC
    Larkspur Conservation
    5× · 2021–2025 · $50k · revenue +174%

Funded once

  • RU
    RADOOGA USA INC
    one grant, 2022 · $13k · revenue -81%
  • O
    OXFAM
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • K
    KOINONIA
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fsi-Freedom Seekers International

Freedom seekers international is a christian organization that exists to rescue the most severely persecuted for their religious faith in hostile and restrictive countries. through collaborative partnerships we deliver those who are…

Human Services
2
House of Hope International

See schedule oour mission is the integration of women and children into society, transformed through the power of healing and complete discipleship and vocational training within a safe, loving, and serving community. our vision is to see…

Public Safety & Disaster
3
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
4
West African Mercy Ministries Inc

West african mercy ministries is a non-profit, faith-based organization that works in ghana, west africa. our mission is to glorify god and love jesus through mercy ministry. we see this happening as we contagiously champion compassionate…

International
5
Alongside Inc

Restore hope, purpose, passion and relationships among Christian leaders who are making an impact around the world.

Religion
6
Global Outreach Inc

To share Christian compassion and love in an effort to alleviate spiritual, physical, emotional and mental suffering around the world. We help care for orphans and vulnerable children, teens and women in need. We provide training and…

International
7
Alive At Last

Alive at Last helps victims of sexual exploitation and trafficking live free and discover their God-given purpose.

Crime & Legal
8
Selah International Counseling Ministries

The mission of Selah International Counseling Ministries is to glorify God as we serve and equip His church, providing leadership and service through counseling, counseling resources, and counseling training.

Health
9
Pursue Ministries

Pursue Ministries has the mission to pursue an eternal impact by introducing others to Jesus Christ, teaching the Bible and training disciples through one-on-one meetings, small groups, resources, retreats and seminars.

Religion
10
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
11
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
12
Talking Bibles International

The distribution of Talking Bibles worldwide in as many different languages as possible.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Next Door Inc; the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough T1D. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $90,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBSILOAM HEALTH: $75,000 · OtherSILOAM HEALTHNOVO: $60,000 · OtherNOVOLarkspur Conservation: $50,000 · OtherLarkspur ConservationREFORMED UNIVERSITY FELLOWSHIP: $50,000 · OtherREFORMED UNIVERSITY FELLOWSHIPURBAN HOPE: $35,000 · OtherURBAN HOPESAMARATIN'S PURSE: $30,000 · OtherJUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATI: $20,000 · Other+10 more: $90,000 · Other+10 moreWORLD SPORTS INC: $150,000 · Recreation & SportsWORLD SPORTS INCTHE NEXT DOOR INC: $90,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE NEXT D…FREEDOM RAIN INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesM-POWER Ministries: $20,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSN OF BIRMINGHAM: $10,000 · Human ServicesJH ISRAEL: $20,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $15,000 · ReligionRADOOGA USA INC: $12,500 · ReligionMISSIONS DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL: $37,500 · InternationalTHE HUMAN TRAFFICKING INSTITUTE: $15,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$600,000Recreation & Sports$150,000Housing & Shelter$90,000Human Services$80,000Religion$47,500International$37,500Crime & Legal$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWORLD SPORTS INC: $150,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetTHE NEXT DOOR INC: $90,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSILOAM HEALTH: $75,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetLarkspur Conservation: $50,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetFREEDOM RAIN INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMISSIONS DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL: $37,500 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetJH ISRAEL: $20,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetM-POWER Ministries: $20,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE HUMAN TRAFFICKING INSTITUTE: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRADOOGA USA INC: $12,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WORLD SPORTS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NEXT DOOR INC ↗
  • Who funds SILOAM HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds Larkspur Conservation ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM RAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSIONS DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds JH ISRAEL ↗
  • Who funds M-POWER Ministries ↗
  • Who funds THE HUMAN TRAFFICKING INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds RADOOGA USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSN OF BIRMINGHAM ↗
  • Who funds Portraits of Hope Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS17.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Williamson Martin & Brooke Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Williamson Martin & Brooke Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Williamson Martin & Brooke Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph