Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Williams Brice Edwards Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$5.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
36
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$1.7M
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Public Benefit$7.1MArts & Culture$5.7MEducation$4.3MHousing & Shelter$3.9MRecreation & Sports$2.5MYouth Development$1.7MHuman Services$1.1MHealth$826kOther$0
02FY2024 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $357k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $1.1M
  • $250k+7 grants · $4.1M
$35,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$57M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY OF SUMTER$1,700,000
SUMTER COUNTY MUSEUM$803,500
Individual grant recipient$500,000
CAMP COLE$300,000
WILSON HALL$300,000
YMCA$275,000
SOUTH CAROLINA ETV$254,567
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$216,000
LIBERTY STEAM CHARTER SCHOOL$200,000
Individual grant recipient$150,000
THOMAS SUMTER EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATIO$145,000
MORRIS COLLEGE$100,000
Individual grant recipient$100,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$75,000
UNITED MINISTRIES$60,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 28%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%WINNERS TRAVEL FOUNDATION INC: $20k → 28%WINNERS TRAVEL FOUNDATION INC: $20k → 28%WINNERS TRAVEL FOUNDATION INC: $15k → 28%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 16% of The Williams Brice Edwards Charitable Trust’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in SC; by stated purpose, 90%.

The Williams Brice Edwards Charitable Trustlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$28M · 40 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

40 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
32

Total granted

$28M
$993k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+84%

Still filing today

50%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $598k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    SUMTER MUSEUM
    6× · 2019–2024 · $2.8M · revenue +857% · 65% of their budget
  • WH
    WILSON HALL
    6× · 2019–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +44%
  • MC
    Morris College
    6× · 2019–2024 · $600k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • TS
    THOMAS SUMTER ACADEMY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $160k · revenue +52%
  • MH
    MUSC HOLLINGS CANCER CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • SC
    SUMTER COUNTY DEVELOPMENTALgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue +84% · 42% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sumter County Commission On Alcohol and Drug Abuse

Empowering people in sumter county sc to live free from substance abuse through a continuum of high quality services.

Health
2
South Carolina Public Interest Foundation
Crime & Legal
3
Sumter Historic Trust Inc

To promote the preservation of historical strucures and sites through the collection of funds to be used for this purpose.

Arts & Culture
4
Greater Sumter Chamber of Commerce

To promote business climate and industrial growth in the sumter area

—
5
Sumter County Fine Arts Council

Cultural enrichment through arts programs

Arts & Culture
6
C P Legacy Foundation of Sumter Sc Inc
Housing & Shelter
7
South Carolina Manufacturing Extension Partnership

SCMEP is a strategic advisor, promoting business growth and connecting manufacturers to public and private resources essential to their achieving increased competitiveness and profitability. See Sch O for additional information.

Community Improvement
8
Sc Thrive

The organization leads South Carolinians to stability by providing innovative and efficient access to quality of life resources.

Science & Tech
9
South Carolina Independent Colleges and Universities

Scicu seeks to advance higher education in south carolina through fundraising, scholarships, research, as well as facilitating collaborative activities among the member institutions. scicu also enhances a positive public image and…

Education
10
South Carolina Business & Industry Political Education Committee

Promoting and protecting the free private and competitive enterprise system through research and education.

—
11
Southern Methodist College

The college's mission is to train christians to serve god and his church.

Education
12
Sumter Schools Enhancement Foundation Inc

To support the educational activities of the Sumter County School District.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sumter United Ministries; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

7
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
24/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF SUMTER: $7,130,000 · OtherCITY OF SUMTERIndividual grant recipient: $2,375,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $1,800,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSUMTER COUNTY MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $1,720,500 · OtherSUMTER COUNTY MUSEUM FOUNDATIONSUMTER CHARTER SCHOOL: $1,000,000 · OtherYMCA: $725,000 · Other+59 more: $4,068,050 · Other+59 moreCITY OF SUMTER HOUSING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $3,325,000 · Housing & ShelterCITY OF SUMTE…FULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING OF MCCORMICK SC INC: $255,000 · Housing & ShelterFULLER CENTER…SUMTER MUSEUM: $2,823,500 · Arts & CultureSUMTER MUSEUMETV Endowment of South Carolina Inc: $346,090 · Arts & CultureETV Endowment…SUMTER GALLERY OF ART: $208,000 · Arts & CultureSUMTER GALLER…SUMTER LITTLE THEATRE INC: $125,000 · Arts & CultureWILSON HALL: $1,520,000 · EducationWILSON HA…Morris College: $600,000 · EducationMorris Co…LIBERTY STEAM CHARTER SCHOOL: $200,000 · EducationLIBERTY S…THOMAS SUMTER ACADEMY INC: $160,000 · EducationTHOMAS SU…+2 more: $65,000 · EducationUNITED MINISTRIES: $460,000 · ReligionCENTRAL CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $230,000 · PhilanthropySUMTER EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $100,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $10,000 · PhilanthropyAmerican Heart Association Inc: $216,000 · HealthSUMTER PREGNANCY CENTER: $20,000 · Health
Other$18,818,550Housing & Shelter$3,580,000Arts & Culture$3,502,590Education$2,545,000Religion$460,000Philanthropy$340,000Health$236,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCITY OF SUMTER HOUSING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $3,325,000 over 3y, 74% of budgetSUMTER MUSEUM: $2,823,500 over 6y, 65% of budgetSUMTER COUNTY MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $1,720,500 over 4y, 76% of budgetWILSON HALL: $1,520,000 over 6y, 3.6% of budgetMorris College: $600,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetUNITED MINISTRIES: $460,000 over 5y, 4.5% of budgetETV Endowment of South Carolina Inc: $346,090 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetFULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING OF MCCORMICK SC INC: $255,000 over 3y, 77% of budgetCENTRAL CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $230,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $216,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUMTER GALLERY OF ART: $208,000 over 6y, 31% of budgetPEE DEE COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL ASSAULT: $200,500 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetLIBERTY STEAM CHARTER SCHOOL: $200,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $155,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSUMTER LITTLE THEATRE INC: $125,000 over 5y, 39% of budgetSUMTER COUNTY DEVELOPMENTAL: $100,000 over 1y, 42% of budgetALSTON WILKES SOCIETY: $65,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWINNERS TRAVEL FOUNDATION INC: $55,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetSPARTANBURG METHODIST COLLEGE: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMidlands Fatherhood Coalition: $43,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetSumter United Ministries: $40,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetPALMETTO TRAIL: $25,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetCONGAREE LAND TRUST: $25,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetSUMTER PREGNANCY CENTER: $20,000 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetTRACY'S CAMP INC: $20,000 over 1y, 9.9% of budgetDavidson College: $15,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSUMTER SOCCER CLUB: $15,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetNEW MORNING: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSERVE AND CONNECT: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSOUTH CAROLINA POLICY COUNCIL EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CITY OF SUMTER HOUSING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds SUMTER MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds SUMTER COUNTY MUSEUM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WILSON HALL ↗
  • Who funds Morris College ↗
  • Who funds UNITED MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds ETV Endowment of South Carolina Inc ↗
  • Who funds FULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING OF MCCORMICK SC INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds SUMTER GALLERY OF ART ↗
  • Who funds PEE DEE COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL ASSAULT ↗
  • Who funds LIBERTY STEAM CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS SUMTER ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds SUMTER LITTLE THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds SUMTER COUNTY DEVELOPMENTAL ↗
  • Who funds SAVING SUMTER'S STRAYS INC ↗
  • Who funds SUMTER EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE SUMTER COUNTY LIBRAR ↗
  • Who funds ALSTON WILKES SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds WINNERS TRAVEL FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Central Carolina Community FoundationSC34.5× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Central Carolina Community Foundation · Glenmore & May Sharp Trust · Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Lipscomb Family Foundation · The Sunshine Foundation Inc · The Leon Levine Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Williams Brice Edwards Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Williams Brice Edwards Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Williams Brice Edwards Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to The Williams Brice Edwards Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 83 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Williams Brice Edwards’ filings →

    More from the funding graph