Skip to content

Louisiana · Private foundation

The William and Mary Louise Christovich Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$40k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
14
Grants FY2025
12
Organizations funded FY2024
50%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$1,500
Largest grant, FY2025
$10,000
Organizations funded a year
5 to 13
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
6
Total assets, FY2025
$645k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 50% of the organizations The William and Mary Louise Christovich Charitable Foundation Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 54% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationAnimalsArts & CultureEnvironmentHuman ServicesInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving14$40k50%
FY202412$24k50%
FY202313$33k46%
FY20228$32k38%
FY20216$27k17%
FY20206$24k33%
FY20197$24k29%
FY20185$15k20%
92% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$106kEducation$36kArts & Culture$34kReligion$17kAnimals$15kEnvironment$9kYouth Development$2kPhilanthropy$1kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
CT
CA
VA
LA
MS
TX

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 22 grantees
All grantees of The William and Mary Louise Christovich Charitable Foundation Inc by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Children's Tumor Foundation$51,75080%
Team Gleason Foundation$38,25030%
The Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund$16,00060%
Humane Society of South Mississippi$14,62540%
St John's Presbyterian Church of Rancho Park$14,0002n/a
Greater New Orleans Educational Television Foundation$10,80020%
Greater New Orleans Youth Orchestra$7,97571%
Preservation Alliance of New Orleans In$7,50010%
As & Aces$5,55770%
Pontchartrain Conservancy$3,70030%
Teaching Responsible Earth Education TREE$3,0001n/a
New Orleans Museum of Art$2,88610%
Washington and Lee University$2,50010%
Louisiana Bucket Brigade$2,50010%
Ecole Bilingue de la Nouvelle Orleans$2,30020%
Church of the Annunciation$2,0001n/a
Holy Cross School$2,0001n/a
Covenant House New Orleans$1,50010%
Americares Foundation Inc$1,00010%
Second Harvest Food Bank Greater New Orleans and Acadiana$1,00010%
Children's Cancer Research Fund$1,00010%
St Tammany Humane Society D/B/A Northshore Humane Society$50010%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 11 recipients with no EIN on record ($38k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget The William and Mary Louise Christovich Charitable Foundation Inc supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetChildren's Tumor Foundation: $51,750 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTeam Gleason Foundation: $38,250 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetThe Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund: $16,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHumane Society of South Mississippi: $14,625 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetGreater New Orleans Educational Television Foundation: $10,800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGreater New Orleans Youth Orchestra: $7,975 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetPreservation Alliance of New Orleans In: $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAs & Aces: $5,557 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetPontchartrain Conservancy: $3,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNew Orleans Museum of Art: $2,886 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWashington and Lee University: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLouisiana Bucket Brigade: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEcole Bilingue de la Nouvelle Orleans: $2,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCovenant House New Orleans: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmericares Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSecond Harvest Food Bank Greater New Orleans and Acadiana: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Cancer Research Fund: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSt Tammany Humane Society D/B/A Northshore Humane Society: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 18.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater New Orleans FoundationLA21.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater New Orleans Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Ella West Freeman Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The William and Mary Louise Christovich Charitable Foundation Inc with peer funders

About The William and Mary Louise Christovich Charitable Foundation Inc

How much does The William and Mary Louise Christovich Charitable Foundation Inc give?
The William and Mary Louise Christovich Charitable Foundation Inc reported 14 grants totaling $40,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 5 and 13 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does The William and Mary Louise Christovich Charitable Foundation Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Health (46%), Education (16%), Arts & Culture (15%).
Who are The William and Mary Louise Christovich Charitable Foundation Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Children's Tumor Foundation ($52k), Team Gleason Foundation ($38k), The Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund ($16k).
Does The William and Mary Louise Christovich Charitable Foundation Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 50% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The William and Mary Louise Christovich Charitable Foundation Inc accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The William and Mary Louise Christovich Charitable Foundation Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Greater New Orleans Foundation, Shell USA Company Foundation, Ella West Freeman Foundation.
Where is The William and Mary Louise Christovich Charitable Foundation Inc based?
The William and Mary Louise Christovich Charitable Foundation Inc is based in LA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on William and Mary Louise Christovich’s filings →

More from the funding graph