Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Wilfred J Minkus Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$89k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$157kEducation$149kInternational$111kRecreation & Sports$72kHuman Services$27kArts & Culture$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$8kEnvironment$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $55k
$8,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
GABRIEL PROJECT MUMBAI$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
CAMP RAMAH IN WISCONSIN$8,000
SOLOMON SCHECHTER DAY SCHOOL$8,000
ROCHELLE ZELL JEWISH HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
CHICAGO JEWISH DAY SCHOOL$5,000
SVIVAH$5,000
LIBENU$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LIBENU: $3k → 14%LIBENU: $3k → 14%LIBENU: $2k → 14%JEWISH CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES: $14k → 14%LIBENU: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$473k · 12 repeat orgs$120k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +65% since the first grant, against -16% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
9

Total granted

$473k
$64k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
-16%

Still filing today

50%
89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalEducationHuman ServicesArts & CulturePublic Safety & DisasterReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GP
    Gabriel Project Mumbai
    8× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +65%
  • RZ
    ROCHELLE ZELL JEWISH HIGH SCHOOL
    7× · 2018–2024 · $53k · revenue +7%
  • CJ
    CHICAGO JEWISH DAY SCHOOL
    6× · 2018–2024 · $33k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • JC
    Jewish Child and Family Services
    one grant, 2021 · $14k · revenue +6%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -45%
  • A
    ADL
    one grant, 2023 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Nochim & Rivka Zeldes Foundation
2
Sherit Isroel
3
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
4
Aishel Hatzedek
International
5
Greater Miami Hillel Foundation Inc

The mission of the organization is to enrich the lives of jewish undergraduate and graduate students so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world.

6
University of Judaism Foundation
7
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
8
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
9
Yad Laniyim
Philanthropy
10
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
11
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
12
Vaad Hapula Inc

Support jewry in Israel

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hazon Inc and the most unlike its peers is No Shame On U Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

OROT — $91,000 · OtherOROTCAMP RAMAH — $64,000 · OtherCAMP RAMAHTHE ARK — $58,000 · OtherTHE ARKSOLOMON SCHECTER DAY SCHOOL — $52,500 · OtherSOLOMON SCHECTER DAY SCHOOLAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE — $16,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $15,000 · Other+7 more — $45,000 · Other+7 moreGabriel Project Mumbai — $80,000 · InternationalGabriel Project Mu…FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $10,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISR…ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE — $5,000 · InternationalROCHELLE ZELL JEWISH HIGH SCHOOL — $52,500 · EducationROCHELLE ZELL JE…CHICAGO JEWISH DAY SCHOOL — $33,000 · EducationCHICAGO JEWISH D…NO SHAME ON U INC — $3,000 · EducationJewish Child and Family Services — $14,000 · Human ServicesLIBENU — $10,000 · Human ServicesFOOTSTEPS INC — $3,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC — $10,000 · Arts & CultureSVIVAH INC — $8,000 · ReligionISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC — $8,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$356,500International$95,000Education$88,500Human Services$27,000Arts & Culture$10,000Religion$8,000Public Safety & Disaster$8,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGabriel Project Mumbai — $80,000 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetROCHELLE ZELL JEWISH HIGH SCHOOL — $52,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetCHICAGO JEWISH DAY SCHOOL — $33,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetJewish Child and Family Services — $14,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIBENU — $10,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSVIVAH INC — $8,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC — $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOTSTEPS INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNO SHAME ON U INC — $3,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAZON INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Gabriel Project Mumbai
  • Who funds ROCHELLE ZELL JEWISH HIGH SCHOOL
  • Who funds CHICAGO JEWISH DAY SCHOOL
  • Who funds Jewish Child and Family Services
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC
  • Who funds LIBENU
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
  • Who funds SVIVAH INC
  • Who funds ISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC
  • Who funds ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE
  • Who funds FOOTSTEPS INC
  • Who funds NO SHAME ON U INC
  • Who funds MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger
  • Who funds HAZON INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arie and Ida Crown MemorialIL15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Charles and M R Shapiro Foundation Inc · Maury and Nancy Fertig Family Foundation · Upstart Bay Area · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Wilfred J Minkus Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Wilfred J Minkus Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to The Wilfred J Minkus Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph