· Public charity
Upstart Bay Area
To accelerate growth, nurture ideas, and advance new experiences for the jewish community by connecting impact-driven entrepreneurs to expertise, community, and capital.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 31 grants below total $1,829,923 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,955,441 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $125,518 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $18k
- $10k–50k15 grants · $314k
- $50k–250k12 grants · $1.2M
- $250k+1 grant · $277k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FJC - A Foundation of Philan | $276,997 |
| GATHER CONSULTING | $235,500 |
| SOCIAL GOOD FUND | $103,862 |
| JEWFOLK INC | $101,350 |
| TIDES CENTER | $101,117 |
| JEWISH FERTILITY FOUNDATION | $101,072 |
| LEHRHAUS | $100,511 |
| AMMUD THE JOC TORAH ACADEMY | $100,000 |
| THEIRSTORY INC | $100,000 |
| CONSCIOUS BUILDERS | $86,900 |
| Embodied Jewish Learning | $80,308 |
| ALEPH Alliance for Jewish Ren | $60,000 |
| THE EFSHAR PROJECT | $50,350 |
| Mitsui Collective | $40,000 |
| The InHEIRitance Project | $33,249 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $531k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 58% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 6% of Upstart Bay Area’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +68% since the first grant, against +35% for the ones you funded once.
53 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 38 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $607k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- 4E4G44 ESports Inc Lost Tribe5× · 2019–2023 · $1.9M · revenue +210% · 74% of their budget
- TGTRYBAL GATHERINGS INC2× · 2019–2020 · $377k · revenue +97% · 40% of their budget
- TMTkiya Music Inc4× · 2019–2022 · $180k · revenue +68% · 29% of their budget
Funded once
- BIBOUNDLESS ISRAEL INCone grant, 2022 · $200k · revenue +7%
- BBBELOVED BUILDERS INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $141k · revenue +120%
- 7F70 FACES MEDIA INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $115k · revenue +99%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Judaism unbound is a digitally driven, radically open center for education and serves as a catalyst for an entirely new era of judaism. we empower regular jews who are to develop new ways of living jewishly.
Founded in 2017, the Jewish Center for Justice (JCJ) is a distinguished social justice, education, and leadership development platform that meets each individual where they are in their journey to inspire change. JCJ's mission is to…
Our vision is to develop ethical, impactful Jewish young adult leaders to ensure a vibrant Jewish community and make the world a better place. Our mission is to empower and engage Jewish young adults through leadership development and…
Connect israel is a life-long program that aims to strengthen the gap between american jews and israelis through business, creative teamwork, and developing personal relationships.
To create a dynamic community of Jews, nourished by mutual respect and honest, open dialogue, challenging stereotypes, invigorating curiosity, plumbing the depths of their great heritage and empowering a revolution in Jewish identity. In…
Offering jewish adults a personal connection to judaism,fostering a sense of belonging to the greater jewishcommunity, and building bridges between jews of allbackgrounds. to date, over 74,000 men and women from 39countries have been…
Ijs's mission is to develop and teach jewish spiritual practices so that individuals and communities may experience greater awareness, purpose, and interconnection.
The Jewish Film Institute champions bold films and filmmakers that expand and evolve the Jewish story for audiences everywhere. Through its exhibition and artist development programs, JFI celebrates the spirit of film, inquiry,…
The jewish electorate institute (jei) is an independent, non-partisan 501(c)(3) organization that surveys, interprets, reports, and educates the public about the perspectives, voting behaviors, and motivations of the american jewish…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Judaism Your Way and the most unlike its peers is Rappers and Rebbes Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 12 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
78 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 78 of the 103 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds 4G44 ESports Inc Lost Tribe ↗
- Who funds FJC ↗
- Who funds TRYBAL GATHERINGS INC ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC ↗
- Who funds BOUNDLESS ISRAEL INC ↗
- Who funds Tkiya Music Inc ↗
- Who funds SACRED SPACES ↗
- Who funds UPSTART BAY AREA ↗
- Who funds ALEPH Alliance for Jewish Renewal ↗
- Who funds BELOVED BUILDERS INC ↗
- Who funds ADVOT ↗
- Who funds SISTERHOOD OF SALAAM SHALOM ↗
- Who funds JQY ↗
- Who funds ISH FESTIVAL ↗
- Who funds 70 FACES MEDIA INC ↗
- Who funds PRESENTENSE GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds RAMAH IN THE ROCKIES ↗
- Who funds JUDAISM YOUR WAY ↗
- Who funds Jewish Farmer Network ↗
- Who funds THEATRE DYBBUK ↗
- Who funds MISSION EDGE SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds JEWFOLK MEDIA INC ↗
- Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FERTILITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE DOROTHY AND MYER S KRIPKE INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH FAMILY LITERACY ↗
- Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE ↗
- Who funds TZEDEK AMERICA ↗
- Who funds TIVNU BUILDING JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds Blue Dove Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds EDEN VILLAGE CAMP INC ↗
- Who funds JEWS FOR RACIAL & ECONOMIC JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds GROWTORAH INC ↗
- Who funds ZIONESS MOVEMENT INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Shimon Ben Joseph Foundation Dba Jim Joseph Foundation · Covenant Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc · Fjc · Jewish Communal Fund · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · Jewish Federation Council of Greater La · The Harold Grinspoon Foundation · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Upstart Bay Area funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Sharsheret Inc — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.