Skip to content
The Warrington Foundation Co Fifth Third at a glance

· Private foundation

The Warrington Foundation Co Fifth Third

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15M
Granted FY2022
116
Grants FY2022
18
States reached
$3.4M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2022.

Philanthropy$14MArts & Culture$467kEducation$327kEnvironment$296kReligion$221kHuman Services$203kAnimals$157kRecreation & Sports$123kOther$0
02FY2022 · 116 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k70 grants · $245k
  • $10k–50k42 grants · $641k
  • $250k+4 grants · $14M
$5,000
Median grant
18
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LESLIE WARRINGTON BAILEY FDTN$3,440,069
SAMUEL BAILEY FAMILY FDTN$3,440,069
BAILEY LAMSON FAMILY FDTN$3,440,069
KOA CHARITABLE TRUST$3,440,069
UNITED ARTS OF CENTRAL FL INC$45,000
THE INDIAN HILL CHURCH$37,500
ALL SAINTS CHURCH FOUNDATION OF$25,000
SUN VALLEY INSTITUTE FOR RESILIENCE INC$25,000
CHRISTIAN CAMPS INC$25,000
WOOD RIVER COMMUNITY YMCA$25,000
AGNES IRWIN SCHOOL$25,000
TRINITY COLLEGE$25,000
OUR COMPANIONS DOMESTIC ANIMAL$20,000
ROCKY MOUNTAIN WILD INCORPORATED$17,000
THE NEW SCHOOL$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $106k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 58% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SUN VALLEY INSTITUTE FOR RESILIENCE INC: $25k → 7%LAKER TRANSPORTATION PROJECT INC: $15k → 14%THE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES & CHILDREN INC: $10k → 11%THE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES & CHILDREN INC: $8k → 11%THE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES & CHILDREN INC: $8k → 11%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC: $1k → 8%SUN VALLEY INSTITUTE FOR RESILIENCE INC: $10k → 7%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC: $1k → 8%GIFTS OF LOVE INC: $4k → 11%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC: $1k → 8%GIFTS OF LOVE INC: $4k → 11%CHILDCARE RESOURCES OF INDIAN: $2k → 12%SUN VALLEY INSTITUTE FOR RESILIENCE INC: $5k → 7%STEPPING STONES INC: $5k → 16%STEPPING STONES INC: $3k → 16%FLOURISH FOUNDATION: $500 → 7%STEPPING STONES INC: $3k → 16%FLOURISH FOUNDATION: $500 → 7%FLOURISH FOUNDATION: $500 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NH
ID
MT
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
NC
SC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

11%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 84 repeat orgs$14M to everyone else

84 repeat relationships: 67 still active in FY2022, 17 since wound down; 46 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

84
12

Total granted

$1.7M
$78k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+47%

Still filing today

70%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 4% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22
Arts & CultureEnvironmentEducationHuman ServicesAnimalsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TRINITY COLLEGE
    3× · 2020–2022 · $75k · revenue +34%
  • TA
    THE AGNES IRWIN SCHOOL
    3× · 2020–2022 · $60k · revenue +65%
  • GT
    GRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY
    3× · 2020–2022 · $54k · revenue +230%

Funded once

  • BF
    BEA FOR KIDS FAMILY OFFICE SERVICES
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
  • TS
    THE SPUR FOUNDATIONWARM SPRINGS
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
2
The Land Trust for Tennessee Inc

To conserve the unique character of tennessee's natural and historic landscapes and sites for future generations.

Environment
3
Connecticut Farmland Trust Inc

Protect Connecticuts farmland for agricultural use by purchasing and accepting donations of agricultural conservation easements

Food & Nutrition
4
New Canaan Land Conservation Trust Inc

The mission of the new canaan land trust is to foster a connection between the new canaan community and its natural resources through the conservation and sustainable stewardship of our open space.

—
5
Lake Champlain Land Trust Inc

The mission of the lake champlain land trust is to save the scenic beauty, natural communities, and recreational amenities of lake champlain by permanently preserving significant islands, shoreline areas, and natural communities in the…

Environment
6
Conservation Legacy

Conservation legacy engages future leaders who protect, restore, and enhance our nation's lands through community-based service.in 2024, conservation legacy engaged 2,524 participants who completed over 1.5 million service hours on public…

Youth Development
7
Kennebunk Land Trust

Kennebunk Land Trust's mission is to permanently conserve and steward land to benefit natural and human communities.

Environment
8
Institute for Conservation Leadership

To support healthy communities and a healthy earth, the institute for conservation leadership strengthens leaders, organizations, coalitions and networks.

Community Improvement
9
Minnesota Land Trust

The minnesota land trust protects and restores minnesota's most vital natural lands in order to provide wildlife habitat, clean water, outdoor experiences and scenic beauty for generations to come.

Environment
10
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
11
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
12
Wilton Land Conservation Trust

Protecting, enhancing and conserving open spaces encompassing meadows, woodlands, wetlands, and waterways in the town of wilton ct.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cincinnati Museum Association; the most unlike its peers is Samuel Bailey Family Fdtn. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

104 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 104 of the 145 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
29
Early backer (in before they grew)
102/104
Grantees still filing
74/104
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAMUEL BAILEY FAMILY FDTN: $3,440,069 · OtherSAMUEL BAILEY FAMILY FDTNKOA CHARITABLE TRUST: $3,440,069 · OtherKOA CHARITABLE TRUST+71 more: $1,013,334 · Other+71 moreBAILEY LAMSON FAMILY FDTN: $3,440,069 · PhilanthropyBAILEY LAMSON FAMILY FDTNLESLIE WARRINGTON BAILEY FDTN: $3,440,069 · PhilanthropyLESLIE WARRINGTON BAILEY FDTN+5 more: $68,332 · PhilanthropyTAFT MUSEUM OF ART: $43,500 · Arts & CultureVERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART INC: $42,000 · Arts & CultureSUN VALLEY PERFORMING ARTS INC: $36,000 · Arts & CultureNANTUCKET PRESERVATION TRUST INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureThe Cincinnati Ballet Company Inc: $23,000 · Arts & CultureThe Contemporary Arts Center: $22,000 · Arts & CultureKnow Theatre of Cincinnati: $20,500 · Arts & CultureCINCINNATI MEMORIAL HALL SOCIETY: $16,000 · Arts & CultureCINCINNATI MUSEUM ASSOCIATION: $15,000 · Arts & CultureTHE LIBERTY THEATRE COMPANY: $15,000 · Arts & CultureNANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $15,000 · Arts & CultureCincinnati Institute of Fine Arts: $14,500 · Arts & CultureCINCINNATI MUSEUM CENTER: $13,000 · Arts & Culture+11 more: $39,000 · Arts & CultureTRINITY COLLEGE: $75,000 · EducationTHE AGNES IRWIN SCHOOL: $60,000 · EducationTHE NEW SCHOOL INC: $37,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE LAWRENCEVILLE SCHOOL: $28,500 · EducationSALISBURY SCHOOL INC: $25,000 · EducationThe Community Library Association Inc: $20,000 · EducationHARTFORD YOUTH SCHOLARS INC: $16,000 · Education+5 more: $24,334 · EducationGRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY: $54,000 · EnvironmentROCKY MOUNTAIN WILD: $37,000 · EnvironmentNANTUCKET CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · EnvironmentTHE HILLSIDE TRUST: $12,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $11,500 · EnvironmentINDIAN RIVER LAND TRUST INC: $10,000 · EnvironmentPEOPLE AND POLLINATORS ACTION NETWORK: $9,000 · EnvironmentNatureServe: $8,000 · Environment+4 more: $16,000 · EnvironmentSUN VALLEY INSTITUTE FOR RESILIENCE: $40,000 · Human ServicesTHE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN: $26,000 · Human ServicesLAKER TRANSPORTATION PROJECT INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesSTEPPING STONES INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesGIFTS OF LOVE INC: $8,000 · Human ServicesSEMINOLE COUNTY VICTIMS' RIGHTS COALITION INC: $5,000 · Human Services+3 more: $6,500 · Human ServicesLABRADOR RETRIEVER RESCUE OF FLORIDA INC: $30,000 · AnimalsZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF CINCINNATI: $25,000 · AnimalsFINGER LAKES SPCA OF CENTRAL NEW YORK: $7,500 · AnimalsCentral New York Cat Coalition Inc: $7,500 · AnimalsDOBERMAN RESCUE LEAGUE INC: $5,000 · AnimalsNANTUCKET SAFE HARBOR FOR ANIMALS INC: $5,000 · AnimalsDOBIE RANCH RESCUE INC: $5,000 · Animals+1 more: $1,000 · Animals
Other$7,893,472Philanthropy$6,948,470Arts & Culture$339,500Education$285,834Environment$187,500Human Services$110,500Animals$86,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRINITY COLLEGE: $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AGNES IRWIN SCHOOL: $60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY: $54,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTAFT MUSEUM OF ART: $43,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetVERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART INC: $42,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSUN VALLEY INSTITUTE FOR RESILIENCE: $40,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetTHE NEW SCHOOL INC: $37,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCincinnati Parks Foundation: $37,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN WILD: $37,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetSUN VALLEY PERFORMING ARTS INC: $36,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP FOUNDATION: $33,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNANTUCKET CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNANTUCKET ATHENEUM INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetLABRADOR RETRIEVER RESCUE OF FLORIDA INC: $30,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE LAWRENCEVILLE SCHOOL: $28,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN: $26,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSALISBURY SCHOOL INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET PRESERVATION TRUST INC: $25,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetCREALDE ARTS INC: $25,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetNATIONAL CHARITABLE FUND INC: $25,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF CINCINNATI: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChristian Camps Inc dba Deerfoot Lodge & Subsidiary: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetThe Cincinnati Ballet Company Inc: $23,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe Contemporary Arts Center: $22,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetKnow Theatre of Cincinnati: $20,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetTHE HUNGER AND HEALTH COALITION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetThe Community Library Association Inc: $20,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $18,332 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHARTFORD YOUTH SCHOLARS INC: $16,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCINCINNATI MEMORIAL HALL SOCIETY: $16,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetCINCINNATI MUSEUM ASSOCIATION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LIBERTY THEATRE COMPANY: $15,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetNANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCincinnati Institute of Fine Arts: $14,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCINCINNATI MUSEUM CENTER: $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HILLSIDE TRUST: $12,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetLA SOUPE INC: $12,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $11,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFREESTORE FOODBANK INC: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetProKids: $10,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPPING STONES INC: $10,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetORLANDO MUSEUM OF ART INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJOHN'S ISLAND COMMUNITY SERVICE LEAGUE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCommunity Foundation for Nantucket Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINDIAN RIVER LAND TRUST INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMatthew 25 Ministries Inc: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMutual Dance Theatre and Arts Centers: $10,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.

Koa Charitable TrustLeslie Warrington Bai…Samuel Bailey Family …Bailey Lamson Family …Spur Community Founda…Louise Taft Semple Fo…The Frances R Luther …The Thomas J Emery Me…The Greater Cincinnat…Josephine S Russell C…Charles H Dater Found…Andrew Jergens Founda…
Koa Charitable TrustOH47.4× affinity20 shared granteesties to 1 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Koa Charitable Trust · Leslie Warrington Bailey Fdtn · Samuel Bailey Family Fdtn · Bailey Lamson Family Fdtn · Spur Community Foundation Inc · Louise Taft Semple Foundation · The Frances R Luther Charitable Trust · The Thomas J Emery Memorial · The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Josephine S Russell Charitable · Charles H Dater Foundation Inc · Andrew Jergens Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Warrington Foundation Co Fifth Third funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Warrington Foundation Co Fifth Third. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 140%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • The Village for Families and Children: 50% of income from government
  • Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Nantucket Maria Mitchell Association in: 9% of income from government
  • New England Life Flight Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc: 4% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Middlebury College: 1% of income from government
  • Nantucket Historical Association: 1% of income from government
  • Indian River Land Trust Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Trinity College: 0% of income from government
  • Ballet Vero Beach Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Aurora Women and Girls Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Artists Association of Nantucket Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Orlando Museum of Art Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
14get no government money at all
24report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 145 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Warrington Foundation Co Fifth Third’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home