Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Warren & Bernice Hensel Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$28k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$31kFood & Nutrition$24kArts & Culture$18kAnimals$17kHealth$14kEducation$12kYouth Development$10kHousing & Shelter$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$309k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CINCINNATI MUSEUM CENTER$2,000
WGUC - CINTI PUBLIC RADIO$2,000
MIAMI PROJECT TO CURE PARALYSIS$2,000
CINTI LAB RETRIEVERS RESCUE$2,000
CRAYONS TO COMPUTERS$2,000
WCET$2,000
FREESTORE FOODBANK$2,000
SALVATION ARMY$2,000
NEEDIEST KIDS OF ALL$2,000
SHELTERHOUSE GROUP$1,000
WOMEN HELPING WOMEN$1,000
CINCINNATI HABITIAT FOR HUMANITY$1,000
THE ABILITY CENTER$1,000
LA SOUPE$1,000
NEWPATH CHILD & FAMILY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MIAMI PROJECT TO CURE PARALYSIS: $2k → 15%JOSH CARES: $1k → 6%CINCINNATI MUSEUM CENTER: $2k → 16%THE ABILITY CENTER: $1k → 18%MIAMI PROJECT TO CURE PARALYSIS: $2k → 15%CINCINNATI MUSEUM CENTER: $2k → 16%THE ABILITY CENTER: $1k → 18%MIAMI PROJECT TO CURE PARALYSIS: $2k → 15%SHELTERHOUSE GROUP: $1k → 16%THE ABILITY CENTER: $1k → 18%MIAMI PROJECT TO CURE PARALYSIS: $2k → 15%SHELTERHOUSE GROUP: $1k → 16%THE ABILITY CENTER: $1k → 18%MIAMI PROJECT TO CURE PARALYSIS: $2k → 15%SHELTERHOUSE GROUP: $1k → 16%THE ABILITY CENTER: $1k → 18%MIAMI PROJECT TO CURE PARALYSIS: $2k → 15%SHELTERHOUSE GROUP: $1k → 16%THE ABILITY CENTER: $1k → 18%SHELTERHOUSE GROUP: $1k → 16%SHELTERHOUSE GROUP: $1k → 16%LA SOUPE: $1k → 16%LA SOUPE: $1k → 16%LA SOUPE: $1k → 16%LA SOUPE: $1k → 16%LA SOUPE: $1k → 16%LA SOUPE: $1k → 16%FREESTORE FOODBANK: $2k → 16%WCET: $2k → 16%FREESTORE FOODBANK: $2k → 16%WGUC - CINTI PUBLIC RADIO: $2k → 16%CRAYONS TO COMPUTERS: $2k → 16%WGUC - CINCINNATI PUBLIC RADIO: $1k → 16%CRAYONS TO COMPUTERS: $2k → 16%CRAYONS TO COMPUTERS: $2k → 16%FREESTORE FOODBANK: $2k → 16%FREESTORE FOODBANK: $2k → 16%FREESTORE FOODBANK: $2k → 16%CRAYONS TO COMPUTERS: $2k → 16%FREESTORE FOODBANK: $2k → 16%CRAYONS TO COMPUTERS: $2k → 16%CRAYONS TO COMPUTERS: $2k → 16%CINTI LAB RETRIEVERS RESCUE: $2k → 16%CINTI LAB RETRIEVERS RESCUE: $2k → 16%CINTI LAB RETRIEVERS RESCUE: $2k → 16%CINTI LAB RETRIEVERS RESCUE: $2k → 16%CINTI LAB RETRIEVERS RESCUE: $2k → 16%WOMEN HELPING WOMEN: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$140k · 22 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +67% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
7

Total granted

$140k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
0%

Still filing today

36%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionArts & CulturePhilanthropyHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CRAYONS AND BEYOND INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $12k · revenue +152%
  • WH
    WOMEN HELPING WOMEN
    6× · 2020–2025 · $7k · revenue +210%
  • TG
    The Greater Cincinnati Television Educational Foundation
    6× · 2020–2025 · $7k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • SA
    SALAVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • NK
    NEEDIEST KODS OF ALL
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • WC
    WGUC - CINCINNATI PUBLIC RADIO
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cain Cincy

Tranforms lives inspiring hope by providing nutritious food,crisis assistance,resources and compassion that respects human dignity building a more vibrant community. feeding bodies and souls through its choice food pantry,weekly community…

Religion
2
West Ohio Food Bank

Everyone should have access to healthy, nutritious food. Together with our partners, we provide nutritious food to those in need. We do this through collaborating with more than 100 partner agencies, which include emergency pantries, soup…

Food & Nutrition
3
Last Mile Food Rescue

Last Mile is a Greater Cincinnati food rescue organization on a mission to save good food and get it to those who need it most. We empower local change-makers to make a critical difference in the lives of our neighbors fighting food…

Food & Nutrition
4
Cincinnati Public Radio Inc

Cincinnati Public Radio is the trusted, independent source of journalism, music and culture empowering a vibrant, engaged and informed community.

Arts & Culture
5
Legal Aid Society of Cincinnati

To resolve serious legal problems of low income people, to promote economic and family stability, and reduce poverty through effective legal assistance.

—
6
Cincinnati Recycling and Reuse Hub

To increase the landfill diversion, recycling, and reuse rates of the greater cincinnati area. we do this to help mitigate the effects of climate change, which disproportionately affects communities of color around the world. we find ways…

Environment
7
Cleveland Public Market Corporation

Cleveland public market corporations mission is to preserve the city's public market tradition while making the local food system more accessible, equitable, and diverse.

Community Improvement
8
World Affairs Council - Cincinnati & Northern Kentucky

The World Affairs Council, a 501(c)3 nonprofit, is the bridge that connects the world to one of America's most vibrant regions. Through Global education, International exchange, and cultural awareness initiatives, the council strengthens…

—
9
Your Store of the Queen City

Your Store of the Queen Citys mission empowers neighborhood-based entities to expand fresh food access & create community-based jobs by supporting the development & networking of resident- centered, culturally & economically inclusive…

Community Improvement
10
Cincinnati Works

Cincinnati works brings hope and encouragement to people living in poverty while assisting them in advancing to self-sufficiency through employment. we provide free training and coaching services.

Human Services
11
Ohio Justice and Policy Center

To create fair, intelligent, redemptive criminal justice systems through zealous client-centered advocacy, innovative policy reform and cross-sector community education.

Civil Rights
12
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Freestore Foodbank Inc; the most unlike its peers is La Soupe Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MIAMI PROJECT TO CURE PARALYSIS: $12,000 · OtherMIAMI PROJECT TO CURE PARALYSISCINTI LAB RETRIEVERS RESCUE: $11,000 · OtherCINTI LAB RETRIEVERS RESCUESALVATION ARMY: $10,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYWOMEN HELPING WOMEN: $7,000 · OtherWOMEN HELPING WOMENInter Parish Ministry Inc: $6,000 · OtherInter Parish Ministry IncCINCINNATI HABITIAT FOR HUMANITY: $6,000 · OtherCINCINNATI HABITIAT FOR HUMANITYSHELTERHOUSE GROUP: $6,000 · OtherSHELTERHOUSE GROUPTHE ABILITY CENTER: $6,000 · OtherTHE ABILITY CENTERWGUC - CINTI PUBLIC RADIO: $6,000 · OtherWGUC - CINTI PUBLIC RADIOST JOSEPH ORPHANAGE: $4,000 · Other+12 more: $22,000 · Other+12 moreFREESTORE FOODBANK INC: $12,000 · Food & NutritionFREESTORE FOO…LA SOUPE INC: $6,000 · Food & NutritionLA SOUPE INCCRAYONS AND BEYOND INC: $12,000 · PhilanthropyCRAYONS A…The Greater Cincinnati Television Educational Foundation: $7,000 · Arts & CultureCINCINNATI MUSEUM CENTER: $4,000 · Arts & CultureNEEDIEST KIDS OF ALL: $10,000 · Human ServicesJunior League of Cincinnati: $500 · Community Improvement
Other$96,000Food & Nutrition$18,000Philanthropy$12,000Arts & Culture$11,000Human Services$10,000Community Improvement$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFREESTORE FOODBANK INC: $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCRAYONS AND BEYOND INC: $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNEEDIEST KIDS OF ALL: $10,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetWOMEN HELPING WOMEN: $7,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetThe Greater Cincinnati Television Educational Foundation: $7,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetInter Parish Ministry Inc: $6,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLA SOUPE INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCINCINNATI MUSEUM CENTER: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJOSH CARES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetJunior League of Cincinnati: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FREESTORE FOODBANK INC ↗
  • Who funds CRAYONS AND BEYOND INC ↗
  • Who funds NEEDIEST KIDS OF ALL ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN HELPING WOMEN ↗
  • Who funds The Greater Cincinnati Television Educational Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Inter Parish Ministry Inc ↗
  • Who funds LA SOUPE INC ↗
  • Who funds CINCINNATI MUSEUM CENTER ↗
  • Who funds JOSH CARES INC ↗
  • Who funds Junior League of Cincinnati ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Cincinnati FoundationOH17.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Thomas J Emery Memorial · Charles H Dater Foundation Inc · Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Warren & Bernice Hensel Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Warren & Bernice Hensel Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Warren & Bernice Hensel’s filings →

    More from the funding graph