Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Van Grinsven Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$80k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$132kFood & Nutrition$52kHealth$50kHuman Services$47kCivil Rights$40kCrime & Legal$27kArts & Culture$15kHousing & Shelter$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $42k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$492k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INSTITUTE FOR NONVIOLENCE CHICAGO$12,000
GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY$10,000
NATIONAL IMMIGRANT JUSTICE CENTER$10,000
LURIE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$10,000
CHICAGO JESUIT ACADEMY$9,500
ARRUPE COLLEGE$5,000
DOMINICAN UNIVERSITY$5,000
HEARTS AND HOMES FOR REFUGEES$5,000
LEWY BODY DEMENTIA ASSOCIATION$5,000
ILLINOIS HOLOCAUST MUSEUM AND EDUCATION CENTER$5,000
JESUIT REFUGEE SERVICE USA$2,500
HOPE WORKS SOCIAL ENTERPRISES$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HEARTS AND HOMES FOR REFUGEES: $5k → 9%HEARTS AND HOMES FOR REFUGEES: $5k → 9%LIGHTHOUSE DC: $4k → 14%FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - CHICAGO: $5k → 14%HEARTS & HOMES FOR REFUGEES: $3k → 9%INSPIRATION CORPORATION: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
IA
IN
PA
CT
DC
HI
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$312k · 16 repeat orgs$87k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
20

Total granted

$312k
$69k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+23%

Still filing today

63%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionCrime & LegalEducationArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IF
    Institute for Nonviolence Chicago
    4× · 2022–2025 · $40k · revenue +91%
  • GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY
    3× · 2020–2025 · $37k · revenue +17%
  • FO
    FAMILIES OF SPINAL MUSCULAR ATROPHY DBA CURE SMA
    4× · 2017–2024 · $25k · revenue +93%

Funded once

  • SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -4%
  • IC
    Inspiration Corporationgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $8k · revenue +66%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nourishing Hope

Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.

2
Meals On Wheels Chicago

Our mission is to ensure that Chicago seniors and people with disabilities benefit from nutritious meal programs that improve their quality of life and maximize independence.

Food & Nutrition
3
Feeding Illinois

Feeding illinois is a coalition of eight feeding america food banks that provide food to over 2,400 food pantries, soup kitchens, and shelters that feed nearly 1.4 million residents across the entire state of illinois.

Food & Nutrition
4
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
5
House of the Good Shepherd

House of Good Shepherd serves with love and compassion women and children affected by domestic violence by offering a safe place with opportunities for emotional, educational and spiritual growth, giving hope and continued support for a…

Human Services
6
Kipp Chicago Schools

The team at kipp chicago schools is guided by a simple, yet powerful mission: to create a network of excellent schools in chicago that teach our students the character and academic skills necessary to succeed in college and beyond, and to…

Education
7
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Greater Washongton Dc Inc

Ronald mcdonald house charities of greater washington, dc (rmhcdc) provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

Health
8
Association House of Chicago

Association house's mission is to advance each person's full participation in the life of their families, communities, and society. since 1899, we have served a vibrant, multicultural community. we used a trauma informed, culturally…

Human Services
9
Chicago Coalition to End Homelessness

Chicago Coalition to End Homelessness (CCH) builds community power and advances racial equity through organizing, advocacy, legal assistance, and education to prevent and end homelessness because housing is a human right.

Housing & Shelter
10
New Hope Services Inc

Provide services in response to individual need

Human Services
11
Washington Dc Meals on Wheels Inc

We deliver healthy delicious meals to our home-bound neighbors. With a vision of creating a more interconnected resilient and compassionate community our program supports entire family systems. In 2024 236 volunteers delivered 55,642 meals…

12
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Shoulders Fund and the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr14%17%5–10yr18%22%10–20yr17%9%20–35yr15%39%35–55yr15%13%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%8%5–10yr18%20%10–20yr17%6%20–35yr15%41%35–55yr15%25%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/24
the rest of the field
15%
7,263/48,945

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
16/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHICAGO JESUIT ACADEMY — $66,597 · OtherCHICAGO JESUIT ACADEMYARRUPE COLLEGE — $22,500 · OtherARRUPE COLLEGEDANIEL MURPHY SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $20,570 · OtherDANIEL MURPHY SCHOLARSHIP FUNDNATIONAL IMMIGRANT JUSTICE CENTER — $15,000 · OtherNATIONAL IMMIGRANT JUSTICE CENTERANNE & ROBERT LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $11,500 · OtherANNE & ROBERT LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONLURIE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $10,000 · OtherHEARTS AND HOMES FOR REFUGEES — $10,000 · OtherMISERICORDIA — $7,500 · Other+13 more — $33,200 · Other+13 moreGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $36,800 · Food & NutritionGREATER CHICAG…CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC — $12,000 · Food & NutritionCAPITAL AREA F…MEALS ON WHEELS — $3,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEEL…Institute for Nonviolence Chicago — $39,500 · Crime & LegalInstitute for …SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Crime & LegalSANDY HOOK PRO…FAMILIES OF SPINAL MUSCULAR ATROPHY DBA CURE SMA — $25,000 · HealthFAMILIES OF …Lewy Body Dementia Association Inc — $10,000 · HealthLewy Body De…Ronald McDonald House Global — $4,000 · HealthRonald McDon…THE JACKSON CHANCE FOUNDATION — $3,600 · HealthTHE JACKSON …HEARTS AND HOMES FOR REFUGEES — $12,500 · Human ServicesHEARTS AN…Inspiration Corporation — $8,000 · Human ServicesInspirati…FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - CHICAGO — $5,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS O…Teambrownsville Inc — $4,000 · Human ServicesTeambrown…LIGHTHOUSE DC — $3,500 · Human ServicesLIGHTHOUS…+1 more — $1,000 · Human ServicesHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC — $15,000 · Arts & CultureDOMINICAN UNIVERSITY — $5,000 · EducationBig Shoulders Fund — $4,000 · Education
Other$196,867Food & Nutrition$51,800Crime & Legal$49,500Health$42,600Human Services$34,000Arts & Culture$15,000Education$9,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetInstitute for Nonviolence Chicago — $39,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $36,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILIES OF SPINAL MUSCULAR ATROPHY DBA CURE SMA — $25,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDANIEL MURPHY SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $20,570 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTS AND HOMES FOR REFUGEES — $12,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC — $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLewy Body Dementia Association Inc — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetInspiration Corporation — $8,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDOMINICAN UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - CHICAGO — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBig Shoulders Fund — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRonald McDonald House Global — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JACKSON CHANCE FOUNDATION — $3,600 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE DC — $3,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetHOPEWORKS SOCIAL ENTERPRISES — $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVocel Viewing our Children as Emerging Leaders — $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWALPOLE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC — $400 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY11.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Van Grinsven Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Van Grinsven Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Van Grinsven Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph