Skip to content
The United Way of Clark Champaign & Madison Counties Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

The United Way of Clark Champaign & Madison Counties Inc

Increase the organized capacity for people to care for one another.

$851k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$85k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.8MHuman Services$1.1MHousing & Shelter$1.1MFood & Nutrition$708kEducation$400kYouth Development$335kRecreation & Sports$143kPublic Safety & Disaster$113kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 26 grants below total $564,959, the rows itemized in this filing. The $850,635 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $285,676 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $382k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $144k
$16,250
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF$84,999
SPRINGFIELD CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT$59,185
WELLSPRING$44,653
PROJECT WOMAN OF OHIO$42,000
NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING PARTNERSHIP OF$31,500
DISTRICT COUNCIL OF SPRINGFIELD$29,500
CLARK COUNTY LITERACY COALITION$26,000
CARING KITCHEN INC$23,660
CAREERCONNECTED$20,000
LIFECARE ALLIANCE$20,000
CLARK COUNTY COMBINED HEALTH$18,671
PREGNANCY RESOURCE CLINIC OF$17,500
CLARK COUNTY DEPT OF REENTRY$16,250
MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION$15,000
URBANA CITY SCHOOLS$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $894k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: $8k → 10%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CLARK: $84k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHWESTERN: $63k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHWESTERN OHIO: $62k → 15%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CLARK: $60k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHWESTERN OHIO: $59k → 15%CHAMPAIGN FAMILY YMCA: $18k → 10%PROJECT WOMAN OF OHIO: $42k → 15%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CLARK: $35k → 15%AMERICAN RED CROSS NORTHERN MIAMI: $35k → 15%PROJECT WOMAN OF OHIO: $30k → 15%Champaign Family YMCA: $14k → 10%CHAMPAIGN FAMILY YMCA: $11k → 10%CHAMPAIGN FAMILY Y: $10k → 10%American Red Cross Northern Miami Valley: $23k → 15%CHAMPAIGN FAMILY Y: $10k → 10%CHAMPAIGN FAMILY YMCA: $10k → 10%PROJECT WOMAN OF OHIO: $17k → 15%CHAMPAIGN FAMILY YMCA: $6k → 10%CHAMPAIGN FAMILY Y: $5k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS NORTHERN MIAMI VALLEY: $15k → 15%THE URBANA CHAMPAIGN COUNTY SENIOR CITIZEN'S CENTER: $5k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS NORTHERN MIAMI: $13k → 15%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $11k → 15%AMERICAN RED CROSS NORTHERN MIAMI: $9k → 15%CITILOOKOUT: $5k → 15%MARRIAGE RESOURCE CENTER: $935 → 15%GRACEWORKS: $4k → 15%PROJECT WOMEN OF SPRINGFIELD AND CLARK COUNTY: $48k → 15%PROJECT WOMEN OF SPRINGFIELD AND CL: $43k → 15%Project Women of Springfield and Clark County: $32k → 15%PROJECT WOMEN OF SPRINGFIELD AND CL: $20k → 15%PROJECT WOMEN OF SPRINGFIELD AND CL: $11k → 15%PROJECT WOMEN OF SPRINGFIELD AND CL: $8k → 15%MIAMI VALLEY CHILD DEVELOPMENT: $8k → 15%DISTRICT COUNCIL OF SPRINGFIELD: $30k → 15%DISTRICT COUNCIL OF SPRINGFIELD: $17k → 15%FAMILY AND YOUTH INITIATIVES: $5k → 15%ST VINCENT DEPAUL: $8k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.1M · 39 repeat orgs$211k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

39 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
18

Total granted

$6.1M
$101k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+7%

Still filing today

72%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $110k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SI
    SHELTERED INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $808k · revenue +28%
  • W
    WELLSPRING
    9× · 2017–2025 · $707k · revenue +4%
  • RH
    ROCKING HORSE CHILDREN'S HEALTH CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $379k · revenue +105%

Funded once

  • FG
    FULL GOSPEL FELLOWSHIP OF CHURCHES AND MINISTERS INTL INC
    one grant, 2024 · $22k
  • VU
    VARIOUS ( UNDER 4000)
    one grant, 2023 · $12k
  • TB
    TCN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $9k · revenue +7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Springvale Health Centers Inc

Provide high quality integrated healthcare services to consumers and agencies primarily in tuscarawas and carroll counties.

Health
2
Springwell Inc

Springwell helps individuals improve their quality of life and reduce their need for residential care by helping them access community resources. springwell works with individuals directly as well as with government agencies, health…

Human Services
3
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
4
Clark Community Mental Health Center

Reduce the stigma and promote awareness surrounding mental health within the communities we serve, promote wellness, and provide individualized care with an integrated approach.

Health
5
Columbus Neighborhood Health Center Inc

To serve the central ohio community with affordable, easy to access healthcare services.

Health
6
Ohio Hills Health Services

Ohio hills health services is a non-profit health care operation, organized by communities in eastern ohio to promote healthy lifestyles and to provide preventative and comprehensive medical and dental care for area residents. the primary…

—
7
The Women's Clinic of Columbus

Women's health clinic focusing on helping at-risk parents deal with issues related to prenancy and parenting.

Health
8
Clermont Counseling Center

To ensure people with mental illness, addiction, and related challenges lead healthy and productive lives.

Health
9
Community Shelter Board

The community shelter board is ending homelessness by creating collaborations, innovating solutions, and investing in quality programs.

—
10
Southern Indiana Community Health Care Inc

To provide high-quality, comprehensive, community-sensitive health care utilizing christ-oriented principles. rooted in our faith-driven values, sichc serves as a pillar for accessible, comprehensive care of the whole person and a catalyst…

Health
11
Community Reach Center Inc

Community reach center's mission is to enhance the health of our community.

Health
12
Heartland Community Health Clinic D/B/a Heartland Health Services

Provide affordable, high-quality health services and remove inequities to improve the lives of all.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bridges Community Action Partnership; the most unlike its peers is Madison County Community Hospital. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
44/46
Grantees still filing
33/46
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHELTERED INC: $808,137 · OtherSHELTERED INCWELLSPRING: $706,744 · OtherWELLSPRINGVARIOUS ORGANIZATIONS UNDER 5000: $532,365 · OtherVARIOUS ORGANIZATIONS UNDER 5000Caring Kitchen Inc: $232,339 · OtherCaring Kitchen IncOESTERLEN - SERVICES FOR YOUTH FOUNDATION INC: $192,746 · OtherSpringfield City Schools: $139,585 · OtherCITY OF SPRINGFIELD OHIO: $139,536 · Other+28 more: $899,947 · Other+28 moreCatholic Charities Southwestern Ohio: $362,751 · Human ServicesCatholic Charit…PROJECT WOMAN OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY: $251,462 · Human ServicesPROJECT WOMAN O…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $105,726 · Human ServicesAmerican Nation…CHAMPAIGN FAMILY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN A: $84,768 · Human ServicesCHAMPAIGN FAMIL…DISTRICT COUNCIL OF SPRINGFIELD OHIO SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $54,500 · Human ServicesDISTRICT COUNCI…+7 more: $34,868 · Human ServicesROCKING HORSE CHILDREN'S HEALTH CENTER: $378,670 · HealthROCKING HORSE C…Community Mercy Health Partners: $240,190 · HealthCommunity Mercy…MCKINLEY HALL INC: $97,696 · HealthMCKINLEY HALL I…Cancer Association of Champaign County: $51,865 · HealthCancer Associat…THE LOVING CARE HOSPICE INC: $38,209 · HealthMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES FOR CLARK CO INC: $33,290 · Health+3 more: $28,219 · HealthOHIO TRI COUNTY FOOD ALLIANCE DBA SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $262,999 · Food & NutritionLIFECARE ALLIANCE: $200,619 · Food & NutritionCLARK COUNTY LITERACY COALITION: $155,045 · EducationASPIRE P16 COLLABORATIVE: $95,129 · Education+1 more: $5,245 · EducationON-THE-RISE: $84,323 · Youth DevelopmentGirl Scouts of Western Ohio: $43,915 · Youth Development+1 more: $684 · Youth DevelopmentNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING PARTNERSHIP OF GREATER SPRINGFIELD: $71,500 · Community Improvement
Other$3,651,399Human Services$894,075Health$868,139Food & Nutrition$463,618Education$255,419Youth Development$128,922Community Improvement$71,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHELTERED INC: $808,137 over 8y, 8.3% of budgetWELLSPRING: $706,744 over 9y, 12% of budgetROCKING HORSE CHILDREN'S HEALTH CENTER: $378,670 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetCatholic Charities Southwestern Ohio: $362,751 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetOHIO TRI COUNTY FOOD ALLIANCE DBA SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $262,999 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetPROJECT WOMAN OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY: $251,462 over 9y, 2.6% of budgetCommunity Mercy Health Partners: $240,190 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCaring Kitchen Inc: $232,339 over 9y, 11% of budgetLIFECARE ALLIANCE: $200,619 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetOESTERLEN - SERVICES FOR YOUTH FOUNDATION INC: $192,746 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetCLARK COUNTY LITERACY COALITION: $155,045 over 9y, 10.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $105,726 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMCKINLEY HALL INC: $97,696 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetASPIRE P16 COLLABORATIVE: $95,129 over 8y, 5.5% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SPRINGFIELD INC: $93,213 over 6y, 39% of budgetCHAMPAIGN FAMILY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN A: $84,768 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetON-THE-RISE: $84,323 over 8y, 6.4% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING PARTNERSHIP OF GREATER SPRINGFIELD: $71,500 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetELDERLY UNITED OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY OHIO INC: $69,524 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTECUMSEH COUNCIL 439 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $66,877 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetDISTRICT COUNCIL OF SPRINGFIELD OHIO SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $54,500 over 3y, 6.6% of budgetBRIDGES COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $54,030 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCancer Association of Champaign County: $51,865 over 4y, 18% of budgetGirl Scouts of Western Ohio: $43,915 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LOVING CARE HOSPICE INC: $38,209 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE NEHEMIAH FOUNDATION OF SPRINGFIELD/CLARK COUNTY: $35,383 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES FOR CLARK CO INC: $33,290 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SPRINGFIELD: $29,400 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCONSOLIDATED CARE INC: $29,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL OHIO INC: $25,924 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTCN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES INC: $8,719 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: $7,500 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetTAC INDUSTRIES INC: $6,637 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPRINGFIELD CATHOLIC CENTRAL SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $5,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFAMILY AND YOUTH INITIATIVES: $5,269 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCITILOOKOUT: $5,249 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNEW CARLISLE LIBRARY BOARD: $5,245 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetUrbana Champaign County Senior Citizens Center Inc: $4,693 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetGRACEWORKS LUTHERAN SERVICES: $3,722 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMADISON COUNTY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENCOMPASS CONNECTION CENTER: $935 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF OHIO'S HEARTLAND COUNCIL INC: $684 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHELTERED INC ↗
  • Who funds WELLSPRING ↗
  • Who funds ROCKING HORSE CHILDREN'S HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Catholic Charities Southwestern Ohio ↗
  • Who funds OHIO TRI COUNTY FOOD ALLIANCE DBA SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT WOMAN OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Community Mercy Health Partners ↗
  • Who funds Caring Kitchen Inc ↗
  • Who funds LIFECARE ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds OESTERLEN - SERVICES FOR YOUTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CLARK COUNTY LITERACY COALITION ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds MCKINLEY HALL INC ↗
  • Who funds ASPIRE P16 COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SPRINGFIELD INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAMPAIGN FAMILY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN A ↗
  • Who funds ON-THE-RISE ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING PARTNERSHIP OF GREATER SPRINGFIELD ↗
  • Who funds ELDERLY UNITED OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY OHIO INC ↗
  • Who funds TECUMSEH COUNCIL 439 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds DISTRICT COUNCIL OF SPRINGFIELD OHIO SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGES COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds Cancer Association of Champaign County ↗
  • Who funds Girl Scouts of Western Ohio ↗
  • Who funds THE LOVING CARE HOSPICE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NEHEMIAH FOUNDATION OF SPRINGFIELD/CLARK COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES FOR CLARK CO INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SPRINGFIELD ↗
  • Who funds CONSOLIDATED CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL OHIO INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Springfield Found…Community Hospital He…Della Selsor Tr UwHarry and Violet Turn…Dayton Foundation Dep…Wilson Sheehan Founda…Carleton F and Ruth T…Crabill Family Founda…Assurant FoundationWalter S Quinlan Foun…United Way of Logan C…Park National Corpora…
The Springfield FoundationOH61.2× affinity27 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Springfield Foundation · Community Hospital Health Services Foundation · Della Selsor Tr Uw · Harry and Violet Turner 95 Charitable Trust · Dayton Foundation Depository · Wilson Sheehan Foundation · Carleton F and Ruth T Davidson Trust · Crabill Family Foundation · Assurant Foundation · Walter S Quinlan Foundation · United Way of Logan County Inc · Park National Corporation Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The United Way of Clark Champaign & Madison Counties Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The United Way of Clark Champaign & Madison Counties Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    24report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Clark Champaign & Madison Counties’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home