Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Carleton F and Ruth T Davidson Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$328k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$611kRecreation & Sports$480kArts & Culture$333kHuman Services$255kCommunity Improvement$230kYouth Development$187kEducation$170kCrime & Legal$83kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $268k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$9.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION$50,000
SPRINGFIELD YOUTH MISSION$25,000
UNITED SENIOR SERVICES$25,000
THE WESTCOTT HOUSE$25,000
SPRINGFIELD PROMISE NEIGHBORHOOD$20,000
Individual grant recipient$18,000
THE NEHEMIAH FOUNDATION$15,000
SPRINGFIELD CITIZEN POLICE ACADEMY ALUMN$15,000
HARTMAN ROCK GARDEN$15,000
THE HERITAGE CENTER OF CLARK COUNTY$15,000
HOPE MINISTRIES$15,000
LIVING UNTETHERED MINISTRIES$10,000
CLARK COUNTY LITERACY COALITION$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
YMCA$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%ENCOMPASS CONNECTION CENTER: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.0M · 39 repeat orgs$759k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.

39 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 25 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
28

Total granted

$2.0M
$654k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+26%

Still filing today

36%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $105k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationReligionYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionAnimalsCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UL
    URBAN LIGHT MINISTRIES
    4× · 2021–2024 · $60k · revenue +1%
  • TN
    THE NEHEMIAH FOUNDATION OF SPRINGFIELD/CLARK COUNTY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $60k · revenue +97%
  • EU
    ELDERLY UNITED OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY OHIO INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $55k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • BL
    BRET LAYTON TOTAL MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2017 · $214k
  • CC
    CLARK CO CONVENTION FACILITIES
    one grant, 2023 · $75k
  • SC
    SOUTH CHARLESTON COMMUNITY PARK
    one grant, 2021 · $30k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Springfieldclark County Chamber of Commerce

Part iii, line 1 - to advance important economic development opportunities and issues, to help our members grow their businesses by delivering outstanding opportunities, to connect with each other and the broader community and to partner…

2
Inner City Mission of Springfield

The mission of inner city mission is to provide what is needed to help homeless children, their parents, and single women find their way home.

Religion
3
Springfield Center for Independent Livin

Provides independent living services and support to individuals with disabilities; trains and refers personal assistants

4
Springfield Area Collegiate Ministr

We believe in creating a space where students can have authentic encounters with christ, find life-long friends and get plugged in with a local church while they are in college.

Religion
5
Consumer Credit Counseling Service of Springfield

Improving economic security through financial education and coaching. Organization vision statement: Financial Freedom for All.

6
District Council of Springfield Ohio Society of St Vincent De Paul

To provide assistance to the poor and homeless in Springfield and Clark County Ohio

Human Services
7
Springfield Christian School

Springfield Christian School exists to provide a Christ centered environment in a non-denominational setting where children are valued (cherished) and nurtured to develop a desire to understand Gods will for their lives.

Education
8
Springfield Christian School

Our mission at springfield is to be a unique help to christian parents in the nurture and education of their children. our schedule allows parents to spend more time coming alongside their children and to tailor-fit their child's music,…

Education
9
The Springfield Project

The mission of the springfield project is to unite springfield as a community by working to improve the quality of life in our neighborhoods. the project seeks to empower citizens to develop solutions to problems that they identify in…

Community Improvement
10
Spring City Free Public Library

Public library

11
Springfield Jewish Community Center Inc

The springfield jcc enriches community and nurtures wellness through physical, intellectual, social and spiritual programs and services. the jcc is guided by jewish values, welcoming and respecting people of all abilities, ages,…

Recreation & Sports
12
Christ for Youth Charities Foundation Inc

Provide grants to charitable organizations to provide religious and social services to disadvantaged youth.

Youth Development

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Springfield City Youth Mission and the most unlike its peers is Aspire P16 Collaborative. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number16%4%<5yr8%4%5–10yr22%26%10–20yr13%30%20–35yr17%17%35–55yr23%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value16%3%<5yr8%4%5–10yr22%19%10–20yr13%22%20–35yr17%14%35–55yr23%39%55yr+

The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/24
the rest of the field
12%
87/726

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
15/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NATIONAL TRAIL PARKS AND RECREATION DISTRICT — $360,000 · OtherNATIONAL TRAIL PARKS AND RECREATION DISTRICTBRET LAYTON TOTAL MINISTRIES — $214,400 · OtherBRET LAYTON TOTAL MINISTRIESCOMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION — $120,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT CORPORATIONTHE SALVATION ARMY — $107,450 · OtherCLARK CO CONVENTION FACILITIES — $75,000 · OtherSPRINGFIELD YOUTH MISSION — $70,000 · Other+54 more — $1,111,500 · Other+54 moreSPRINGFIELD MUSEUM OF ART — $250,000 · Arts & CultureSPRINGFIEL…URBAN LIGHT MINISTRIES — $60,000 · ReligionTHE NEHEMIAH FOUNDATION OF SPRINGFIELD/CLARK COUNTY — $60,000 · ReligionBon Secours Mercy Health Foundation — $20,000 · ReligionCLARK STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $45,000 · EducationCLARK COUNTY LITERACY COALITION — $35,000 · EducationASPIRE P16 COLLABORATIVE — $20,000 · EducationROGER E BOOMERSHINE SKILL CENTER INC — $15,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION OF SPRINGFIELD-CLARK COUNTY — $70,000 · Community ImprovementON-THE-RISE — $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE — $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentSPRINGFIELD CITY YOUTH MISSION — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentJEFFERSON STREET OASIS COMMUNITY GARDEN — $35,000 · Food & NutritionSPRINGFIELD SOUP KITCHEN — $20,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$2,058,350Arts & Culture$250,000Religion$140,000Education$115,000Community Improvement$70,000Youth Development$70,000Food & Nutrition$55,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSPRINGFIELD MUSEUM OF ART — $250,000 over 3y, 8.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION OF SPRINGFIELD-CLARK COUNTY — $70,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetURBAN LIGHT MINISTRIES — $60,000 over 4y, 16% of budgetTHE NEHEMIAH FOUNDATION OF SPRINGFIELD/CLARK COUNTY — $60,000 over 5y, 5.0% of budgetELDERLY UNITED OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY OHIO INC — $55,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCLARK STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $45,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetON-THE-RISE — $40,000 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE — $37,500 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetJEFFERSON STREET OASIS COMMUNITY GARDEN — $35,000 over 3y, 28% of budgetCLARK COUNTY LITERACY COALITION — $35,000 over 4y, 5.6% of budgetOESTERLEN - SERVICES FOR YOUTH FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBon Secours Mercy Health Foundation — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASPIRE P16 COLLABORATIVE — $20,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPRINGFIELD SOUP KITCHEN — $20,000 over 2y, 7.7% of budgetROGER E BOOMERSHINE SKILL CENTER INC — $15,000 over 1y, 36% of budgetSPRINGFIELD CITY YOUTH MISSION — $10,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetENCOMPASS CONNECTION CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetCHILDRENS RESCUE CENTER INC — $10,000 over 1y, 9.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SPRINGFIELD MUSEUM OF ART
  • Who funds COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION OF SPRINGFIELD-CLARK COUNTY
  • Who funds URBAN LIGHT MINISTRIES
  • Who funds THE NEHEMIAH FOUNDATION OF SPRINGFIELD/CLARK COUNTY
  • Who funds ELDERLY UNITED OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY OHIO INC
  • Who funds CLARK STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ON-THE-RISE
  • Who funds SPRINGFIELD CITIZENS POLICE ACADEMY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE
  • Who funds JEFFERSON STREET OASIS COMMUNITY GARDEN
  • Who funds CLARK COUNTY LITERACY COALITION
  • Who funds OESTERLEN - SERVICES FOR YOUTH FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Bon Secours Mercy Health Foundation
  • Who funds ASPIRE P16 COLLABORATIVE
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Springfield FoundationOH32.5× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Springfield Foundation · Harry and Violet Turner 95 Charitable Trust · Della Selsor Tr Uw · Community Hospital Health Services Foundation · The United Way of Clark Champaign & Madison Counties Inc · Assurant Foundation · The Nehemiah Foundation of Springfield/Clark County · Shouvlin Foundation · Wilson Sheehan Foundation · Springfield Eagles Charity Inc · Synchrony Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Carleton F and Ruth T Davidson Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Carleton F and Ruth T Davidson Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Carleton F and Ruth T Davidson Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 74 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph