Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Ullmann Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$508k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$269k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Science & Tech$1.9MHealth$457kHuman Services$165kFood & Nutrition$128kEducation$107kPhilanthropy$105kCivil Rights$84kArts & Culture$67kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $64k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $125k
  • $250k+1 grant · $269k
$7,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE$269,000
AMERICAN TECHNION SOCIETY$125,000
KIND INC$17,500
DOROT$17,500
CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION$15,000
NORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT$8,750
KETAMINE RESEARCH FOUNDATION$8,000
NORTHWEST HARVEST$7,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SEATTLE$7,000
CITY HARVEST INC$5,250
PROJECT KESHER$4,500
ARTIS$3,500
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MUSEUM$3,500
NEW PLAZA CINEMA (MACAULAY HONORS COLLEGE)$3,500
ALEPH ALLIANCE FOR JEWISH RENEWAL$3,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $199k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 61% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SEATTLE: $7k → 9%LITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF SOMERSET COUNTY: $7k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SEATTLE: $5k → 9%LITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF SOMERSET COUNTY: $7k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SEATTLE: $5k → 9%LITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF SOMERSET COUNTY: $5k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SEATTLE: $5k → 9%LITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF SOMERSET COUNTY: $5k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SEATTLE: $5k → 9%LITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF SOMERSET COUNTY: $5k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SEATTLE: $5k → 9%LITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF SOMERSET COUNTY: $3k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SEATTLE: $5k → 9%LITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF SOMERSET COUNTY: $2k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SEATTLE: $4k → 9%LITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF SOMERSET COUNTY: $1k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SEATTLE: $4k → 9%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $8k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $8k → 17%DOROT: $18k → 17%DOROT: $18k → 17%DOROT: $14k → 17%DOROT: $10k → 17%DOROT: $10k → 17%DOROT: $10k → 17%DOROT: $10k → 17%DOROT: $8k → 17%DOROT: $8k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
WA
WI
NY
PA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
MD
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.1M · 29 repeat orgs$117k to everyone else

29 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
17

Total granted

$2.1M
$95k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+38%

Still filing today

83%
76%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureInternationalHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +17%
  • CF
    CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $155k · revenue +29%
  • DI
    DOROT INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $105k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • MH
    Montefiore Health System Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +42%
  • TJ
    THE JAM SESSION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $8k · revenue +38%
  • FRACTURED ATLAS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue +16%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
Fajr Scientific

To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.

Science & Tech
3
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
4
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
5
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
6
The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research

The feinstein institute for medical research ("the institute") is the research branch of northwell health ("northwell"). through its affiliation with northwell, the institute's mission is to bridge the gap between biomedical research and…

Health
7
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
8
Institute for Protein Innovation Inc

The institute for protein innovation is advancing protein science to accelerate research and improve human health.

Health
9
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
10
Society for Neuroscience

Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…

Health
11
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
12
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Henry Street Settlement and the most unlike its peers is Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community Organizati…Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…Environmental Conservation …Community Arts CentersDevelopmental Disabilities …Immigrant Worker SupportHealth Access Advocacy and …Elementary Literacy TutoringFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Food Banks and PantriesCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr14%5%5–10yr20%16%10–20yr19%30%20–35yr13%28%35–55yr16%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%3%10–20yr19%10%20–35yr13%11%35–55yr16%76%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/44
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,716

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
44/44
Grantees still filing
34/44
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC — $1,001,000 · InternationalAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INCAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC — $946,500 · InternationalAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC+4 more — $22,000 · InternationalALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE — $225,000 · OtherALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEG…NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM — $72,750 · OtherNORTHWEST HARVEST EMMMAPS — $65,000 · OtherMAPSNORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT — $39,000 · OtherNORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RI…KIND INC — $48,000 · OtherKIND INCREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES — $40,000 · OtherREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CE…+22 more — $152,678 · Other+22 moreCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $154,500 · HealthMontefiore Health System Inc — $20,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST HAWAII ALASKA INDIANA AND KENTUCKY — $10,500 · HealthFoundation for the National Institutes of Health Inc — $9,800 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $9,800 · HealthThe Ketamine Research Foundation — $8,000 · Health+4 more — $23,000 · HealthDOROT INC — $104,858 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE — $44,500 · Human ServicesLITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF SOMERSET COUNTY — $34,000 · Human ServicesHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT — $15,864 · Human ServicesJazz Foundation of America Inc — $69,000 · PhilanthropyTHE NEW YORK TIMES COMMUNITIES FUND — $31,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $2,500 · PhilanthropyTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $61,000 · EducationSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $5,000 · EducationCITY HARVEST INC — $55,250 · Food & Nutrition
International$1,969,500Other$642,428Health$235,600Human Services$199,222Philanthropy$102,500Education$66,000Food & Nutrition$55,250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC — $1,001,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC — $946,500 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $154,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDOROT INC — $104,858 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM — $72,750 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetJazz Foundation of America Inc — $69,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $61,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC — $55,250 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetKIND INC — $48,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE — $44,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT — $39,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetLITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF SOMERSET COUNTY — $34,000 over 8y, 4.0% of budgetTHE NEW YORK TIMES COMMUNITIES FUND — $31,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMontefiore Health System Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT — $15,864 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEDUCATION THROUGH MUSIC INC — $15,858 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMON FIRE FOUNDATION — $15,700 over 4y, 13% of budgetNaropa University — $12,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR WHOLE COMMUNITIES INC — $12,250 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetTHE AMERICAN VISIONARY ART MUSEUM INC — $12,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST HAWAII ALASKA INDIANA AND KENTUCKY — $10,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLEGACY INTERNATIONAL — $10,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFoundation for the National Institutes of Health Inc — $9,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $9,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALEPH Alliance for Jewish Renewal — $9,750 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE JAM SESSION INC — $8,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC — $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF NEW YORK CITY INC — $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUSONA INSTITUTE INC — $6,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST FOLKLIFE — $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEXT HARM REDUCTION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $4,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAINFOREST TRUST — $4,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetProject Kesher — $4,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ELLEN P HERMANSON FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNEW YORK ROAD RUNNERS INC — $2,420 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJust Vision Inc — $1,700 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNational Philanthropi…Morgan Stanley Global…Donor Advised Charita…Vanguard Charitable E…Fidelity Investments …American Online Givin…Amazonsmile Foundation
Jewish Communal FundNY10.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Ullmann Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The American Visionary Art Museum Inc — 6% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines