Skip to content
The Truman and Judy Doggett Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Truman and Judy Doggett Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$20k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$321kInternational$11kHealth$9kHuman Services$9kPublic Safety & Disaster$7kYouth Development$4kAnimals$3kFood & Nutrition$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $16k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$818k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHARITY BAPTIST MISSION$15,900
GUILFORD COUNTY FIRE & RESCUE$1,000
MASONIC HOME FOR CHILDREN AT OXFORD$1,000
SOUTH MOUNTAIN CHRISTIAN CAMP$1,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$500
Individual grant recipient$100
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF SUMMERFIELD$100
GUILFORD COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MASONIC HOME FOR CHILDREN: $1k → 11%MASONIC HOME FOR CHILDREN: $1k → 11%TRELLIS SUPPORTIVE CARE: $100 → 15%MASONIC HOME FOR CHILDREN: $1k → 11%MASONIC HOME FOR CHILDREN AT OXFORD: $650 → 11%HORSEPOWER THERAPEUTIC LEARNING CEN: $1k → 16%MASONIC HOME FOR CHILDREN AT OXFORD: $500 → 11%MASONIC HOME FOR CHILDREN AT OXFORD: $1k → 16%MASONIC HOME FOR CHILDREN AT OXFORD: $500 → 11%AUTHORACARE COLLECTIVE: $100 → 16%HORSEPOWER THERAPEUTIC LEARNING CEN: $1k → 16%HORSEPOWER THERAPEUTIC LEARNING CEN: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$361k · 14 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
21

Total granted

$361k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+28%

Still filing today

43%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $200 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionAnimalsHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE MASONIC HOME FOR CHILDREN AT OXFORD INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $6k · revenue +52%
  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
    5× · 2017–2022 · $5k · revenue +120%
  • HI
    HORSEPOWER INC
    3× · 2017–2020 · $3k · revenue +124%

Funded once

  • CC
    CHARITY CHILDREN'S HOME SOUTH INDIA
    one grant, 2023 · $780
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $750 · revenue +134%
  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY OF DAVIDSON COUNTY INC
    one grant, 2018 · $500 · revenue +9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kansas City Hospice Inc

To bring expert care, peace of mind, comfort, guidance and hope to people who are affected by serious illness or by grief.

Human Services
2
Hospice of Gaston County Inc

To provide compassionate, exceptional and highly reliable care.

—
3
Hospice of Southern Kentucky Inc

The hospice mission is to honor life through exceptional service and compassionate care. the organization is primarily engaged in providing care and support that enables the terminally ill to spend their final days in a comfortable and…

—
4
Hospice of Wake County Inc

To care for individuals and families with compassion, support, and expertise as they navigate the end of life or life-changing illness.

—
5
Mirasol Health Inc

Mirasol health is a nonprofit, community-focused healthcare organization dedicated to honoring life through compassionate care and support for individuals facing chronic conditions, end-of-life, or grief. proudly serving beaufort, jasper,…

—
6
Hospice of Crawford County Inc

To provide quality health and human services in response to identified needs in our service area and to provide for the basic health and human service needs of all persons, regardless of ability to pay.

—
7
Our Hospice of South Central Indiana Inc

Our hospice of south central indiana, inc. (ohsci) is an independent, not-for-profit organization providing services to the terminally ill in a 22-county service area. since its inception 44 years ago, hospice has expanded to meet the…

Human Services
8
Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters

Dedicated to the mission of providing the best possible care and services for all children who come to us because of sickness and injury.

Health
9
Hopehealth Hospice & Palliative Care

Provide services to terminally ill patients and their families, as well as those experiencing serious illness and loss.

Human Services
10
East Tennessee Children's Hospital Association Inc

East tennessee children's hospital is a free-standing, independent, not-for-profit pediatric health care system which serves the east tennessee region. children's hospital is certified by the state of tennessee as a comprehensive regional…

Health
11
Humc Medical Observation Pa

To serve as the physician services component of a tax-exempt healthcare delivery network and to thereby promote, support & further the charitable purposes, programs & services of hmh hospitals corp.

—
12
The Community Hospice Inc

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. the community hospice is a member of st. peter's health partners…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice & Palliative Carecenter; the most unlike its peers is Alpha International Ministries Inc Dba Advancing International Missions. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF SUMMERFIELD: $212,600 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF SUMMERFIELDCHARITY BAPTIST MISSION INC: $107,540 · OtherCHARITY BAPTIST MISSION INC+24 more: $18,380 · Other+24 moreALPHA INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES INC DBA ADVANCING INTERNATIONAL MISSIONS: $10,500 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $750 · ReligionTHE MASONIC HOME FOR CHILDREN AT OXFORD INC: $5,650 · Human ServicesHORSEPOWER INC: $3,100 · Human Services+3 more: $300 · Human ServicesSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $5,100 · HealthHUMANE SOCIETY OF DAVIE COUNTY: $1,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF DAVIDSON COUNTY INC: $500 · AnimalsTHE WAR MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $100 · Arts & Culture
Other$338,520Religion$11,250Human Services$9,050Health$5,100Animals$1,500Arts & Culture$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALPHA INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES INC DBA ADVANCING INTERNATIONAL MISSIONS: $10,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE MASONIC HOME FOR CHILDREN AT OXFORD INC: $5,650 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $5,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH MOUNTAINS CHRISTIAN CAMP INC: $3,600 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHORSEPOWER INC: $3,100 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF DAVIE COUNTY: $1,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARECENTER: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUTHORACARE COLLECTIVE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WAR MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOSPICE OF THE PIEDMONT INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALPHA INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES INC DBA ADVANCING INTERNATIONAL MISSIONS ↗
  • Who funds THE MASONIC HOME FOR CHILDREN AT OXFORD INC ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH MOUNTAINS CHRISTIAN CAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds HORSEPOWER INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF DAVIE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF DAVIDSON COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARECENTER ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds AUTHORACARE COLLECTIVE ↗
  • Who funds THE WAR MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF THE PIEDMONT INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Louis DeJoy & Aldona …Reynolds American Fou…Duke Energy FoundationThe Blackbaud Giving …American Endowment Fo…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Louis DeJoy & Aldona Z Wos Family Foundation IncNC15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Louis DeJoy & Aldona Z Wos Family Foundation Inc · Reynolds American Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Truman and Judy Doggett Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Truman and Judy Doggett Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Truman and Judy Doggett Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home