Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Touma Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$21k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$38kHealth$14kHuman Services$13kScience & Tech$13kYouth Development$12kInternational$5kArts & Culture$4kReligion$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$136k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$10,000
JAMHOUR ALUMNI US$5,000
ASSOCIATION LES ENFANTS DE NOTRE DAME DE LA COMPASSION$3,500
FRIENDS OF ECOLE POLYTECHNIQUE$2,500
FINE ARTS MUSEUMS$229
ATHERTON POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION$100
ARS URBIS - 405 SHRADER$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 86% of grant dollars ($156k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 14% that went abroad ($25k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MIRACLE MESSAGES: $100 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
NJ
RI
CA
VA
MD
NC
GA

Beyond the US: 14% of all-years giving ($25k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
France$25k · 9 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of The Touma Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Touma Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 14% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$149k · 13 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
21

Total granted

$149k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-17%
+56%

Still filing today

46%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $200 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHealthCrime & LegalCivil RightsScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    6× · 2020–2025 · $65k
  • JA
    JAMHOUR ALUMNI US INCORPORATED
    5× · 2021–2025 · $25k · revenue -30%
  • PI
    PARTNERS IN HEALTH
    5× · 2017–2021 · $13k

Funded once

  • PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +20%
  • MO
    MUNICIPALITY OF PRINCETON
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
Jewelers of America Inc

Jewelers of america, the most trusted and influential voice of the jewelry industry, empowers and unites its members through expert guidance and advocacy, driving excellence, integrity, and success in an ever-changing marketplace.

—
4
Association of American Medical Colleges

Aamc leads & serves the academic medicine community to improve the health of people everywhere.

Education
5
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
7
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
9
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
11
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
12
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family and Community Services East Bay; the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $65,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPARTNERS IN HEALTH: $13,000 · OtherPARTNERS IN HEALTHASSOCIATION LES ENFANTS DE NOTRE DAME DE LA COMPASSION: $12,500 · OtherASSOCIATION LES ENFANTS DE NOTRE DAME DE LA COMPASSIONASSOCIATION LES ENFANTS DE NOTRE DAME: $12,000 · OtherASSOCIATION LES ENFANTS DE NOTRE DAMEMUNICIPALITY OF PRINCETON: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · Other+17 more: $13,331 · Other+17 moreJAMHOUR ALUMNI US INCORPORATED: $25,000 · EducationJAMHOUR ALUMNI US…DUKE UNIVERSITY: $2,500 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITY+1 more: $120 · EducationBROWN UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · Community ImprovementFRIENDS OF ECOLE POLYTECHNIQUE INC: $8,500 · Science & TechPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $5,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $500 · Health+1 more: $100 · HealthKQED INC: $1,150 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $760 · Arts & CultureCORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS: $398 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $50 · Arts & CultureARAB FILM AND MEDIA INSTITUTE: $521 · Civil RightsVOTEAMERICA: $250 · Civil Rights
Other$125,831Education$27,620Community Improvement$10,000Science & Tech$8,500Health$5,600Arts & Culture$2,358Civil Rights$771

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJAMHOUR ALUMNI US INCORPORATED: $25,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF ECOLE POLYTECHNIQUE INC: $8,500 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC: $1,150 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $760 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetARAB FILM AND MEDIA INSTITUTE: $521 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF GREATER ROCHESTER: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS: $398 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVOTEAMERICA: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL VOTER PROJECT INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL JUSTICE COLLABORATIVE: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY ARTS & LECTURES INC: $120 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES EAST BAY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO JAZZ ORGANIZATION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JAMHOUR ALUMNI US INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF ECOLE POLYTECHNIQUE INC ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds KQED INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART ↗
  • Who funds ARAB FILM AND MEDIA INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds SUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF GREATER ROCHESTER ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds CORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS ↗
  • Who funds VOTEAMERICA ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL VOTER PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL JUSTICE COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds CITY ARTS & LECTURES INC ↗
  • Who funds Atherton Police Officers Assn ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES EAST BAY ↗
  • Who funds MIRACLE MESSAGES ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO JAZZ ORGANIZATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tides FoundationCA15.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tides Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Touma Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Touma Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Touma Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph