Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Touma Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$21k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0183% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$38kHealth$14kHuman Services$13kScience & Tech$13kYouth Development$12kInternational$5kArts & Culture$4kReligion$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$136k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$10,000
JAMHOUR ALUMNI US$5,000
ASSOCIATION LES ENFANTS DE NOTRE DAME DE LA COMPASSION$3,500
FRIENDS OF ECOLE POLYTECHNIQUE$2,500
FINE ARTS MUSEUMS$229
ATHERTON POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION$100
ARS URBIS - 405 SHRADER$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

Your US giving86% of grant dollars ($156k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 14% that went abroad ($25k) is mapped below.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MIRACLE MESSAGES: $100 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
NJ
RI
CA
VA
MD
NC
GA

Beyond the US14% of all-years giving ($25k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
France$25k · 9 grants

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 7% of The Touma Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Touma Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 14% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$149k · 13 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
21

Total granted

$149k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-17%
+56%

Still filing today

46%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $200 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHealthCrime & LegalCivil RightsScience & TechOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    6× · 2020–2025 · $65k
  • JA
    JAMHOUR ALUMNI US INCORPORATED
    5× · 2021–2025 · $25k · revenue -30%
  • PI
    PARTNERS IN HEALTH
    5× · 2017–2021 · $13k

Funded once

  • PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +20%
  • MO
    MUNICIPALITY OF PRINCETON
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

3
Jewelers of America Inc

Jewelers of america, the most trusted and influential voice of the jewelry industry, empowers and unites its members through expert guidance and advocacy, driving excellence, integrity, and success in an ever-changing marketplace.

4
Association of American Medical Colleges

Aamc leads & serves the academic medicine community to improve the health of people everywhere.

Education
5
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
7
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
9
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
11
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
12
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family and Community Services East Bay and the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $65,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPARTNERS IN HEALTH — $13,000 · OtherPARTNERS IN HEALTHASSOCIATION LES ENFANTS DE NOTRE DAME DE LA COMPASSION — $12,500 · OtherASSOCIATION LES ENFANTS DE NOTRE DAME DE LA COMPASSIONASSOCIATION LES ENFANTS DE NOTRE DAME — $12,000 · OtherASSOCIATION LES ENFANTS DE NOTRE DAMEMUNICIPALITY OF PRINCETON — $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $5,000 · Other+17 more — $13,331 · Other+17 moreJAMHOUR ALUMNI US INCORPORATED — $25,000 · EducationJAMHOUR ALUMNI US…DUKE UNIVERSITY — $2,500 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITY+1 more — $120 · EducationBROWN UNIVERSITY — $10,000 · Community ImprovementFRIENDS OF ECOLE POLYTECHNIQUE INC — $8,500 · Science & TechPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $5,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $500 · Health+1 more — $100 · HealthKQED INC — $1,150 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART — $760 · Arts & CultureCORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS — $398 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $50 · Arts & CultureARAB FILM AND MEDIA INSTITUTE — $521 · Civil RightsVOTEAMERICA — $250 · Civil Rights
Other$125,831Education$27,620Community Improvement$10,000Science & Tech$8,500Health$5,600Arts & Culture$2,358Civil Rights$771

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJAMHOUR ALUMNI US INCORPORATED — $25,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF ECOLE POLYTECHNIQUE INC — $8,500 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC — $1,150 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART — $760 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetARAB FILM AND MEDIA INSTITUTE — $521 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF GREATER ROCHESTER — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS — $398 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVOTEAMERICA — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL VOTER PROJECT INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL JUSTICE COLLABORATIVE — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY ARTS & LECTURES INC — $120 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES EAST BAY — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO JAZZ ORGANIZATION — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JAMHOUR ALUMNI US INCORPORATED
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF ECOLE POLYTECHNIQUE INC
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds KQED INC
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART
  • Who funds ARAB FILM AND MEDIA INSTITUTE
  • Who funds SUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF GREATER ROCHESTER
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds CORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS
  • Who funds VOTEAMERICA
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL VOTER PROJECT INC
  • Who funds SOCIAL JUSTICE COLLABORATIVE
  • Who funds CITY ARTS & LECTURES INC
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES EAST BAY
  • Who funds MIRACLE MESSAGES
  • Who funds Atherton Police Officers Assn
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO JAZZ ORGANIZATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tides FoundationCA15.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tides Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Touma Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph