· Private foundation
The Tkbw Private Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k69 grants · $299k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SAMARITAN'S PURSE | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| MONCLOVA CHRISTIAN ACADEMY | $5,500 |
| ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION | $5,000 |
| THE LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE | $5,000 |
| ST JUDES HOSPITAL | $5,000 |
| BUCKEYE INSTITUTE | $5,000 |
| MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER | $5,000 |
| HILLSDALE COLLEGE | $5,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY MAUMEE VALLEY | $5,000 |
| TOLEDO AREA HUMANE SOCIETY | $5,000 |
| ASHBROOK CENTER | $5,000 |
| THE DAUGHTER PROJECT | $5,000 |
| HUMANE OHIO | $5,000 |
| OPERATION BLESSING INTERNATIONAL | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $84k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against -17% for the ones you funded once.
79 repeat relationships — 67 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MVMAUMEE VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY5× · 2020–2024 · $35k · revenue +133%
- SPSAMARITAN'S PURSE5× · 2020–2024 · $33k · revenue +106%
- PRPROGERIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC5× · 2020–2024 · $30k · revenue +65%
Funded once
- RTRATTLE THE STARSBELLA VITAone grant, 2023 · $10k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $5k
- MRMONCLOVA ROAD BAPTIST CHURCH AND ACADEMYone grant, 2023 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To advance economic and social liberties and a free enterprise society through strategic litigation, training, communication, activism and research. in addition, the center will train law students, lawyers and policy activists in the…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Iri advances freedom and democracy worldwide by developing political parties, civic institutions, open elections, democratic governance and the rule of law.
Provide post-secondary education of excellence.
The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…
The foundation works to defend and promote the constitution of the united states, focusing especially on the first, fourth, fifth, sixth, eighth, and 14th amendments. the foundation also works to defend and promote the constitution of the…
To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.
A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.
Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.
Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.
See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…
Pro publica is an independent, non-profit, pulitzer prize-winning newsroom that produces investigative journalism in the public interest. our work focuses exclusively on truly important stories. [see continuation on schedule o] we produce…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Nightingales Harvest. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
61 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 61 of the 93 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MAUMEE VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds PROGERIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE VICTORY CENTER ↗
- Who funds TOLEDO HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ASHLAND UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds The Buckeye Institute ↗
- Who funds MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER ↗
- Who funds The Daughter Project ↗
- Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Operation Blessing International Relief and Development Corporation ↗
- Who funds HEARTBEAT OF TOLEDO INC ↗
- Who funds THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES ↗
- Who funds STATE POLICY NETWORK ↗
- Who funds MACKINAC CENTER ↗
- Who funds Young America's Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE INTREPID FALLEN HEROES FUND ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL RESEARCH CENTER ↗
- Who funds CHERRY STREET MISSION MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds TOLEDO SEAGATE FOODBANK INC ↗
- Who funds Leadership Institute ↗
- Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NIGHTINGALES HARVEST ↗
- Who funds MOVING PICTURE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Manahan ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Toledo Community Foundation Inc · The O-I Charities Foundation · The LaValley Foundation · Andersons Foundation · United Way of Greater Toledo · John Henry Eldred Jr Foundation · Edward Lamb Foundation Inc · The Mark S Feldstein and Sandra a Feldstein · Robert C and Susan M Savage Family Foundation · Tr Ua Toledo Community Foundation- Donor · The Andersons Fund Supporting Organization · Roach Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Tkbw Private Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.