· Private foundation
Roach Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FAMILY AND CHILD PREVENTION CTR | $30,000 |
| CITY MISSION OF FINDLAY | $30,000 |
| SOUL PATH OHIO INC | $25,000 |
| TRUSTEES OF UNIVERSITY PENNSYLVANIA | $20,000 |
| OVERLAND MISSION | $20,000 |
| ART AS HEALING FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| PAMILCO CO DISASTER RECOVERY | $15,000 |
| IMAGINATION STATION | $15,000 |
| CHILDREN HUNGER ALLIANCE | $10,000 |
| SEW HOPE | $10,000 |
| WOLAKOTA YOUTH PROGRAMS | $10,000 |
| PHOENIX PROJECT | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| THE OHANA PROJECT | $10,000 |
| ABOVE AND BEYOND CARE | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.
38 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 32 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $210k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RERiverbend Equine Therapy2× · 2023–2024 · $80k · revenue +23%
- FHFINDLAY HOPE HOUSE FOR THE HOMELESS INC3× · 2018–2022 · $57k · revenue +29%
- TNTransform Network Inc4× · 2017–2022 · $49k · revenue +459% · 26% of their budget
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2024 · $20k
- SPSafe Place Internationalone grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -3%
- NENOMADIC EARTH ARCHITECTUREone grant, 2024 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
It is our mission to demonstrate the love and compassion of jesus christ by protecting and enhancing the safety and well-being of persons from all backgrounds and across the continuum of life through the effective integration of the…
To provide recovering addicts with resources, training, support and temporary housing as they transition into independent and sober living. we seek to empower clients to achieve independence, financial stability, and integrate successfully…
To empower survivors to heal and engage all individuals and communities to address and prevent sexual assault and intimate partner violence
To educate, empower, enact dedicated to the healing and prevention of sexual violence in southeast ohio.
Our mission is to serve survivors of human trafficking and commercial sexual exploitation with a trauma-informed approach fueled by the love of Christ.
Haven's mission is to prevent sexual assault, domestic violence and stalking and to support and empower women, men, non-binary and transgender adults, youth, and families to heal from abuse and rebuild their lives.
New hope of indiana, inc. is a leader in providing holistic services and resources to persons with disabilities and their families while advocating to advance the opportunities for those in need of support.
To assist people with disabilities to live, work and socialize within a fully accessible community.
To empower people with developmental disabilities to experience the fullest life possible by providing person-centered supports which enable them to integrate into a variety of settings within their community
To create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home health care…
To empower persons with diabilities to lead inclusive lives through advocacy, community and self directed services.
Empowering people with disabilities to live independent lives in the community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The City Mission of Findlay Ohio and the most unlike its peers is Nuestra Gente Community Projects Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 19. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 114 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Riverbend Equine Therapy ↗
- Who funds FINDLAY HOPE HOUSE FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
- Who funds Transform Network Inc ↗
- Who funds OVERLAND MISSIONS INC ↗
- Who funds Queens University of Charlotte ↗
- Who funds NATURES NURSERY CENTER FOR WILDLIFE REHAB & CONSR ↗
- Who funds SCATTER JOY INC ↗
- Who funds THE VICTORY CENTER ↗
- Who funds IGNITE LEADERS INC ↗
- Who funds THE CITY MISSION OF FINDLAY OHIO ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HUNGER ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds SHAW FESTIVAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GREAT AND SMALL ↗
- Who funds TOLEDO SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
- Who funds SARA'S GARDEN ↗
- Who funds LUCAS COUNTY PIT CREW ↗
- Who funds Safe Place International ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS IN EDUCATION OF TOLEDO ↗
- Who funds Patriot Art Foundation ↗
- Who funds MOM'S HOUSE INC OF TOLEDO ↗
- Who funds DENVER POLICE ACTIVITIES LEAGUE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Toledo Community Foundation Inc · John Henry Eldred Jr Foundation · Toledo Classic Inc · The O-I Charities Foundation · The Stranahan Supporting Organization · Bon Secours Mercy Health Foundation · Toledo Community Foundation Inc Seneca Fund · The Andersons Fund Supporting Organization · Andersons Foundation · United Way of Greater Toledo · The Tkbw Private Foundation · The Oswald Supporting Organization
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Roach Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Roach Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Roach Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.