· Private foundation
The Titus Foundation Inc
Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2019.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2019
- Under $10k10 grants · $46k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
- $250k+2 grants · $2.6M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION | $2,228,035 |
| NATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION | $340,000 |
| NYACK COLLEGE | $25,000 |
| DEERFOOT LODGE | $15,000 |
| KISOBOKA UGANDA | $10,000 |
| MISSIONS DOOR | $7,000 |
| GOSPEL VOLUNTEERS INC | $5,000 |
| HOPELINE WOMEN'S CENTER INC | $5,000 |
| CHRISTIAN CAMPS AND CONFERENCES INC | $5,000 |
| PILGRIM PINES CONFERENCE CENTER | $5,000 |
| PINE BUSH BIBLE CAMP | $5,000 |
| CAMP HOPE | $5,000 |
| THE WORSHIP CENTER | $4,000 |
| SHALOM RESTORATION MINISTRIES | $4,000 |
| KIDS WITH A PROMISE | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
25 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2019, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2019, 4% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.6M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ALAMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS INC2× · 2017–2018 · $22k · revenue +22%
- CCCHRISTIAN CAMPS & CONFERENCE INC3× · 2017–2019 · $20k · revenue +37%
- AOASSOCIATION OF CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INT'L2× · 2017–2018 · $16k · revenue +4%
Funded once
- EPECOLOGY PROJECT INTERNATIONALone grant, 2018 · $6k · revenue -2%
- GIGREENHOUSE IN PARISone grant, 2017 · $3k
- CCRUone grant, 2018 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Reconciliaton Ministries Intl. is a Christian evangelical organization preaching and teaching the Word of God in over 60 countries. The ministry equips and encourages Christians everywhere to be saved, healed, and delivered according to…
ChinsSource is a trusted partner and platform for educating the global church on critical issues facing the church and ministries in China and for connecting Christians inside and outside China to advance the kingdom of God globally
North America Bible Institute (NABI) is an evangelical graduate school, made up of students who are diverse in both ethnicity and ministry aims -- but united in great love for Jesus and his gospel. As a graduate school, NABI offers them…
Lakelight Institute equips Christians with timeless wisdom for modern life.
Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.
Charis Bible Colleges, Inc. (CBC) was established to train and equip individuals to carry out the Gospel of Jesus Christ through practical application through mentoring, training, and teaching.
Religious corp, charitable, educational and cultural, conduct all activities relate to publishingchristian literature
The mission statement of the Christian Research Institute is to provide Christians worldwide with carefully researched information and well-reasoned answers that encourage them in their faith and equip them to intelligently represent it to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life and the most unlike its peers is Hopeline Women's Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds KISOBOKA UGANDA ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS INC ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN CAMPS & CONFERENCE INC ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION OF CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INT'L ↗
- Who funds HOPELINE WOMEN'S CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds GOSPEL VOLUNTEERS INC ↗
- Who funds Luis Palau Association ↗
- Who funds ACTS ONE EIGHT INC ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN HERITAGE SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds Shalom Restoration Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds ECOLOGY PROJECT INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds RIVENDELL INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds ADELBROOK INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Titus Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Adelbrook Inc — 9% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.