Skip to content

Massachusetts · Nonprofit

KISOBOKA UGANDA

KISOBOKA UGANDA (Massachusetts) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $473,873 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($410,580). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 92% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$397k
Funders on record
6
Grants received
$474k
Net assets
$70k
4/6 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 26%
01What it does

What Kisoboka Uganda does

Mission

For the people of Uganda: assistance for education, training, & small business initiatives; meals & healthcare; potable water. In cooperation with Kisoboka Initiative for Progress Ltd. in Uganda.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. The entirety of the organization's program service accomplishment is achieved in Uganda. Grants to Kisoboka Initiative for Progress, Ltd. (KIP) are made monthly, twelve times per year. KIP is a charitable entity limited by guarantee, based in Uganda. Kisoboka means "it is possible" in Lugandan. Monthly allocations to KIP provide for tuition, meals, and medical care. In addition, select monthly allocations include special items: school supplies and uniforms, school facilities, medical facilities, clean water facilities, hens and goats, and small business grants. The organization is KIP's primary source of funding. KIP provides regular reports to the organization on the status of initiatives. KIP operates the Kisoboka Junior Primary School, Kisoboka High School, and the Kisoboka Medical Center (located in the Wakiso district west of Kampala, Uganda). KIP also provides support for Christ the King High School and Shalom Restoration Academy in greater Kampala. By the numbers, KIP provides over 500 meals per school day, enrolls over 600 primary school students, over 200 high school students, and provides tuition assistance for 13 post-secondary students.

    $320,099 spent$397,024 earned by the program
    100% of program spending
  2. Other program services, not described on the e-filed return.

    $0 spent
    0% of program spending

The 2 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $320,099.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2021, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2021, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20212021 Revenue 100 ($455k) Expenses 100 ($336k) Net assets 100 ($123k)2022 Revenue 66 ($299k) Expenses 95 ($320k) Net assets 83 ($102k)2023 Revenue 61 ($278k) Expenses 97 ($325k) Net assets 45 ($55k)2024 Revenue 61 ($277k) Expenses 83 ($279k) Net assets 43 ($53k)2025 Revenue 87 ($397k) Expenses 113 ($380k) Net assets 57 ($70k)
20212022202320242025
Revenue (87)Expenses (113)Net assets (57)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $102k to $55k (−46%).

$123k
$102k
$55k
$53k
$70k
20212022202320242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of KISOBOKA UGANDA’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (91% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 23,870 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 5 reported years ran a deficit.

$119k
’21
−$21k
’22
−$47k
’23
−$2k
’24
$17k
’25
2.2
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Sandra W Ruggiero

Chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

20212022202320242025
Listed44333
Joined·+0+0+1+1
No longer listed·0111
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 3 funders, grant income rose $27k → $61k.

5 of 6 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 92% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of KISOBOKA UGANDA’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

KISOBOKA UGANDA leans on a few funders — its largest provides 87% of grant income and the top three 98%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

92% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund KISOBOKA UGANDA.

87%
largest funder
98%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 75% · 2018 100% · 2019 61% · 2020 100% · 2021 96% · 2022 100% · 2023 90% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

92% of KISOBOKA UGANDA's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $40k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from funders outside Massachusetts, across 1 state.

CT

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
Massachusetts out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $434k arriving through sponsors registered in 5 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

KISOBOKA UGANDA runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 13,062 human services nonprofits its size.

Operating margin4% · above the median
Months of reserve2.2mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−3% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 13,062 human services nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like KISOBOKA UGANDA

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Massachusetts

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

84% of spending goes to programs.

Program 84%Management 16%Fundraising 0%

Governance

5
board members
80%
independent
–Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

MA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for KISOBOKA UGANDA: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds KISOBOKA UGANDA?
KISOBOKA UGANDA (Massachusetts) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $473,873 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($410,580). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 92% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does KISOBOKA UGANDA have?
IRS filings report 6 organizations giving $473,873 in grants to KISOBOKA UGANDA, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of KISOBOKA UGANDA?
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND is the largest funder on record, with $410,580 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like KISOBOKA UGANDA find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Massachusetts. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Kisoboka Uganda →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2021–2025), and the filings of 6 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing