Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Tim Salmon Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$45k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$84kHealth$45kCrime & Legal$35kHousing & Shelter$30kEducation$17kRecreation & Sports$13kHuman Services$10kPhilanthropy$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $22k
$7,977
Median grant
4
States reached
$93k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Restore Ministries$12,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
African Bible College$7,977
Phoenix Seminary$5,000
Hope Harbor$5,000
Scottsdale Bible Church$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 78% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ST TERESA COUNCIL: $500 → 11%CONCEPT 7: $10k → 10%NEIL PITTS FOUNDATION: $1k → 13%RESTORE MINISTRIES: $10k → 11%Restore Ministries: $12k → 16%FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $10k → 15%JOSHIAH VENTURE: $5k → 7%African Bible College: $8k → 23%CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $25k → 8%FIRST SOUTHERN BAPTIST CHURCH: $1k → 11%LAUREL HOUSE: $5k → 10%FCA: $7k → 15%CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%ARIZONA URBAN YOUTH MINISTRIES: $2k → 11%CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION CENTER: $25k → 10%FCA: $3k → 15%CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%AZ FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $3k → 11%ANAHEIM COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%GRAND CANYON UNIVERSITY: $5k → 11%SCOTTSDALE BIBLE CHURCH: $10k → 11%FAMILY MATTERS: $6k → 11%FAMILY MATTERS: $6k → 11%FAMILY MATTERS: $6k → 11%Scottsdale Bible Church: $5k → 11%PHOENIX SEMINARY: $5k → 11%SCOTTSDALE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $6k → 11%Phoenix Seminary: $5k → 11%SCOTTSDALE CHRISTIAN ACAD: $5k → 11%SCOTTSDALE BIBLE CHURCH: $5k → 11%SCOTTSDALE CHRISTIAN ACAD: $1k → 11%FAMILY MATTERS: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
CA
MO
MD
AZ
MS
AL
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 7% of The Tim Salmon Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Tim Salmon Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$140k · 7 repeat orgs$107k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against -29% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
11

Total granted

$140k
$72k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
-29%

Still filing today

71%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 22% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationYouth DevelopmentReligionHealthPhilanthropyCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION
    3× · 2018–2022 · $40k · revenue +29%
  • LH
    Laurel House Inc dba Hope Harbor
    3× · 2017–2022 · $30k · revenue +53%
  • SC
    SCOTTSDALE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC
    3× · 2017–2022 · $12k · revenue +124%

Funded once

  • CA
    CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • C7
    Concept 7 Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -88%
  • RM
    RESTORE MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -29%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arizona Christian University

Arizona christian university provides a biblically-integrated, liberal arts education equipping graduates to serve the lord jesus christ in all aspects of life, as leaders of influence and excellence.

Education
2
Christian Counseling & Educational Foundation

The Ministry exists to restore Christ to counseling and counseling to the church by thinking biblically about the issues of living. The Ministry does this through teaching, speaking, counseling, and writing.

Human Services
3
His University

His university provides graduate and undergraduate degree and diploma education and training for his family ministry specialists who desire to pursue careers in counseling and ministry.

Education
4
Family of Faith Christian University a Corporation

Family of faith christian university was founded by the decree of the holy spirit for the purpose of educating, discipling, and training laborers for the kingdom of god.

Education
5
Champion Christian College Inc

To develop christ-centered servant leaders through a challenging academic environment in order to impact the world for the kingdom of god.

Education
6
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
7
Alaska Bible College

In accordance with the mandate of matthew 28:19-20 and 2 timothy 2:2, alaska bible college seeks to train servants who lead with christlike character by 1.) nurturing students in bible-based, academic programs that solidify their christian…

Education
8
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
9
California Baptist University

A private institution of higher education, offering both undergraduate and graduate courses to students.

Education
10
Valley Christian Schools

The mission of valley christian schools is to equip students to be culture changers for christ by delivering academic excellence, facilitating spiritual growth, and building lifelong community.

Education
11
Phillips Theological Seminary Corporation

The seminary's mission is to learn and teach how to be: attentive to god; responsible biblical and theological interpreters; faithful individuals, congregations, and communities acting with god to transform the world.

Education
12
Ariel Ministries

Ariel ministries exists to bring the good news of the messiah to jewish people and to disciple believers through intensive bible teaching from a messianic jewish perspective and dispensational theological position. continued on schedule o

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fellowship of Christian Athletes and the most unlike its peers is Neal Pitts Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
7/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Laurel House Inc dba Hope Harbor — $30,000 · OtherLaurel House Inc dba Hope HarborCHILD ABUSE PREVENTION CENTER — $25,000 · OtherCHILD ABUSE PREVENTION CENTERSCOTTSDALE BIBLE CHURCH — $20,002 · OtherSCOTTSDALE BIBLE CHURCHFAMILY MATTERS INC — $18,000 · OtherFAMILY MATTERS INCRestore Ministries — $12,000 · OtherRestore MinistriesIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientConcept 7 Inc — $10,000 · OtherConcept 7 IncFCA — $9,250 · OtherFCA+3 more — $4,000 · OtherCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $40,000 · HealthCYSTIC FIBROSIS FO…SCOTTSDALE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC — $12,292 · EducationSCOTTSDALE CHRIS…PHOENIX SEMINARY INC — $10,000 · EducationPHOENIX SEMINARY…AFRICAN BIBLE COLLEGES INC — $7,977 · EducationAFRICAN BIBLE CO…Grand Canyon University — $5,000 · EducationGrand Canyon Uni…FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentARIZONA URBAN YOUTH MINISTRIES DBA ARIZONA URBAN YOUTH EXCEL — $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentRESTORE MINISTRIES — $10,000 · Crime & LegalJosiah Venture — $5,000 · ReligionHOPE HARBOR INC — $5,000 · ReligionNEAL PITTS FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 · PhilanthropyANAHEIM COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$138,252Health$40,000Education$35,269Youth Development$12,000Crime & Legal$10,000Religion$10,000Philanthropy$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLaurel House Inc dba Hope Harbor — $30,000 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetFAMILY MATTERS INC — $18,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetSCOTTSDALE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC — $12,292 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetConcept 7 Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRESTORE MINISTRIES — $10,000 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHOENIX SEMINARY INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAFRICAN BIBLE COLLEGES INC — $7,977 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJosiah Venture — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE HARBOR INC — $5,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetGrand Canyon University — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA URBAN YOUTH MINISTRIES DBA ARIZONA URBAN YOUTH EXCEL — $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNEAL PITTS FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetANAHEIM COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Thrivent Financial for LutheransMN12.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Thrivent Financial for Lutherans · Servant Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Tim Salmon Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph