Skip to content
The Tim and Leah Chapman Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Tim and Leah Chapman Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$127k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$111k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$361kReligion$312kPhilanthropy$73kHuman Services$70kEducation$35kInternational$18kRecreation & Sports$10kAnimals$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $111k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHURCH OF ELEVEN22$111,046
MONIQUE BURR FOUNDATION$10,000
JIM AND TABITHA FURYK FOUNDATION$5,000
DESIRE STREET MINISTRIES$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $61k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GRACE UNDER THE OAKS: $2k → 6%PROJECT LINUS: $1k → 8%ATLAS MINISTRY INC: $25k → 14%STEPPING STONES EDUCATIONAL THERAPY CENTER INC: $1k → 19%ATLAS MINISTRY INC: $23k → 14%ATLAS MINISTRY: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$741k · 9 repeat orgs$149k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +72% since the first grant, against +36% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
21

Total granted

$741k
$143k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+36%

Still filing today

89%
90%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyHealthHuman ServicesEducationReligionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ES
    Extra Special People Inc
    2× · 2020–2022 · $122k · revenue +386%
  • MH
    MERCY HEALTH CENTER INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $98k · revenue +30%
  • LW
    Liberty Womens Clinic
    2× · 2020–2022 · $60k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • FC
    First Coast Womens Services Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +22%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +106%
  • TT
    THE TOM COUGHLIN JAY FUND FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +94%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saint Joseph's Mercy Care Services Inc

We, saint joseph's health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. honoring the heritage and advancing the ministry of the sisters of…

—
2
St Mary's Good Samaritan Hospital Inc

We, trinity health georgia and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. good samaritan hospital is a member of trinity health georgia and…

Health
3
Saint Joseph's Health System Inc

We, saint joseph's health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. honoring the heritage and advancing the ministry of the sisters of…

Health
4
St Mary's Hospital Inc

We, trinity health georgia and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. st. mary's hospital is a member of trinity health georgia and trinity…

Health
5
St Mary's Sacred Heart Hospital Inc

We, trinity health georgia and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. st. mary's sacred heart hospital is a member of trinity health georgia…

Health
6
Grace Health Inc

To provide patient-centered healthcare with excellence in quality, service and access.

Health
7
Southwest Georgia Healthcare Clinics Inc

To provide, at the direction of our medical staff, a uniform level of such high-quality curative and palliative health care and diagnostic services as are within our scope of services to all who seek our aid, regardless of their ability to…

Health
8
Mercy Services Downtown Inc

We, saint joseph's health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. honoring the heritage and advancing the ministry of the sisters of…

—
9
Starkville Pregnancy Care Center

Christ centered ministry whose mission is to promote a culture for life within our community by serving people facing unexpected pregnancies, and to empower men and women to make wise choices by promoting the benefits of healthly relations…

Human Services
10
Our Lady of Mercy Life Center

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. our lady of mercy life center is a member of st. peter's health…

—
11
Mend Medical Services Inc

Mend medical services offers professional medical services in a confidential environment. mend has operated since 1987 in tulsa, offering free limited obstetrical ultrasounds, pregnancy tests, sti testing, and the abortion pill reversal…

Health
12
Mercy Care Foundation Inc

We, saint joseph's health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. honoring the heritage and advancing the ministry of the sisters of…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Mary's Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Jim and Tabitha Furyk Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
21/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHURCH OF ELEVEN22: $311,046 · OtherCHURCH OF ELEVEN22Extra Special People Inc: $122,000 · OtherExtra Special People Inc+8 more: $33,500 · Other+8 moreMERCY HEALTH CENTER INC: $97,500 · HealthMERCY HEALTH CENTER INCLiberty Womens Clinic: $60,000 · HealthLiberty Womens ClinicFirst Coast Womens Services Inc: $50,000 · HealthFirst Coast Womens Services…+3 more: $8,750 · HealthTHE KIRBY SMART FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · PhilanthropyTHE KIRBY …MONIQUE BURR FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN INC: $28,000 · PhilanthropyMONIQUE BU…THE TOM COUGHLIN JAY FUND FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyTHE TOM CO…The Boselli Foundation: $10,000 · PhilanthropyThe Bosell…THE JIM AND TABITHA FURYK FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyTHE JIM AN…+1 more: $2,500 · PhilanthropyATLAS Ministry Inc: $57,500 · Human Services+3 more: $3,500 · Human ServicesNORTHLAND CHRISTIAN EDUCATION SYSTEM: $30,000 · EducationGeorgia Lions Lighthouse Foundation Inc: $2,500 · EducationOCONEE AREA RESOURCE COUNCIL INC: $2,500 · EducationSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $15,000 · ReligionDesire Street Ministries: $1,000 · ReligionCongaree Foundation: $10,000 · Youth Development
Other$466,546Health$216,250Philanthropy$85,500Human Services$61,000Education$35,000Religion$16,000Youth Development$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetExtra Special People Inc: $122,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetMERCY HEALTH CENTER INC: $97,500 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetLiberty Womens Clinic: $60,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetATLAS Ministry Inc: $57,500 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetFirst Coast Womens Services Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTHE KIRBY SMART FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetNORTHLAND CHRISTIAN EDUCATION SYSTEM: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMONIQUE BURR FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN INC: $28,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TOM COUGHLIN JAY FUND FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Boselli Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetST MARY'S GOOD SAMARITAN FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCongaree Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $5,250 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD COOPERATIVE MINISTRIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHOMASVILLE-THOMAS COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetWOODSON CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JIM AND TABITHA FURYK FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGARY AND VIVIENNE PLAYER FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGeorgia Lions Lighthouse Foundation Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST MARY'S FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOCONEE AREA RESOURCE COUNCIL INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetOAKHILL DAY SCHOOL: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGrace Under the Oaks Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetKANSAS CITY METROPOLITAN CRIME COMMISSION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT LINUS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPPING STONES EDUCATIONAL THERAPY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHERE TOMORROW INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDesire Street Ministries: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Georgia Power Foundat…Pga Tour IncAthens Area Community…The Georgia Club Foun…The Newland Family Fo…Tr Lois & Lucy Lampki…Jackson Emc Foundatio…The Community Foundat…Servant FoundationRaymond James Charita…The Community Foundat…Natl Christian Charit…
Georgia Power Foundation IncGA18.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Pga Tour Inc · Athens Area Community Foundation Inc · The Georgia Club Foundation Inc · The Newland Family Foundation Inc · Tr Lois & Lucy Lampkin Fdn Ua · Jackson Emc Foundation Inc Attn Amy Rouse · The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida Inc · Servant Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Tim and Leah Chapman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Tim and Leah Chapman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Tim and Leah Chapman Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Tim and Leah Chapman Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tim and Leah Chapman’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home