Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Tim and Leah Chapman Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$127k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$111k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

Health$361kReligion$312kPhilanthropy$73kHuman Services$70kEducation$35kInternational$18kRecreation & Sports$10kAnimals$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $111k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHURCH OF ELEVEN22$111,046
MONIQUE BURR FOUNDATION$10,000
JIM AND TABITHA FURYK FOUNDATION$5,000
DESIRE STREET MINISTRIES$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $61k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GRACE UNDER THE OAKS: $2k → 6%PROJECT LINUS: $1k → 8%ATLAS MINISTRY INC: $25k → 14%STEPPING STONES EDUCATIONAL THERAPY CENTER INC: $1k → 19%ATLAS MINISTRY INC: $23k → 14%ATLAS MINISTRY: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$741k · 9 repeat orgs$149k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +72% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
21

Total granted

$741k
$143k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+36%

Still filing today

89%
90%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyHealthHuman ServicesEducationReligionYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ES
    Extra Special People Inc
    2× · 2020–2022 · $122k · revenue +386%
  • MH
    MERCY HEALTH CENTER INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $98k · revenue +30%
  • LW
    Liberty Womens Clinic
    2× · 2020–2022 · $60k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • FC
    First Coast Womens Services Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +17%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +106%
  • CF
    Congaree Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +136%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saint Joseph's Mercy Care Services Inc

We, saint joseph's health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. honoring the heritage and advancing the ministry of the sisters of…

—
2
St Mary's Good Samaritan Hospital Inc

We, trinity health georgia and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. good samaritan hospital is a member of trinity health georgia and…

Health
3
Saint Joseph's Health System Inc

We, saint joseph's health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. honoring the heritage and advancing the ministry of the sisters of…

Health
4
St Mary's Hospital Inc

We, trinity health georgia and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. st. mary's hospital is a member of trinity health georgia and trinity…

Health
5
St Mary's Sacred Heart Hospital Inc

We, trinity health georgia and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. st. mary's sacred heart hospital is a member of trinity health georgia…

Health
6
Grace Health Inc

To provide patient-centered healthcare with excellence in quality, service and access.

Health
7
Southwest Georgia Healthcare Clinics Inc

To provide, at the direction of our medical staff, a uniform level of such high-quality curative and palliative health care and diagnostic services as are within our scope of services to all who seek our aid, regardless of their ability to…

Health
8
Mercy Services Downtown Inc

We, saint joseph's health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. honoring the heritage and advancing the ministry of the sisters of…

—
9
Starkville Pregnancy Care Center

Christ centered ministry whose mission is to promote a culture for life within our community by serving people facing unexpected pregnancies, and to empower men and women to make wise choices by promoting the benefits of healthly relations…

Human Services
10
Our Lady of Mercy Life Center

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. our lady of mercy life center is a member of st. peter's health…

—
11
Mend Medical Services Inc

Mend medical services offers professional medical services in a confidential environment. mend has operated since 1987 in tulsa, offering free limited obstetrical ultrasounds, pregnancy tests, sti testing, and the abortion pill reversal…

Health
12
Mercy Care Foundation Inc

We, saint joseph's health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. honoring the heritage and advancing the ministry of the sisters of…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Mary's Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Jim and Tabitha Furyk Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPregnancy Support ServicesCancer Support ServicesEquine Therapy ProgramsCommunity FoundationsAnimal Rescue and ShelterYouth Sports ProgramsIndependent K-12 SchoolsHealth Access Advocacy and …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr16%37%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%15%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%3%10–20yr16%60%20–35yr13%27%35–55yr16%3%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/30
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,535

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
21/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHURCH OF ELEVEN22 — $311,046 · OtherCHURCH OF ELEVEN22Extra Special People Inc — $122,000 · OtherExtra Special People Inc+8 more — $33,500 · Other+8 moreMERCY HEALTH CENTER INC — $97,500 · HealthMERCY HEALTH CENTER INCLiberty Womens Clinic — $60,000 · HealthLiberty Womens ClinicFirst Coast Womens Services Inc — $50,000 · HealthFirst Coast Womens Services…+3 more — $8,750 · HealthTHE KIRBY SMART FAMILY FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 · PhilanthropyTHE KIRBY …MONIQUE BURR FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN INC — $28,000 · PhilanthropyMONIQUE BU…THE TOM COUGHLIN JAY FUND FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropyTHE TOM CO…The Boselli Foundation — $10,000 · PhilanthropyThe Bosell…THE JIM AND TABITHA FURYK FOUNDATION — $5,000 · PhilanthropyTHE JIM AN…+1 more — $2,500 · PhilanthropyATLAS Ministry Inc — $57,500 · Human Services+3 more — $3,500 · Human ServicesNORTHLAND CHRISTIAN EDUCATION SYSTEM — $30,000 · EducationGeorgia Lions Lighthouse Foundation Inc — $2,500 · EducationOCONEE AREA RESOURCE COUNCIL INC — $2,500 · EducationSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $15,000 · ReligionDesire Street Ministries — $1,000 · ReligionCongaree Foundation — $10,000 · Youth Development
Other$466,546Health$216,250Philanthropy$85,500Human Services$61,000Education$35,000Religion$16,000Youth Development$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetExtra Special People Inc — $122,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetMERCY HEALTH CENTER INC — $97,500 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetLiberty Womens Clinic — $60,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetATLAS Ministry Inc — $57,500 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetFirst Coast Womens Services Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTHE KIRBY SMART FAMILY FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetNORTHLAND CHRISTIAN EDUCATION SYSTEM — $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMONIQUE BURR FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN INC — $28,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCongaree Foundation — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE TOM COUGHLIN JAY FUND FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Boselli Foundation — $10,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetST MARY'S GOOD SAMARITAN FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE CANCER FOUNDATION INC — $5,250 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHOMASVILLE-THOMAS COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE JIM AND TABITHA FURYK FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD COOPERATIVE MINISTRIES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWOODSON CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGARY AND VIVIENNE PLAYER FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetST MARY'S FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGeorgia Lions Lighthouse Foundation Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOCONEE AREA RESOURCE COUNCIL INC — $2,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetOAKHILL DAY SCHOOL — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGrace Under the Oaks Inc — $1,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetKANSAS CITY METROPOLITAN CRIME COMMISSION — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPPING STONES EDUCATIONAL THERAPY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHERE TOMORROW INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDesire Street Ministries — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT LINUS — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Georgia Power Foundat…Pga Tour IncAthens Area Community…The Georgia Club Foun…The Newland Family Fo…Tr Lois & Lucy Lampki…Jackson Emc Foundatio…The Community Foundat…Servant FoundationRaymond James Charita…The Community Foundat…Natl Christian Charit…
Georgia Power Foundation IncGA18.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Pga Tour Inc · Athens Area Community Foundation Inc · The Georgia Club Foundation Inc · The Newland Family Foundation Inc · Tr Lois & Lucy Lampkin Fdn Ua · Jackson Emc Foundation Inc Attn Amy Rouse · The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida Inc · Servant Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Tim and Leah Chapman Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Tim and Leah Chapman Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Tim and Leah Chapman Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines