Skip to content
The Texas Cavaliers Charitable Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

The Texas Cavaliers Charitable Foundation

The foundation's exempt purpose is to encourage, foster, support, and conduct activities and programs which will benefit children residing within texas.

$2.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
55
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$550k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$2.4MHealth$2.2MRecreation & Sports$2.0MHuman Services$1.8MHousing & Shelter$1.4MAnimals$1.2MYouth Development$917kArts & Culture$479kOther$0
02FY2025 · 55 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 55 grants below total $1,905,070, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,099,189 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $194,119 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k27 grants · $191k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $348k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $816k
  • $250k+1 grant · $550k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRACKENRIDGE PARK CONSERVANCY$550,000
SA LIFE ACADEMY$103,820
RESPITE CARE OF SAN ANTONIO$103,480
THE ARC OF SAN ANTONIO$102,710
MISSION ROAD MINISTRIES$102,560
SPECIAL REACH INC$101,230
BRIGHTON CENTER$101,070
THE RISE SCHOOL OF SA$100,850
SA COMMUNITY RESOURCE DIRECTO$50,000
YWCA SAN ANTONIO$50,000
LITTLE FLOWER SCHOOL$45,000
FAMILY SERVICE ASSOC OF SA$45,000
HEALY-MURPHY CHILD DEV CENTER$40,000
SAISD FOUNDATION$40,000
LEAVEN KIDS$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ST JUDES RANCH FOR CHILDREN: $55k → 7%PAT GREEN FOUNDATION: $83k → 11%ST JUDES RANCH FOR CHILDREN: $10k → 7%PROJECT INFINITY: $9k → 16%ST JUDES RANCH FOR CHILDREN: $8k → 7%FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION: $12k → 16%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $39k → 16%SPECIAL REACH INC: $101k → 16%THE CHILDRENS SHELTER: $34k → 16%THE CHILDRENS SHELTER: $30k → 16%THE CHILDRENS SHELTER: $16k → 16%THE CHILDRENS SHELTER: $11k → 16%SPECIAL REACH INC: $8k → 16%GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER: $50k → 16%GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER: $16k → 16%HOUSE OF NEIGHBORLY SERVICE: $15k → 16%GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER: $12k → 16%HOUSE OF NEIGHBORLY SERVICE: $10k → 16%CHRISTIAN ASSISTANCE MINISTRY: $10k → 16%TEXAS BURN SURVIVOR SOCIETY: $9k → 16%BOYSVILLE INC: $12k → 16%BOYSVILLE INC: $11k → 16%MADONNA CENTER: $10k → 16%GIRLS INC OF SAN ANTONIO: $53k → 16%GIRLS INC OF SAN ANTONIO: $11k → 16%REACHING MAXIMUM INDEPENDENCE: $10k → 16%RESPITE CARE OF SAN ANTONIO: $103k → 16%GUARDIAN HOUSE: $50k → 16%FAMILY SERVICE ASSOC OF SA: $45k → 16%CHILDRENS BEREAVEMENT CENTER: $40k → 16%RESPITE CARE OF SAN ANTONIO: $37k → 16%RESPITE CARE OF SAN ANTONIO: $30k → 16%CHILDRENS BEREAVEMENT CENTER: $28k → 16%CHILDRENS BEREAVEMENT CENTER: $24k → 16%CHILDRENS BEREAVEMENT CENTER: $23k → 16%RESPITE CARE OF SAN ANTONIO: $13k → 16%ANY BABY CAN OF SAN ANTONIO: $13k → 16%CHILDRENS BEREAVEMENT CENTER: $10k → 16%GIRLS INC: $47k → 16%GIRLS INC: $21k → 16%MISSION RD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $25k → 16%GIRLS INC: $20k → 16%MISSION RD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $24k → 16%MISSION RD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $20k → 16%HOPE HOUSE MINISTRIES: $143k → 16%MISSION RD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $8k → 16%HOPE HOUSE MINISTRIES: $26k → 16%GIRLS INC: $9k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$11M · 72 repeat orgs$2.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

72 repeat relationships: 39 still active in FY2025, 33 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

72
27

Total granted

$11M
$1.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
0%

Still filing today

88%
89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $365k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    Haven for Hope of Bexar County
    2× · 2018–2022 · $1.2M · revenue +21%
  • SA
    SAN ANTONIO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +84%
  • CC
    CHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
    5× · 2017–2021 · $636k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • RT
    Remember the Alamo Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $1.3M · revenue -9%
  • TE
    TOLLA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • TP
    THE PAT GREEN FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $83k · revenue +725%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Antonio Foster Care and Adoption and Services

San antonio foster care and adoption services inc. is a licensed child placement agency in the state of texas. the organization cares for children placed in foster care by the state of texas.

Human Services
2
Discovery School of San Antonio

At Discovery School, our mission is to inspire and nurture the love of learning in young children and their families. The School offers an enhanced early childhood education for children 2 through 7 years to provide them with the skills…

Education
3
Sa Talent Inc Sa Works

The mission of sa talent, inc. is to educate and develop youth and adults into the talent needs of san antonio's current and future employers and provide services for the regional employers for the retention and growth of their local…

Education
4
San Antonio Christian School

Partner with families to provide students a christ-centered education while fostering a life of faith and service. the school desires to associate with like-minded teachers, administrators, staff, parents, and students to communicate the…

—
5
San Antonio Automobile Dealers Association Foundation Inc
—
6
Tennis Officials of San Antonio Association
Recreation & Sports
7
San Antonio Report

Publishing a local online news source. We believe a well informed and connected community is essential to making San Antonio a better place to live, work and play.

Arts & Culture
8
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of San Antonio Inc

To provide a safe, caring, and temporary home away from home for the families of children receiving essential medical services in san antonio, texas.

Health
9
Child Advocates San Antonio

To recruit, develop, and lead court-appointed volunteer advocates who provide constancy for abused and neglected children and youth while advocating for services and placement in safe and permanent homes.

Civil Rights
10
Greater Satx

The mission of greater:satx is to lead the developemnt and diversification of san antonio regional economy through the recruitment and expansion of qualify employers and job producing investments.

—
11
Southwest Winners Foundation Inc

The mission of Southwest Winners Foundation is to provide an adaptive and effective learning environment that prepares students for success in the workplace and/or college.

Education
12
Advocates Social Services of San Antonio Texas

To educate qualified individuals of public benefits that they may be entitled to. we accomplish this by working with local city, state, and federal agencies for the purpose of outreach and verification work. recently we have focused mainly…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Brothers Big Sisters of South Texas Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sa Life Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

100 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 100 of the 114 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
25
Early backer (in before they grew)
97/100
Grantees still filing
63/100
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KIPP SAN ANTONIO INC: $370,560 · OtherKIPP SAN ANTONIO INCTHE WINSTON SCHOOL SAN ANTONIO: $299,098 · OtherTHE WINSTON SCHOOL SAN ANTONIOST PETER-ST JOSEPH CHILDRENS HOME: $183,010 · OtherLORDS WAY INC: $169,731 · OtherSAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $149,375 · OtherBRIGHTON CENTER: $193,805 · OtherTEAMABILITY INC: $187,675 · OtherCity Kids Adventures: $338,281 · OtherCity Kids Adventures+55 more: $2,388,014 · Other+55 moreRemember the Alamo Foundation: $1,250,000 · Arts & CultureRemember the A…Witte Museum: $125,000 · Arts & CultureWitte MuseumMAGIK CHILDRENS THEATRE OF SAN ANTONIO DBA THE MAGIK THEATRE: $88,500 · Arts & CultureSAN ANTONIO PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $80,000 · Arts & Culture+5 more: $138,106 · Arts & Culture+5 moreRespite Care of San Antonio Inc: $190,780 · Human ServicesRespite Care …HOPE HOUSE MINISTRIES: $176,488 · Human ServicesHOPE HOUSE MI…GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SAN ANTONIO: $176,477 · Human ServicesGIRLS INCORPO…CHILDRENS BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TEXAS: $145,124 · Human ServicesCHILDRENS BER…Special Reach Inc: $108,730 · Human ServicesSpecial Reach…THE CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $102,400 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'…MISSION ROAD DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER: $93,716 · Human ServicesMISSION ROAD …GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO: $88,131 · Human ServicesGOOD SAMARITA…THE PAT GREEN FOUNDATION: $83,233 · Human ServicesTHE PAT GREEN…SJRC TEXAS INC: $78,200 · Human ServicesGUARDIAN HOUSE: $61,425 · Human Services+12 more: $245,599 · Human Services+12 moreMorgan's Wonderland: $838,775 · Recreation & SportsMorgan's Wond…Brackenridge Park Conservancy: $600,000 · Recreation & SportsBrackenridge …Kinetic Kids Inc: $57,164 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $5,500 · Recreation & SportsCHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $635,675 · HealthCHRISTUS CHI…RISE RECOVERY: $388,000 · HealthRISE RECOVER…THE ARC OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $110,210 · HealthTHE ARC OF S…BELIEVE IT FOUNDATION: $87,125 · HealthBELIEVE IT F…AUGUSTHEART: $57,275 · Health+7 more: $149,625 · Health+7 moreHaven for Hope of Bexar County: $1,204,560 · Housing & ShelterHaven for …+1 more: $8,100 · Housing & ShelterSAN ANTONIO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $1,204,296 · AnimalsSAN ANTONI…
Other$4,279,549Arts & Culture$1,681,606Human Services$1,550,303Recreation & Sports$1,501,439Health$1,427,910Housing & Shelter$1,212,660Animals$1,204,296

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRemember the Alamo Foundation: $1,250,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetHaven for Hope of Bexar County: $1,204,560 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetSAN ANTONIO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $1,204,296 over 8y, 4.2% of budgetMorgan's Wonderland: $838,775 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $635,675 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetBrackenridge Park Conservancy: $600,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetRISE RECOVERY: $388,000 over 3y, 9.8% of budgetKIPP SAN ANTONIO INC: $370,560 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCity Kids Adventures: $338,281 over 8y, 28% of budgetTHE WINSTON SCHOOL SAN ANTONIO: $299,098 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetBRIGHTON CENTER: $193,805 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetRespite Care of San Antonio Inc: $190,780 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetTEAMABILITY INC: $187,675 over 8y, 5.5% of budgetHOPE HOUSE MINISTRIES: $176,488 over 3y, 13% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF SAN ANTONIO: $176,477 over 8y, 2.7% of budgetSAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $149,375 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDRENS BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TEXAS: $145,124 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL & SOUTH TEXAS: $133,775 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetSan Antonio Foundation for Excellence in Education Inc: $133,425 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetSA Life Academy: $125,220 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetWitte Museum: $125,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE ARC OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $110,210 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetMISSION ROAD MINISTRIES: $109,110 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetSpecial Reach Inc: $108,730 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $102,400 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetSUNSHINE COTTAGE SCHOOL FOR DEAF CHILDREN: $96,370 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SAN ANTONIO: $95,425 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetMISSION ROAD DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER: $93,716 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMAGIK CHILDRENS THEATRE OF SAN ANTONIO DBA THE MAGIK THEATRE: $88,500 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO: $88,131 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $87,325 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBELIEVE IT FOUNDATION: $87,125 over 7y, 5.4% of budgetSOUTHWEST SCHOOL OF ART: $86,506 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetSAN ANTONIO PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetSAY SI: $79,655 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetSJRC TEXAS INC: $78,200 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetHEALY-MURPHY CENTER: $76,925 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SAN ANTONIO: $61,975 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetGUARDIAN HOUSE: $61,425 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetSAN ANTONIO YOUNG WOMEN'S LEADERSHIP ACADEMY FOUNDATION: $60,425 over 2y, 47% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SAN ANTONIO AND BEXAR COUNTY: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAUGUSTHEART: $57,275 over 7y, 4.0% of budgetKinetic Kids Inc: $57,164 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTH TEXAS INC: $55,310 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetSAN ANTONIO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $51,881 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetAUTISM SERVICE CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO DBA AUTISM COMMUNITY NETWORK: $50,925 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetFamily Service Association of San Antonio Inc: $50,425 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYWCA SAN ANTONIO SUPPORT CORPORATION: $50,000 over 1y, 17% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Remember the Alamo Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Haven for Hope of Bexar County ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Morgan's Wonderland ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Brackenridge Park Conservancy ↗
  • Who funds RISE RECOVERY ↗
  • Who funds KIPP SAN ANTONIO INC ↗
  • Who funds City Kids Adventures ↗
  • Who funds THE WINSTON SCHOOL SAN ANTONIO ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHTON CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Respite Care of San Antonio Inc ↗
  • Who funds TEAMABILITY INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HOUSE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SAN ANTONIO ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRENS BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL & SOUTH TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds San Antonio Foundation for Excellence in Education Inc ↗
  • Who funds SA Life Academy ↗
  • Who funds Witte Museum ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC OF SAN ANTONIO INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSION ROAD MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Special Reach Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds SUNSHINE COTTAGE SCHOOL FOR DEAF CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SAN ANTONIO ↗
  • Who funds MISSION ROAD DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MAGIK CHILDRENS THEATRE OF SAN ANTONIO DBA THE MAGIK THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BELIEVE IT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST SCHOOL OF ART ↗
  • Who funds THE PAT GREEN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Antonio Area Foun…Faye L & William L Co…Harvey E Najim Charit…The Charity Ball Asso…Nancy Smith Hurd Foun…Elizabeth Huth Coates…Pryor Myra Stafford C…John L Santikos Chari…Betty Stieren Kelso F…United Way of San Ant…St Luke's Lutheran He…Mays Family Foundation
San Antonio Area FoundationTX139.4× affinity76 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation · The Charity Ball Association of San Antonio Inc · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · Elizabeth Huth Coates Charitable Foundation of 1992 · Pryor Myra Stafford Char Tr F0030100 · John L Santikos Charitable Foundation · Betty Stieren Kelso Foundation · United Way of San Antonio and Bexar County · St Luke's Lutheran Health Ministries Inc · Mays Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Texas Cavaliers Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Texas Cavaliers Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    32report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 114 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Texas Cavaliers’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home