Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Talbott and Ann Bond Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$17k
Granted FY2025still arriving
43
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$33kReligion$19kEnvironment$18kCommunity Improvement$13kAnimals$8kHuman Services$5kArts & Culture$5kFood & Nutrition$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 43 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$200
Median grant
13
States reached
$195k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AM FUND$4,900
TOWN OF ROCKPORT$1,650
ST THOMAS PRE SCHOOL$1,500
CHEBEAGUE ISLAND RECREATION CENTER$1,100
MARYLAND FAMILY NETWORK$1,000
The Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception$500
EWTN$500
FIRST TEE - GREATER BALTIMORE$500
FARA$500
LIVING CLASSROOMS$375
ART WITH A HEART$250
GREENPEACE FUND$250
DEFENDERS OF ANIMAL RIGHT$250
FRIENDS SCHOOL$250
INTERNATIONAL RHINO FOUNDATION$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $50 → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $50 → 9%MARYLAND FAMILY NETWORK: $1k → 19%MARYLAND FAMILY NETWORK: $1k → 19%THE RECOMPENSE FUND: $150 → 7%THE RECOMPENSE FUND: $100 → 7%THE RECOMPENSE FUND: $100 → 7%ART WITH A HEART: $500 → 19%ART WITH A HEART: $500 → 19%ART WITH A HEART: $250 → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $200 → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $200 → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $100 → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $100 → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $100 → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IA
PA
NJ
CA
MO
KY
VA
MD
KS
TN
NC
DC
MS
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of The Talbott and Ann Bond Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Talbott and Ann Bond Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$88k · 66 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

66 repeat relationships: 35 still active in FY2025, 31 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

66
52

Total granted

$88k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+22%

Still filing today

52%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentHuman ServicesEducationAnimalsArts & CultureReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2022–2024 · $14k · revenue +6%
  • EW
    ETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $3k · revenue +27%
  • TO
    THE ODYSSEY SCHOOL INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $3k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • WU
    Washington University in St. Louis
    one grant, 2021 · $4k
  • IN
    IRVINE NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER INC
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +24%
  • MF
    Maryland Food Bank
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
3
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
4
National Audubon Society Inc

We work towards a future where birds thrive across the americas because audubon is a powerful, diverse, and ever-growing force for conservation. (continued on schedule o).

Environment
5
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
6
The Wildlife Society

The wildlife society's mission is to inspire, empower, and enable wildlife professionals to sustain wildlife populations and habitats through science-based management and conservation.

Animals
7
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
8
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
9
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
10
Climate Institute

The climate institute is organized for the purpose of educating the general public and policy makers as to the gravity of potential climate change, exploring the policy implications of the latest scientific findings on climate modelling…

Environment
11
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
12
Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy

Iatp works locally and globally at the intersection of policy and practice to ensure fair and sustainable food, farm and trade systems.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wikimedia Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Dynamic Catholic Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 126 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/46
Grantees still filing
33/46
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AM FUND: $12,700 · OtherAM FUNDSaint John Paul II National Shrine: $3,500 · OtherWashington University in St. Louis: $3,500 · OtherBRYN MAWR SCHOOL: $3,100 · OtherST THOMAS PRE SCHOOL: $3,000 · Other+89 more: $47,265 · Other+89 moreWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $14,100 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERS…THE ODYSSEY SCHOOL INC: $2,500 · EducationTHE ODYSSEY SCHOOL…SWEET BRIAR INSTITUTE: $900 · Education+3 more: $700 · EducationIRVINE NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER INC: $3,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $1,575 · EnvironmentGREEN SPRING VALLEY GARDEN CLUB INC: $1,000 · EnvironmentOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $650 · EnvironmentCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $500 · EnvironmentGREENPEACE FUND INC: $250 · Environment+1 more: $50 · EnvironmentDEFENDERS OF ANIMAL RIGHTS INC: $2,500 · AnimalsTHE INTERNATIONAL RHINO FOUNDATION: $1,250 · AnimalsPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC: $900 · AnimalsTHE MARYLAND SPCA INC: $750 · AnimalsTHE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER: $250 · AnimalsMARYLAND FAMILY NETWORK INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesArt With a Heart Inc: $1,250 · Human ServicesASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $700 · Human ServicesTHE RECOMPENSE FUND: $350 · Human Services+3 more: $225 · Human ServicesETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC: $3,000 · ReligionRENEWAL MINISTRIES INC: $350 · ReligionTHE DYNAMIC CATHOLIC INSTITUTE: $200 · ReligionGREATER RUXTON AREA FOUNDATION INC: $1,050 · Arts & CultureSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $500 · Arts & CultureGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $475 · Arts & CultureMARINES' MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $175 · Arts & Culture
Other$73,065Education$18,200Environment$7,025Animals$5,650Human Services$4,525Religion$3,550Arts & Culture$2,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $14,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetIRVINE NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ODYSSEY SCHOOL INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDEFENDERS OF ANIMAL RIGHTS INC: $2,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMARYLAND FAMILY NETWORK INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FIRST TEE OF GREATER BALTIMORE INC: $1,750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $1,575 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetArt With a Heart Inc: $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INTERNATIONAL RHINO FOUNDATION: $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER RUXTON AREA FOUNDATION INC: $1,050 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetGREENPEACE INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREEN SPRING VALLEY GARDEN CLUB INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC: $1,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRAINFOREST TRUST: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPAUL'S PLACE INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC: $900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSWEET BRIAR INSTITUTE: $900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARYLAND SPCA INC: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $650 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetChebeague Island Historical Society: $650 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY TRUST: $600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGreensboro College: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $475 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKENNEDY KRIEGER FOUNDATION INC: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH FOR LIFE ACTION: $400 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSIERRA CLUB: $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIEDREICH'S ATAXIA RESEARCH ALLIANCE: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RECOMPENSE FUND: $350 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRENEWAL MINISTRIES INC: $350 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER: $250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLIVE ACTION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DYNAMIC CATHOLIC INSTITUTE: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARINES' MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $175 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHEBEAGUE ISLAND LIBRARY: $150 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMaine Media College: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $50 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDucks Unlimited Inc: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds IRVINE NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ODYSSEY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds DEFENDERS OF ANIMAL RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds MARYLAND FAMILY NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FIRST TEE OF GREATER BALTIMORE INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Art With a Heart Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE INTERNATIONAL RHINO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GREATER RUXTON AREA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENPEACE INC ↗
  • Who funds GREEN SPRING VALLEY GARDEN CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds RAINFOREST TRUST ↗
  • Who funds PAUL'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC ↗
  • Who funds SWEET BRIAR INSTITUTE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The United Way of Central Maryland IncMD19.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · Ac and Penney Hubbard Foundation Inc · Mary Jean and Oliver Travers Foundation Inc · Venable Foundation Inc · Brown Advisory Charitable Foundation Inc · The Keith Campbell Foundation for the Environment Inc · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Baird Foundation Inc · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Talbott and Ann Bond Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Talbott and Ann Bond Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Chesapeake Bay Trust: 100% of income from government
  • Maryland Family Network Inc: 66% of income from government
  • Paul's Place Inc: 29% of income from government
  • The Maryland Food Bank Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Associated Catholic Charities Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Art With a Heart Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Talbott and Ann Bond Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Talbott and Ann Bond Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 126 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Talbott and Ann Bond Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph