Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Sue & Bob McCollum Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Religion$3.7MHealth$2.2MEducation$290kRecreation & Sports$208kInternational$170kArts & Culture$68kCrime & Legal$60kCivil Rights$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $300k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $146k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
$15,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$7.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHURCH AT THE RED DOOR$1,000,000
MENLO PARK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$90,000
UNITED STATES SKI TEAM FOUNDATION$56,000
PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF THE BIG WOOD$45,000
SAMARITANS PURSE$30,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$30,000
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$25,000
CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INC$25,000
BILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION$20,000
IN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC$20,000
FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE$20,000
PATHWAYS HOME HEALTH AND HOSPICE$15,000
PRIORITY LIVING INC$10,000
SUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION$10,000
FRESH LIFELINES FOR YOUTH INC$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 75% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF THE BIG WOOD: $60k → 7%MENLO PARK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $120k → 7%FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE: $20k → 5%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $1.0M → 14%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $25k → 14%SAMARITANS PURSE: $30k → 21%UNITED STATES SKI TEAM FOUNDATION: $56k → 5%IN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC: $20k → 14%PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF THE BIG WOOD: $60k → 7%MENLO PARK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $120k → 7%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $500k → 14%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $25k → 14%SAMARITANS PURSE: $30k → 21%UNITED STATES SKI TEAM FOUNDATION: $56k → 5%IN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC: $20k → 14%PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF THE BIG WOOD: $60k → 7%MENLO PARK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $120k → 7%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $500k → 14%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $25k → 14%SAMARITANS PURSE: $30k → 21%UNITED STATES SKI TEAM FOUNDATION: $30k → 5%IN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC: $20k → 14%PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF THE BIG WOOD: $60k → 7%MENLO PARK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $120k → 7%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $20k → 14%SAMARITANS PURSE: $30k → 21%UNITED STATES SKI TEAM FOUNDATION: $30k → 5%IN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC: $20k → 14%PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF THE BIG WOOD: $45k → 7%MENLO PARK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $90k → 7%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $15k → 14%SAMARITANS PURSE: $30k → 21%UNITED STATES SKI TEAM FOUNDATION: $26k → 5%PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF THE BIG WOOD: $40k → 7%MENLO PARK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $80k → 7%CHURCH AT THE RED DOOR: $1.0M → 11%SAMARITANS PURSE: $20k → 21%CHURCH AT THE RED DOOR: $1.0M → 11%CHURCH AT THE RED DOOR: $60k → 11%CHURCH AT THE RED DOOR: $60k → 11%CHURCH AT THE RED DOOR: $60k → 11%CHURCH AT THE RED DOOR: $40k → 11%CHURCH AT THE RED DOOR: $15k → 11%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $30k → 8%HOOVER INSTITUTION -STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $30k → 8%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $30k → 8%HOOVER INSTITUTION -STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $30k → 8%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $30k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ID
MI
NJ
CA
UT
AZ
NC
OK
LA
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.5M · 23 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
5

Total granted

$6.5M
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+29%

Still filing today

70%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHealthArts & CultureRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • US
    United States Ski Team Foundation
    6× · 2020–2025 · $208k · revenue +82%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $170k · revenue +106%
  • IT
    IN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $100k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • SU
    STANFORD UNIVERSITY - HOOVER INSTITUTION
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
  • SV
    SUN VALLEY SUMMER SYMPHONY INC - SUN VALLEY MUSIC
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
  • MC
    MARINERS CHRISTIAN SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +29%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
2
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
3
University of Northwestern - St Paul

See schedule o. founded in 1902, university of northwestern - st. paul is a nondenominational christian university that integrates the educational philosophy of "faith, learning and living" through two focuses: higher education and media.…

Education
4
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
5
Loma Linda University

Loma linda university, a seventh-day adventist christian health sciences institution, seeks to further the healing and teaching ministry of jesus christ "to make man whole" by: - educating ethical and proficient christian health…

Education
6
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
7
Pacific School of Religion

Pacific school of religion prepares a diverse cadre of spiritually rooted leaders with the vision, resilience, and skill to create a world where all can thrive. grounded in the rigorous study and faithful practice of progressive christian…

Education
8
The Institute On Religion and Public Life Inc

The institute on religion and public life is an interreligious, nonpartisan research and educational 501(c)(3) organization. the institute's mission is to articulate a governing consensus that supports: (see schedule o)- a religiously…

9
Dominican University of California

Our institutional mission is to educate and prepare students to be ethical leaders and socially responsible global citizens who incorporate the dominican values of study, reflection, community and service into their lives.

Education
10
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
11
Southern Wesleyan University

Southern wesleyan university is a christ-centered, student-focused learning community devoted to transforming lives by challenging students to be dedicated scholars and servant-leaders who impact the world for christ.

Education
12
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Usga Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The National World War Ii Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Ice Hockey ProgramsGovernment Accountability R…Classical Music EnsemblesIndependent K-8 SchoolsCommunity Arts OrganizationsHospice Care ServicesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community Health CentersChristian Missionary Organi…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%4%5–10yr20%16%10–20yr17%28%20–35yr11%28%35–55yr13%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%34%5–10yr20%16%10–20yr17%5%20–35yr11%7%35–55yr13%37%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,952

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
18/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHURCH AT THE RED DOOR — $2,235,000 · OtherCHURCH AT THE RED DOORREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN — $2,000,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANMENLO PARK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $650,000 · OtherMENLO PARK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHPRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF THE BIG WOOD — $330,000 · OtherPRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF THE BIG WOOD+11 more — $492,500 · Other+11 moreSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $170,000 · ReligionIN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC — $100,000 · ReligionPRIORITY LIVING INC — $50,000 · Religion+1 more — $10,000 · ReligionTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $150,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $115,000 · EducationNORTHRISE UNIVERSITY INITIATIVE — $20,000 · EducationUnited States Ski Team Foundation — $208,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more — $200 · Recreation & SportsST LUKE'S WOOD RIVER FOUNDATION INC — $55,000 · HealthEisenhower Medical Center — $50,000 · HealthSUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $50,000 · HealthTHE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM INC — $28,000 · Arts & CultureKQED INC — $27,500 · Arts & CultureSUN VALLEY SUMMER SYMPHONY INC — $6,000 · Arts & CultureFRESH LIFELINES FOR YOUTH INC — $60,000 · Youth Development
Other$5,707,500Religion$330,000Education$285,000Recreation & Sports$208,200Health$155,000Arts & Culture$61,500Youth Development$60,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUnited States Ski Team Foundation — $208,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $170,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $150,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $115,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetIN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC — $100,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPATHWAYS HOME HEALTH AND HOSPICE — $78,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFRESH LIFELINES FOR YOUTH INC — $60,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetST LUKE'S WOOD RIVER FOUNDATION INC — $55,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetEisenhower Medical Center — $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE — $50,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMUSEUM OF THE BIBLE — $50,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPRIORITY LIVING INC — $50,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CHURCH MISSIONS — $45,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetTHE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM INC — $28,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC — $27,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHRISE UNIVERSITY INITIATIVE — $20,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPurpose Driven Connection DBA Pastor Ricks Daily Hope — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSUN VALLEY SUMMER SYMPHONY INC — $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMARINERS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSilicon Valley Community Foundation — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUSGA FOUNDATION — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds United States Ski Team Foundation
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE
  • Who funds IN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds PATHWAYS HOME HEALTH AND HOSPICE
  • Who funds FRESH LIFELINES FOR YOUTH INC
  • Who funds ST LUKE'S WOOD RIVER FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Eisenhower Medical Center
  • Who funds SUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF THE BIBLE
  • Who funds PRIORITY LIVING INC
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL CHURCH MISSIONS
  • Who funds THE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM INC
  • Who funds KQED INC
  • Who funds NORTHRISE UNIVERSITY INITIATIVE
  • Who funds Purpose Driven Connection DBA Pastor Ricks Daily Hope
  • Who funds SUN VALLEY SUMMER SYMPHONY INC
  • Who funds MARINERS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
  • Who funds Silicon Valley Community Foundation
  • Who funds USGA FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH15.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Orange County Community Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Servant Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Sue & Bob McCollum Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Sue & Bob McCollum Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Sue & Bob McCollum Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph