Skip to content

Utah · Private foundation

The Stirling Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.7M
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
44
Grants FY2025
26
Organizations funded FY2024
54%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$50,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$513,037
Organizations funded a year
5 to 26
FY2019 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
3
Total assets, FY2025
$2.6M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 54% of the organizations The Stirling Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 26% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $686k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalPhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving44$3.7M66%
FY202426$2.6M54%
FY202324$2.3M42%
FY202216$3.3M56%
FY202118$1.3M56%
FY202014$1.6M86%
FY20195$57kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

International$7.8MEducation$1.6MCrime & Legal$1.6MHealth$1.3MReligion$773kHuman Services$488kYouth Development$293kCommunity Improvement$245kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Coaxion Global Inc$221,062139%
doTERRA Healing Hands Foundation$205,11021%
Hopkin Foundation$147,450318%
Care for Life Inc$120,000124%
Utah Muslim Civic League$91,2002n/a
Welcome Hand Inc$58,2001n/a
We the World Inc$50,300112%
Seeds of Kati$50,0001n/a
Engage Now Africa Inc$16,00020%
Euroseminar Foundation$8,0762n/a
Show all 15 grantees
All grantees of The Stirling Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Coaxion Global Inc$221,062139%
doTERRA Healing Hands Foundation$205,11021%
Hopkin Foundation$147,450318%
Care for Life Inc$120,000124%
Utah Muslim Civic League$91,2002n/a
Welcome Hand Inc$58,2001n/a
We the World Inc$50,300112%
Seeds of Kati$50,0001n/a
Engage Now Africa Inc$16,00020%
Euroseminar Foundation$8,0762n/a
Kids on the Move Inc$5,00010%
Catholic Community Services of Utah$5,0001n/a
Congregation Kol Ami$5,0001n/a
A Child's Hope Foundation$1,82010%
Rwandan Community Abroad$1,0001n/a

Plus 74 recipients with no EIN on record ($14M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

The Stirling Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 8 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCoaxion Global Inc: $221,062 over 1y, 39% of budgetdoTERRA Healing Hands Foundation: $205,110 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetHopkin Foundation: $147,450 over 3y, 18% of budgetCare for Life Inc: $120,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetWe the World Inc: $50,300 over 1y, 12% of budgetEngage Now Africa Inc: $16,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetKids on the Move Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetA Child's Hope Foundation: $1,820 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Clark and Christine Ivory FoundationUT13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Clark and Christine Ivory Foundation · doTERRA Healing Hands Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Stirling Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Stirling Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Stirling Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About The Stirling Foundation

How much does The Stirling Foundation give?
The Stirling Foundation reported 44 grants totaling $3,677,576 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 5 and 26 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2024.
What does The Stirling Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2025, its largest causes are International (52%), Education (11%), Crime & Legal (10%).
Who are The Stirling Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2025: Coaxion Global Inc ($221k), doTERRA Healing Hands Foundation ($205k), Hopkin Foundation ($147k).
Does The Stirling Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 54% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Stirling Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Stirling Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Clark and Christine Ivory Foundation, doTERRA Healing Hands Foundation, National Philanthropic Trust.
Where is The Stirling Foundation based?
The Stirling Foundation is based in UT.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 89 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Stirling’s filings →

More from the funding graph