· Private foundation
The Stirling Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $38k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $244k
- $50k–250k23 grants · $2.6M
- $250k+2 grants · $843k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ELEVATE FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT | $513,037 |
| PRINCESS TAGHRID INSTITUTE | $330,000 |
| G20 INTERFAITH FORUM-G20I | $240,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $210,847 |
| INTER-RELIGIOUS COUNCIL OF ETHIOPIA | $209,000 |
| AYAR BALA-PUBLIC HUMANITARIAN FUND | $181,976 |
| EURASIA PARTNERSHIP FOUNDATION | $173,672 |
| QATAR RED CRESCENT | $150,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $138,595 |
| Individual grant recipient | $124,000 |
| TERRE SANS FRONTIERES | $122,500 |
| PUBLIC ASSOCIATION OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES ASYL-AI -SUZAK REGIONAL GOVE | $120,000 |
| BARZANI CHARITY FOUNDATION | $117,124 |
| DANGALMA DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION | $100,500 |
| IT EDUCATION ASSOCIATION (IT) | $96,068 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
US giving: 19% of grant dollars ($2.8M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 81% that went abroad ($12M) is mapped below.
Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $314k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 70% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Beyond the US: 81% of all-years giving ($12M)
22 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
How this is measured
Where the work is directed
The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.
About 14% of The Stirling Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
31 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 29 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- EFELEVATE FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT7× · 2019–2025 · $3.5M
- PTPRINCESS TAGHRID INSTITUTE5× · 2021–2025 · $1.9M
- RCRWANDA CORRECTIONAL SERVICE3× · 2022–2024 · $1.1M
Funded once
- LPLDS PHILANTHROPIESone grant, 2020 · $882k
- HCHIMMETNA CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONone grant, 2024 · $282k
- CGCoaxion Global Incone grant, 2021 · $221k · revenue -100% · 39% of their budget
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Hands of Hope African Outreach empowers vulnerable women and children in East Africa by partnering with small community-based organizations We support locally led initiatives that provide vocational training access to education healthcare…
How this is measured
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 89 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Clark and Christine Ivory Foundation · doTERRA Healing Hands Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization The Stirling Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Stirling Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Stirling Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Stirling Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Stirling’s filings →