· Private foundation
The Stewart J Rahr Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k7 grants · $170k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $580k
- $250k+7 grants · $4.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MAKE A WISH METRO NEW YORK | $1,000,000 |
| FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC | $950,000 |
| NYU LANGONE HEALTH | $666,667 |
| MELANOMA RESEARCH ALLIANCE | $500,000 |
| PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION | $420,000 |
| COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK TRUSTEES OF | $400,000 |
| NEPHCURE KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL | $250,000 |
| AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION INC | $150,000 |
| ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC | $100,000 |
| GEORGE JACKSON ACADEMY | $80,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TARAH & TEFILAH RAMAT ESHKO | $50,000 |
| NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR FURTHERANCE OF JEWISH EDUCATION | $50,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $50,000 |
| MAKE A WISH SOUTHERN FLORIDA | $50,000 |
| DANIEL'S MUSIC FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $355k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 44% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.
32 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $750k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FOFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC4× · 2020–2024 · $2.9M · revenue +127%
MELANOMA RESEARCH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION4× · 2020–2023 · $2.3M · revenue +103%- PCPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION4× · 2021–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +7%
Funded once
- TMTHE MILKEN CENTER FOR ADVANCING THE AMERICAN DREAMone grant, 2022 · $1.0M
- PCPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $1.0M
- FOFRIENDS OF THE UNITED HATZALAHone grant, 2022 · $555k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The american friends of beit issie shapiro (afobis) is a national not for profit fundraising organization with regional offices in new york city, north miami beach, fl and los angeles, ca. afobis is dedicated to supporting beit issie…
Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.
The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…
The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…
To facilitate and promote philanthropy through donor advised funds.
Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.
Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…
We fundraise in the u.s. to support, and raise awareness of, bar-ilan university in israel.
The principal and primary intent of the organization is to support kohelet policy forum (the "forum"), a jerusalem-based non-profit policy center founded in 2012, comprised of leading academics and researchers.
The fund's primary exempt mission is to solicit grants and contributions to support the educational mission of the bar-ilan university's azrieli faculty of medicine in the galilee.
The foundation is dedicated to finding a cure for parkinson's disease through an aggressively funded research agenda and ensuring the development of improved therapies for those living with parkinson's today.
Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Birthright Israel Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Jdm Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
- Who funds MELANOMA RESEARCH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
- Who funds The Curetivity Foundation ↗
- Who funds NEPHCURE KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL PROSTATE CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE MILKEN INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES BALLET INC ↗
- Who funds Chopra Foundation ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TORAH AND TEFILAH RAMAT ESHKOL INC ↗
- Who funds COLLEGIATE SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds THE MARK WAHLBERG YOUTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE DAVID FOSTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds ISRAEL RESCUE COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds GEORGE JACKSON ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds DANIEL'S MUSIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JDM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MOUNT VERNON INC ↗
- Who funds CASA OF LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds THE JUMP AND BALL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GATEWAY FOR CANCER RESEARCH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Fjc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Chubb Charitable Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · California Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Stewart J Rahr Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.