Skip to content
The Stewart and Marlene Greenebaum Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Stewart and Marlene Greenebaum Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$651k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$6.5MReligion$800kHealth$418kPublic Safety & Disaster$80kYouth Development$32kHuman Services$10kPhilanthropy$8kCivil Rights$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $114k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
  • $250k+1 grant · $400k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$5.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BETH TFILOH CONGREGATION$400,000
HIGHLAND HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$50,000
HAR SINAI OHEB SHALOM CONGREGATION$50,000
THE ASSOCIATED$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND MEDICAL SYSTEM FOUNDATION$20,750
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND MEDICAL SYSTEM FOUNDATION$20,000
BETH TFILOH CONGREGATION$18,000
ELIJAH CUMMINGS YOUTH PROGRAM IN ISRAEL$10,000
ELIJAH CUMMINGS YOUTH PROGRAM IN ISRAEL$10,000
PROJECT PNEUMA$10,000
LIFEBRIDGE HEALTH CORPORATE DEVELOPMENT$9,000
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$8,705
AMERICAN-ISRAEL DEMECRACY COALITION$5,000
THE SIGNAL 13 FOUNDATION$5,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF REUTH$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HORIZON DAY CAMP: $10k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.9M · 8 repeat orgs$151k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
7

Total granted

$7.9M
$58k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+12%

Still filing today

38%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $93k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyCrime & LegalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MCDONOGH SCHOOL INCORPORATED
    4× · 2020–2023 · $6.4M · revenue +19%
  • UO
    University of Maryland Medical System Foundation Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $258k · revenue +3%
  • LH
    LIFEBRIDGE HEALTH INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $61k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • LC
    LIVING CLASSROOMS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • CF
    CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $13k · revenue -15%
  • SD
    SUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Maryland Physicians Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
2
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
3
University of Maryland Facultyphysicians Inc

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland, school of medicine, administrative support services are provided to the physician practices of the university of maryland, including but not limited to information technology,…

Health
4
University of Maryland Family Medicine Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
5
University of Maryland Surgical Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
6
University of Maryland Oncology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
7
University of Maryland Emergency Medicine Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
8
University of Maryland Pediatric Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
9
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
10
University of Maryland Neurosurgeryassociates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Education
11
University of Maryland Otorhino-Laryngology-Head & Neck Surgery Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
12
University of Maryland Eye Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of the Mid-Atlantic Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MCDONOGH SCHOOL INCORPORATED: $6,435,000 · EducationMCDONOGH SCHOOL INCORPORATEDUniversity of Maryland Medical System Foundation Inc: $258,420 · EducationBETH TFILOH CONGREGATION: $500,000 · OtherBETH TFILOH CONGR…HAR SINAI - OHEB SHALOM CONGREGATION INC: $300,000 · OtherHAR SINAI - OHEB …THE ASSOCIATED: $275,000 · OtherTHE ASSOCIATEDFrank J Battaglia Signal 13 Foundation Inc: $80,000 · OtherFrank J Battaglia…+4 more: $61,657 · OtherLIFEBRIDGE HEALTH INC: $60,500 · HealthTHE HIGHLAND FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · HealthCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $12,500 · HealthLEVINDALE HEBREW GERIATRIC CENTER AND HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 · HealthELIJAH CUMMINGS YOUTH PROGRAM IN ISRAEL INC: $20,000 · InternationalPROJECT PNEUMA INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentMISSIONFIT: $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentSUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesAMERICA ISRAEL DEMOCRACY COALITION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyBALTIMORE CIVIC FUND INC: $2,500 · PhilanthropyERIN MICHELE LEVITAS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Crime & Legal
Education$6,693,420Other$1,216,657Health$128,000International$20,000Youth Development$12,000Human Services$10,000Philanthropy$7,500Crime & Legal$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMCDONOGH SCHOOL INCORPORATED: $6,435,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetUniversity of Maryland Medical System Foundation Inc: $258,420 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetFrank J Battaglia Signal 13 Foundation Inc: $80,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetLIFEBRIDGE HEALTH INC: $60,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HIGHLAND FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetELIJAH CUMMINGS YOUTH PROGRAM IN ISRAEL INC: $20,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLEVINDALE HEBREW GERIATRIC CENTER AND HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICA ISRAEL DEMOCRACY COALITION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE MID-ATLANTIC INC: $2,952 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBALTIMORE CIVIC FUND INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISSIONFIT: $2,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetERIN MICHELE LEVITAS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Harry and Jeanett…David & Barbara B Hir…Associated Jewish Cha…T Rowe Price Program …Benno and Elayne Hurw…The Philip and Harrie…The Aaron & Lillie St…Crane Family Foundati…France-Merrick Founda…Brown Advisory Charit…The Abell Foundation …Baltimore Community F…
The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation IncMD17.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · David & Barbara B Hirschhorn Foundation Inc · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Benno and Elayne Hurwitz Family Foundation Inc · The Philip and Harriet Klein Foundation Inc · The Aaron & Lillie Straus Fdn Inc 9830002 · Crane Family Foundation Inc · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · Brown Advisory Charitable Foundation Inc · The Abell Foundation Inc · Baltimore Community Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Stewart and Marlene Greenebaum Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Stewart and Marlene Greenebaum Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Lifebridge Health Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Levindale Hebrew Geriatric Center and Hospital Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Mcdonogh School Incorporated: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Stewart and Marlene Greenebaum Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home