Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Statesman Foundation Inc

To provide support for charities, education, arts, and science.

$140k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Human Services$147kEducation$75kHealth$70kYouth Development$46kReligion$31kPublic Safety & Disaster$27kHousing & Shelter$25kFood & Nutrition$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 8 grants below total $107,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $140,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $33,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $95k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$63k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALSTROM SYNDROME INTERNATIONAL$25,000
DOMINICAN CONVENT OF OUR LADY OF THE ROSARY$25,000
COVENANT HOUSE NEW YORK$15,000
YOUNG LIFE MISSOULA$10,000
CHARITYSMITH NONPROFIT FOUNDATION$10,000
MISSOULA FAMILY YMCA$10,000
NORTH SHORE CHILD & FAMILY GUIDANCE ASSOCIATION INC$6,500
AURORA WOMEN AND GIRLS FOUNDATION$5,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $139k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 63% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MOUNTAIN HOME MONTANA: $10k → 9%NORTH SHORE CHILD & FAMILY GUIDANCE ASSOCIATION INC: $7k → 6%ALSTROM SYNDROME INTERNATIONAL: $25k → 10%HOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD: $10k → 14%COVENANT HOUSE: $30k → 16%ALSTROM SYNDROME INTERNATIONAL: $8k → 8%MISSOULA FAMILY YMCA: $10k → 9%COVENANT HOUSE NEW YORK: $15k → 17%HOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD: $8k → 14%CORNERSTONE FAMILY PROGRAMS: $8k → 4%GREATER MISSOULA FAMILY YMCA: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
IL
NY
IA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 25% of The Statesman Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 46% of the giving stays in NY; read by stated purpose it is 28% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Statesman Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.3% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$222k · 6 repeat orgs$262k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
17

Total granted

$222k
$225k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+34%

Still filing today

67%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $37k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationInternationalReligionFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AS
    Alstrom Syndrome International
    2× · 2023–2024 · $33k · revenue +1%
  • HO
    House of the Good Shepherd
    2× · 2017–2018 · $18k · revenue +76%
  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $16k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • CH
    COVENANT HOUSE NEW JERSEY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $30k · revenue +48%
  • HE
    HARLEM EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES FUND INC
    one grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue -23%
  • BT
    BRIDGE TRANSCENDS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $26k · revenue +946% · 93% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Covenant House Washington Dc

Covenant house washington, dc ("chw") provides shelter, crisis care, community services, and outreach services to youth in the washington dc area.

Human Services
2
Covenant House Georgia Inc

Covenant house georgia provides shelters, protects and advocates on behalf of homeless, trafficked, runaway and sexually exploited youth.

3
Covenant House New Orleans

Covenant house new orleans (the organization) is a not-for-profit organization affiliated with 34 similar organizations across five countries, all of which are affiliates of covenant house international (parent affiliate) and share a…

Human Services
4
Under 21

Since 1972, under 21, d.b.a. covenant house new york (chny) has been working with one of new york city's most vulnerable populations - youth experiencing homelessness, age 16-24, and their dependent children. chny provides young people…

Human Services
5
Covenant House Michigan

Covenant house michigan is a sanctuary for homeless and at-risk young people, ages 18-24 who have nowhere to go. it is our mission to serve these children with respect and love.covenant house michigan builds bridges to hope for young…

Human Services
6
Ch Pennsylvania Under - 21

Our mission is to serve children and youth facing homelessness and human trafficking, and to protect and safeguard all children. we provide trauma-informed interventions for youth who are in need.covenant house pennsylvania (chpa) remains…

Housing & Shelter
7
Covenant House California

Covenant house is dedicated to serving all of god's children with absolute respect and unconditional love to help youth experiencing homelessness and to protect and safeguard all youth in need.

Human Services
8
Covenant House Illinois Inc

In 34 cities across five countries, covenant house builds bridges to hope for young people facing homelessness and survivors of human trafficking. we meet their immediate needs for food, clothing, protection, and medical and mental health…

Human Services
9
Urban Peak Denver

Urban peak helps youth experiencing homelessness and youth at risk of becoming homeless overcome real life challenges by providing essential services and a supportive community, empowering them to become self-sufficient adults.

Housing & Shelter
10
Covenant House Missouri

Covenant house missouri serves young people age 16-24 who are living without homes and/or victims of human trafficking and protect and safeguard all youth with absolute respect and unconditional love.

Human Services
11
Elevate Youth Services Inc

Elevate's mission is to promote safety, competence, and confidence as youth create their path through adolescence and into adulthood.elevate provides a wide range of innovative and effective programs that empower and enrich the lives of…

Human Services
12
Association House of Chicago

Association house's mission is to advance each person's full participation in the life of their families, communities, and society. since 1899, we have served a vibrant, multicultural community. we used a trauma informed, culturally…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cornerstone Family Programs and the most unlike its peers is Ajiri Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCancer Support OrganizationsChristian Missionary Organi…Ymca Community CentersIndependent K-8 SchoolsVeteran Support ServicesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Homeless Services & ShelterChild and Family Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%17%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%35%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%6%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr13%20%35–55yr16%47%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%1/27
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,538

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
16/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DOMINICAN CONVENT OF OUR LADY OF THE ROSARY — $106,500 · OtherDOMINICAN CONVENT OF OUR LADY OF THE ROSARYHARLEM EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES FUND INC — $30,000 · OtherHARLEM EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES FUND INCST MARGARET MARY CHURCH — $29,500 · OtherST MARGARET MARY CHURCHIN MEMORY OF — $25,000 · OtherIN MEMORY OFPreston High School — $10,000 · OtherHOMELESS SOLUTIONS INC — $10,000 · Other+3 more — $18,500 · Other+3 moreAlstrom Syndrome International — $32,500 · Human ServicesAlstrom Syndrome InternationalCOVENANT HOUSE NEW JERSEY INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE NEW JERSEY INCGREATER MISSOULA FAMILY YMCA — $20,000 · Human ServicesGREATER MISSOULA FAMILY YMCAHouse of the Good Shepherd — $17,500 · Human ServicesHouse of the Good ShepherdCOVENANT HOUSE — $15,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSEMOUNTAIN HOME MONTANA INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesMOUNTAIN HOME MONTANA INCCORNERSTONE FAMILY PROGRAMS — $7,500 · Human ServicesCORNERSTONE FAMILY PROGRAMSNORTH SHORE CHILD & FAMILY GUIDANCE ASSOCIATION INC — $6,500 · Human ServicesBRIDGE TRANSCENDS INC — $26,000 · EducationBRIDGE TRA…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $7,500 · EducationSTEPHEN SI…TRINITY COLLEGE — $6,000 · EducationTRINITY CO…AJIRI FOUNDATION — $5,000 · EducationAJIRI FOUN…NEW YORK COMMON PANTRY — $25,000 · Food & NutritionJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NEW JERSEY — $7,500 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC — $6,000 · InternationalRAZOM INC — $6,000 · InternationalYOUNG LIFE — $16,000 · Youth DevelopmentCHARITYSMITH NONPROFIT FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$229,500Human Services$139,000Education$44,500Food & Nutrition$25,000International$19,500Youth Development$16,000Philanthropy$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAlstrom Syndrome International — $32,500 over 2y, 9.7% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE NEW JERSEY INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHARLEM EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES FUND INC — $30,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetBRIDGE TRANSCENDS INC — $26,000 over 1y, 93% of budgetNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER MISSOULA FAMILY YMCA — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHouse of the Good Shepherd — $17,500 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $16,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNTAIN HOME MONTANA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHARITYSMITH NONPROFIT FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPreston High School — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOMELESS SOLUTIONS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NEW JERSEY — $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCORNERSTONE FAMILY PROGRAMS — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE CHILD & FAMILY GUIDANCE ASSOCIATION INC — $6,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITY COLLEGE — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAZOM INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAURORA WOMEN AND GIRLS FOUNDATION INC — $5,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMISSOULA INTERFAITH COLLABORATIVE — $5,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetAJIRI FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 9.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Chubb Charitable FoundationPA15.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Chubb Charitable Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Statesman Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 3%
  • Covenant House New Jersey Inc34% of income from government
  • Homeless Solutions Inc6% of income from government
  • Cornerstone Family Programs3% of income from government
  • Trinity College0% of income from government
  • Aurora Women and Girls Foundation Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Statesman Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Statesman Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph