Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Spillane Charitable Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$52k
Granted FY2026still arriving
10
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$210kHealth$38kHuman Services$25kFood & Nutrition$19kPhilanthropy$9kArts & Culture$7kRecreation & Sports$5kYouth Development$3kOther$0
02FY2026 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k8 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE FUND FOR SAINT MARY'S SCHOOL$10,000
PARTNERS IN CHARITY$10,000
DEXTER SOUTHFIELD SCHOOL$5,000
SAINT JOHNS HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
MERCY CENTRE-CATHOLIC CHARITRIES$5,000
TABOR ACADEMY$5,000
HYANNIS YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION$5,000
DEDHAM COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL$5,000
MUSEUM OF WORCESTER$1,500
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%MCAULEY NAZARETH HOME FOR BOYS INC: $5k → 11%MCAULEY NAZARETH HOME FOR BOYS INC: $5k → 11%MCAULEY NAZARETH HOME FOR BOYS INC: $3k → 11%MCAULEY NAZARETH HOME FOR BOYS INC: $3k → 11%VISITATION HOUSE INC: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$371k · 21 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +5% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2026, 14 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
4

Total granted

$371k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
0%

Still filing today

57%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
EducationHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SISTERS OF SAINT ANN INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $82k · revenue +5%
  • AU
    ASSUMPTION UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2020–2023 · $35k · revenue +9%
  • PP
    PROBLEM PREGNANCY OF WORCESTER INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $33k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • UM
    UMASS MEMORIAL HEALTH-QUINLAN BREAST CANCER ENDOWMENT FUND
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • CT
    CHRIST THE KING PARISH
    one grant, 2025 · $3k
  • SP
    SAINT PAUL DIOCESAN JRSR HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2025 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
2
Nichols College

Nichols college strives to develop tomorrow's leaders through a dynamic, career-focused business education. the college transforms students into successful graduates who respond to challenges, are eager for responsibility, and assume…

Education
3
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
4
Worcester Academy

Worcester academy exists to instill in its students the desire to learn throughout life, to engage passionately with the world around them, and to be honorable persons of strong and resourceful character.

Education
5
Dean College

Dean college is a private, residential new england college grounded in a culture and tradition that all students deserve the opportunity to discover and exceed their greatest aspirations. a personal and transformative community since 1865,…

Education
6
New England Lawboston

New england law/boston dedicates itself to preparing students to be successful lawyers and leaders in the public and private sectors through integrated practical, theoretical and ethical education of the highest caliber and to contributing…

Education
7
Hampshire Country School

Hampshire country school is a place of possibilities for high-ability, neurodiverse students enrolling in later elementary or middle school who have not found success in traditional educational environments. hampshire country school offers…

—
8
Mcphs University

Mcphs university prepares students for careers in health care through teaching, scholarship, research, professional service and community engagement.

Education
9
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
10
The Trustees of the Cushing Academy

Cushing academy, founded as a coeducational boarding school in 1865, exists for students, their academic growth and their personal development. we are dedicated to educating the mind, shaping the character, and nurturing the creativity of…

Education
11
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
12
Emmanuel College

Emmanuel college is a coed, residential catholic liberal arts and sciences college with 2,112 undergraduate and graduate students.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dexter Southfield Inc; the most unlike its peers is Visitation House Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE SISTERS OF SAINT ANN INC: $82,000 · EducationTHE SISTERS OF SAINT ANN INCASSUMPTION UNIVERSITY: $35,000 · EducationASSUMPTION UNIVERSITYDEXTER SOUTHFIELD INC: $10,000 · EducationDEXTER SOUTHFIELD INCCATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · EducationCATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INCTABOR ACADEMY: $10,000 · EducationTABOR ACADEMYDEDHAM COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $10,000 · EducationDEDHAM COUNTRY DAY SCHOOLDIOCESE OF WORCESTER: $31,500 · OtherDIOCESE OF WORCESTERTHE HOLY CROSS FUND: $30,000 · OtherTHE HOLY CROSS FUNDTHE FUND FOR SAINT MARY'S SCHOOL: $20,000 · OtherTHE FUND FOR SAINT MARY'S SCHOOLSAINT JOHN'S CHURCH FOOD FOR THE POOR PROGRAM: $18,500 · OtherSAINT JOHN'S CHURCH FOOD FOR THE POOR PROGRAMNATIVITY SCHOOL OF WORCESTER INC: $15,000 · OtherNATIVITY SCHOOL OF WORCESTER INCST JOHNS HIGH SCHOOL: $10,000 · OtherST JOHNS HIGH SCHOOLCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF WORCESTER COUNTY: $7,500 · Other+8 more: $24,000 · Other+8 morePROBLEM PREGNANCY OF WORCESTER INC: $33,000 · HealthPROBLEM P…MCAULEY NAZARETH INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesVISITATION HOUSE INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesHYANNIS YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $9,500 · Recreation & SportsUMASS CHAN MEDICAL SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC: $9,000 · PhilanthropyOLD STURBRIDGE INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureHEART OF NEW ENGLAND COUNCIL BSA INC: $3,000 · Youth Development
Education$157,000Other$156,500Health$33,000Human Services$17,500Recreation & Sports$9,500Philanthropy$9,000Arts & Culture$5,000Youth Development$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE SISTERS OF SAINT ANN INC: $82,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetASSUMPTION UNIVERSITY: $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPROBLEM PREGNANCY OF WORCESTER INC: $33,000 over 6y, 4.3% of budgetMCAULEY NAZARETH INC: $15,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNATIVITY SCHOOL OF WORCESTER INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetDEXTER SOUTHFIELD INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTABOR ACADEMY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDEDHAM COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHYANNIS YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $9,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetOLD STURBRIDGE INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEART OF NEW ENGLAND COUNCIL BSA INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVISITATION HOUSE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE SISTERS OF SAINT ANN INC ↗
  • Who funds ASSUMPTION UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PROBLEM PREGNANCY OF WORCESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MCAULEY NAZARETH INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIVITY SCHOOL OF WORCESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds DEXTER SOUTHFIELD INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TABOR ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds DEDHAM COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds HYANNIS YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OLD STURBRIDGE INC ↗
  • Who funds HEART OF NEW ENGLAND COUNCIL BSA INC ↗
  • Who funds VISITATION HOUSE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

David R Grenon Family FoundationMA17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: David R Grenon Family Foundation · Greater Worcester Community Foundation Inc · Lauring Charitable Foundation · Coghlin Family Foundation · The George I Alden Trust · AbbVie Foundation · Fidelity Foundation · Anthony-Arthur Foundation Inc · Carroll Charitable Foundation · The Camosse Family Foundation Inc · The Fletcher Foundation · Fallon Community Health Plan Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Spillane Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Spillane Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Mcauley Nazareth Inc: 74% of income from government
  • Old Sturbridge Inc: 4% of income from government
  • The Sisters of Saint Ann Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Assumption University: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Spillane’s filings →

More from the funding graph