Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Spillane Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$58k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$210kHealth$38kHuman Services$25kFood & Nutrition$19kPhilanthropy$9kArts & Culture$7kRecreation & Sports$5kYouth Development$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$992k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PARTNERS IN CHARITY$5,000
PROBLEM PREGNANCY OF WORCESTER$5,000
DEDHAM COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL$5,000
ANNA MARIA COLLEGE$5,000
THE FUND FOR SAINT MARY'S SCHOOL$5,000
UMASS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$5,000
DEXTER SOUTHFIELD SCHOOL$5,000
SAINT JOHNS HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
TABOR ACADEMY$5,000
SAINT JOHN'S CHURCH FOOD FOR THE POOR PROGRAM$2,500
CHRIST THE KING PARISH$2,500
THE HOLY CROSS FUND$2,500
SAINT PAUL DIOCESAN JRSR HIGH SCHOOL$2,500
HYANNIS YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION$2,500
DIOCESE OF WORCESTER$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%MCAULEY NAZARETH HOME FOR BOYS INC: $5k → 11%MCAULEY NAZARETH HOME FOR BOYS INC: $5k → 11%MCAULEY NAZARETH HOME FOR BOYS INC: $3k → 11%MCAULEY NAZARETH HOME FOR BOYS INC: $3k → 11%VISITATION HOUSE INC: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$306k · 17 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +9% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
2

Total granted

$306k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
0%

Still filing today

53%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SISTERS OF SAINT ANN INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $82k · revenue +5%
  • AU
    ASSUMPTION UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2020–2023 · $35k · revenue +9%
  • PP
    PROBLEM PREGNANCY OF WORCESTER INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $33k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • UM
    UMASS MEMORIAL HEALTH-QUINLAN BREAST CANCER ENDOWMENT FUND
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • VH
    VISITATION HOUSE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
2
Nichols College

Nichols college strives to develop tomorrow's leaders through a dynamic, career-focused business education. the college transforms students into successful graduates who respond to challenges, are eager for responsibility, and assume…

Education
3
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
4
Worcester Academy

Worcester academy exists to instill in its students the desire to learn throughout life, to engage passionately with the world around them, and to be honorable persons of strong and resourceful character.

Education
5
Dean College

Dean college is a private, residential new england college grounded in a culture and tradition that all students deserve the opportunity to discover and exceed their greatest aspirations. a personal and transformative community since 1865,…

Education
6
New England Lawboston

New england law/boston dedicates itself to preparing students to be successful lawyers and leaders in the public and private sectors through integrated practical, theoretical and ethical education of the highest caliber and to contributing…

Education
7
Hampshire Country School

Hampshire country school is a place of possibilities for high-ability, neurodiverse students enrolling in later elementary or middle school who have not found success in traditional educational environments. hampshire country school offers…

8
Mcphs University

Mcphs university prepares students for careers in health care through teaching, scholarship, research, professional service and community engagement.

Education
9
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

10
The Trustees of the Cushing Academy

Cushing academy, founded as a coeducational boarding school in 1865, exists for students, their academic growth and their personal development. we are dedicated to educating the mind, shaping the character, and nurturing the creativity of…

Education
11
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
12
Emmanuel College

Emmanuel college is a coed, residential catholic liberal arts and sciences college with 2,112 undergraduate and graduate students.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dexter Southfield Inc and the most unlike its peers is Visitation House Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE SISTERS OF SAINT ANN INC — $82,000 · EducationTHE SISTERS OF SAINT ANN INCASSUMPTION UNIVERSITY — $35,000 · EducationASSUMPTION UNIVERSITYCATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · EducationCATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INCTABOR ACADEMY — $5,000 · EducationDEXTER SOUTHFIELD INC — $5,000 · EducationDEDHAM COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL — $5,000 · EducationTHE HOLY CROSS FUND — $30,000 · OtherTHE HOLY CROSS FUNDDIOCESE OF WORCESTER — $21,500 · OtherDIOCESE OF WORCESTERSAINT JOHN'S CHURCH FOOD FOR THE POOR PROGRAM — $18,500 · OtherSAINT JOHN'S CHURCH FOOD FOR THE POOR PRO…NATIVITY SCHOOL OF WORCESTER INC — $15,000 · OtherNATIVITY SCHOOL OF WORCESTER INCTHE FUND FOR SAINT MARY'S SCHOOL — $10,000 · OtherTHE FUND FOR SAINT MARY'S SCHOOLCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF WORCESTER COUNTY — $7,500 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF WORCESTER COUNTYVENERINI ACADEMY INC — $5,000 · OtherUMASS MEMORIAL HEALTH-QUINLAN BREAST CANCER ENDOWMENT FUND — $5,000 · OtherST JOHNS HIGH SCHOOL — $5,000 · Other+3 more — $7,000 · Other+3 morePROBLEM PREGNANCY OF WORCESTER INC — $33,000 · HealthPROBLEM PRE…MCAULEY NAZARETH INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesVISITATION HOUSE INC — $2,500 · Human ServicesUMASS CHAN MEDICAL SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC — $9,000 · PhilanthropyOLD STURBRIDGE INC — $5,000 · Arts & CultureHYANNIS YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION INC — $4,500 · Recreation & SportsHEART OF NEW ENGLAND COUNCIL BSA INC — $3,000 · Youth Development
Education$142,000Other$124,500Health$33,000Human Services$17,500Philanthropy$9,000Arts & Culture$5,000Recreation & Sports$4,500Youth Development$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE SISTERS OF SAINT ANN INC — $82,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetASSUMPTION UNIVERSITY — $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPROBLEM PREGNANCY OF WORCESTER INC — $33,000 over 6y, 4.3% of budgetMCAULEY NAZARETH INC — $15,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNATIVITY SCHOOL OF WORCESTER INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOLD STURBRIDGE INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTABOR ACADEMY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDEXTER SOUTHFIELD INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDEDHAM COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHYANNIS YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION INC — $4,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHEART OF NEW ENGLAND COUNCIL BSA INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVISITATION HOUSE INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE SISTERS OF SAINT ANN INC
  • Who funds ASSUMPTION UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds PROBLEM PREGNANCY OF WORCESTER INC
  • Who funds MCAULEY NAZARETH INC
  • Who funds NATIVITY SCHOOL OF WORCESTER INC
  • Who funds CATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds OLD STURBRIDGE INC
  • Who funds TABOR ACADEMY
  • Who funds DEXTER SOUTHFIELD INC
  • Who funds DEDHAM COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL
  • Who funds HYANNIS YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds HEART OF NEW ENGLAND COUNCIL BSA INC
  • Who funds VISITATION HOUSE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

David R Grenon Family FoundationMA17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: David R Grenon Family Foundation · Greater Worcester Community Foundation Inc · Lauring Charitable Foundation · Coghlin Family Foundation · The George I Alden Trust · AbbVie Foundation · Fidelity Foundation · Anthony-Arthur Foundation Inc · Carroll Charitable Foundation · The Camosse Family Foundation Inc · The Fletcher Foundation · Fallon Community Health Plan Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Spillane Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 90%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • Mcauley Nazareth Inc74% of income from government
  • Old Sturbridge Inc4% of income from government
  • The Sisters of Saint Ann Inc2% of income from government
  • Assumption University0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph