· Private foundation
The Fletcher Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k22 grants · $101k
- $10k–50k27 grants · $432k
- $50k–250k13 grants · $1.4M
- $250k+4 grants · $1.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ECOTARIUM | $500,000 |
| REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL INC | $410,000 |
| QUINSIGAMOND COMMUNITY COLLEGE | $253,000 |
| CREATIVE HUB WORCESTER | $250,000 |
| ANNA MARIA COLLEGE | $150,000 |
| NEW ENGLAND BOTANIC GARDEN AT TOWER HILL | $150,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $150,000 |
| HANOVER THEATRE FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS | $150,000 |
| GREATER WORCESTER LAND TRUST | $105,000 |
| WORCESTER ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE | $103,000 |
| WORCESTER RISE FOR HEALTH | $100,000 |
| WORCESTER CENTER FOR CRAFTS | $100,000 |
| WORCESTER PUBLIC MARKET | $100,000 |
| MASSACHUSETTS BIOMEDICAL INITATIVES | $75,000 |
| JOY OF MUSIC PROGRAM INC | $68,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $980k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.
84 repeat relationships — 35 still active in FY2024, 49 since wound down; 31 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.6M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
WORCESTER ART MUSEUM4× · 2018–2022 · $925k · revenue +130%- MWMUSIC WORCESTER INC5× · 2018–2024 · $762k · revenue +38% · 38% of their budget
- WPWORCESTER PUBLIC MARKET INC4× · 2018–2024 · $650k · revenue +259% · 100% of their budget
Funded once
- WPWORCESTER PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2019 · $600k · revenue -58% · 62% of their budget
- UMUMASS MEMORIAL HEALTH CARE INCone grant, 2021 · $450k
- PWPRESERVATION WORCESTER INCone grant, 2022 · $205k · revenue -44%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The worcester business development corporation (wbdc) is a private, non- profit business organization with a public purpose mission to serve as an innovation and leading force in the economic development of the city of worcester and the…
The organization is dedicated to being the leading business organization in central massachusetts by providing valuable membership services and programs and events to its members and in advancing and advocating on behalf of economic…
Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…
Worcester Community Housing Resources' mission is to help create and preserve affordable housing and to initiate and support neighborhood revitalization in the greater Worcester area. Since 1994 we have proven ourselves to be a successful…
To develop, implement, manage, operate, enhance and promote the general welfare of the people within the designated downtown worcester business improvement district (the district), through activities, programs, and services to include but…
To aid, encourage, advise, and correlate activities dedicated to the promotion of the arts in worcester county, as may be feasible; to integrate such activities into the total life of the community served by the council.
Walkmassachusetts makes walking safer and easier in massachusetts to encourage better health, a cleaner environment and vibrant communities.
The organization's vision is to fuel inclusion, voice, and opportunity for all. to support its charitable mission of working with individuals and community partners to inspire economic and educational equity through social change. wam ucc…
Aids project worcester is a nonprofit organization in central massachusetts dedicated to ending the hiv/aids pandemic and fostering wellness through service, advocacy, prevention, education, and collaborative initiatives. we empower and…
Medical education and medical ethics
Provision of quality education and child care programs and services.
The mission of the cambridge chamber of commerce is to make cambridge a better place in which to live, to work, to do business, to visit and to study.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Worcester Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Willard House & Clock Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
122 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 122 of the 218 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WORCESTER ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds MUSIC WORCESTER INC ↗
- Who funds WORCESTER PUBLIC MARKET INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER WORCESTER LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds WORCESTER NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds WORCESTER PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
- Who funds WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds GREATER WORCESTER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds JOY OF MUSIC PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds CREATIVE HUB WORCESTER ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF CLARK UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds YWCA CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
- Who funds WORCESTER YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WORCESTER HISTORICAL MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds PRESERVATION WORCESTER INC ↗
- Who funds GUILD OF SAINT AGNES OF WORCESTER ↗
- Who funds WORCESTER ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds MAIN SOUTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
- Who funds THE WORCESTER CENTER FOR CRAFTS INC ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS ↗
- Who funds THE SISTERS OF SAINT ANN INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY HEALTH CENTER OF WORCESTERINC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HARVEST PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds DISMAS HOUSE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Stoddard Charitable Trust · Greater Worcester Community Foundation Inc · The Fred Harris Daniels Foundation · Ruth H & Warren a Ellsworth Foundation · Webster Five Foundation Inc · The George I Alden Trust · Schwartz Charitable Foundation · Wyman Gordon · United Way of Central Massachusetts Inc · Coghlin Services Fund · Reliant Foundation Inc · Mildred H McEvoy Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Fletcher Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Centro Las Americas Inc — 91% of income from government
- Mcauley Nazareth Inc — 74% of income from government
- Advocates Inc — 66% of income from government
- Worcester Youth Center Inc — 64% of income from government
- Guild of Saint Agnes of Worcester — 60% of income from government
- Veterans Inc — 58% of income from government
- Senior Connections Inc — 52% of income from government
- Pernet Family Health Service Inc — 52% of income from government
- Open Sky Community Services Inc — 48% of income from government
- Easter Seals Massachusetts Inc — 45% of income from government
- Family Health Center of Worcesterinc — 39% of income from government
- Audio Journal Incorporated — 35% of income from government
- Straight Ahead Ministries Inc — 27% of income from government
- Bridge of Faith Youth Centerinc — 22% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- South Middlesex Opportunity Council Inc — 18% of income from government
- Community Harvest Project Inc — 18% of income from government
- Rise Above Foundation Inc — 14% of income from government
- Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
- Edward Street Child Services Inc — 12% of income from government
- Wcuw Inc — 12% of income from government
- Worcester Roots Project — 12% of income from government
- Edward M Kennedy Community Health Center Inc — 10% of income from government
- Preservation Worcester Inc — 10% of income from government
- Food Link Inc — 9% of income from government
- Worcester County 4-H Center Inc — 9% of income from government
- Worcester Polytechnic Institute — 8% of income from government
- Worcester Natural History Society Inc — 8% of income from government
- Worcester Community Action Council Inc — 8% of income from government
- Friendly House Inc — 8% of income from government
- Music Worcester Inc — 7% of income from government
- Massachusetts Symphony Orchestra Inc — 7% of income from government
- American Antiquarian Society — 7% of income from government
- Regional Environmental Council Inc — 6% of income from government
- Community Legal Aid Inc — 5% of income from government
- Worcester Chamber Music Society Inc — 5% of income from government
- Worcester Historical Museum — 5% of income from government
- Old Sturbridge Inc — 4% of income from government
- Trustees of Clark University — 2% of income from government
- Artsworcester Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Sisters of Saint Ann Inc — 2% of income from government
- Entrepreneurship for All Inc — 2% of income from government
- Jeremiah's Inn Inc — 2% of income from government
- Fitchburg Art Museum — 2% of income from government
- Boys and Girls Club of Worcester Inc — 2% of income from government
- Wicn Public Radio Inc — 1% of income from government
- Joy of Music Program Inc — 1% of income from government
- Appalachian Mountain Club — 1% of income from government
- Neads Inc — 1% of income from government
- Worcester Common Ground Inc — 1% of income from government
- Worcester Art Museum — 1% of income from government
- Worcester County Food Bank Inc — 1% of income from government
- Greater Worcester Community Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
- The Bottom Line Inc — 0% of income from government
- Creative Hub Worcester — 0% of income from government
- Williams College — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Fletcher Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Fletcher Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.