Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Smalling Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$4k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$8kHealth$7kHuman Services$5kInternational$4kEnvironment$2kArts & Culture$1kRecreation & Sports$1kPublic Benefit$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$250
Median grant
5
States reached
$12k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Turning Point USA$1,000
Samaritan's Purse$1,000
Tunnel 2 Towers$500
Individual grant recipient$500
To Be Like Me - Tolleson Family Act$250
Friends of Morgantina$200
Individual grant recipient$103
Defenders of Freedom$100
Doctors Without Borders$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Defenders of Freedom: $100 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
CA
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NC
DC
HI
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$26k · 25 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
7

Total granted

$26k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+60%

Still filing today

48%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationEnvironmentInternationalRecreation & SportsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $4k · revenue ×12
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2k · revenue +98%
  • CV
    Conejo Valley Multisport Masters
    4× · 2017–2020 · $1k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • FO
    Friends of Hawaii VNP
    one grant, 2018 · $500
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $314 · revenue +16%
  • SB
    SANTA BARBARA ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $200 · revenue +64%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Society for Neuroscience

Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…

Health
2
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
3
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
4
Society for Vascular Surgery

To improve the prevention, diagnosis, and management of patients withvascular disease by promoting clinical and basic research; providingcontinuing education; developing post-graduate training; advocating onbehalf of members; promoting the…

—
5
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
6
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
7
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
8
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
9
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
10
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
11
The Genetics Society of America in

Gsa serves an international community of scientists who use genetics to make new discoveries and improve lives. we advance biological research by supporting professional development of scientists, by communicating advances and fostering…

—
12
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Conejo Valley Multisport Masters. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Reagan Foundation: $2,445 · OtherThe Reagan FoundationIndividual grant recipient: $2,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTo Be Like Me - Tolleson Family Act: $1,750 · OtherTo Be Like Me - Tolleson Family ActIndividual grant recipient: $1,025 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTURNING POINT USA INC: $1,000 · OtherTURNING POINT USA INCGFFN Scholarship Fund: $1,000 · OtherGFFN Scholarship FundRonald McDonald Charities: $830 · OtherDisabled American Veterans: $700 · OtherNavy Marine Corp Relief: $600 · OtherRichard S Fusco Foundation: $600 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $600 · Other+16 more: $3,933 · Other+16 moreSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $4,150 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUN…FRIENDS OF THE THOUSAND OAKS LIBRARY: $500 · EducationFRIENDS OF THE THO…NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $1,300 · HealthNATIONAL …AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $450 · HealthAMYOTROPH…CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $450 · HealthCYSTIC FI…American Heart Association Inc: $314 · HealthAmerican …SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $2,000 · ReligionMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,500 · InternationalConejo Valley Multisport Masters: $1,250 · Recreation & SportsHAWAII TROPICAL BOTANICAL GARDEN: $435 · EnvironmentDALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC: $341 · Environment
Other$16,583Education$4,650Health$2,514Religion$2,000International$1,500Recreation & Sports$1,250Environment$776

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $4,150 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $1,300 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetConejo Valley Multisport Masters: $1,250 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDisabled American Veterans: $700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE THOUSAND OAKS LIBRARY: $500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKONA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $450 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII TROPICAL BOTANICAL GARDEN: $435 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC: $341 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $314 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $240 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA BARBARA ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Conejo Valley Multisport Masters ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Disabled American Veterans ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE THOUSAND OAKS LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds KONA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN ↗
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII TROPICAL BOTANICAL GARDEN ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds SANTA BARBARA ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Defenders of Freedom ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Smalling Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Smalling Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Smalling Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph