Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Smalling Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$4k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$8kHealth$7kHuman Services$5kInternational$4kEnvironment$2kArts & Culture$1kRecreation & Sports$1kPublic Benefit$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$250
Median grant
5
States reached
$12k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Turning Point USA$1,000
Samaritan's Purse$1,000
Tunnel 2 Towers$500
Individual grant recipient$500
To Be Like Me - Tolleson Family Act$250
Friends of Morgantina$200
Individual grant recipient$103
Doctors Without Borders$100
Defenders of Freedom$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Defenders of Freedom: $100 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
CA
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NC
DC
HI
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$26k · 25 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
7

Total granted

$26k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+60%

Still filing today

48%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationEnvironmentInternationalRecreation & SportsArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $4k · revenue ×12
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2k · revenue +98%
  • CV
    Conejo Valley Multisport Masters
    4× · 2017–2020 · $1k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • FO
    Friends of Hawaii VNP
    one grant, 2018 · $500
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $314 · revenue +16%
  • WK
    Western Kentucky Relief Fund
    one grant, 2021 · $200

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Society for Neuroscience

Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…

Health
2
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
3
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
4
Society for Vascular Surgery

To improve the prevention, diagnosis, and management of patients withvascular disease by promoting clinical and basic research; providingcontinuing education; developing post-graduate training; advocating onbehalf of members; promoting the…

5
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
6
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

7
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
8
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
9
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
10
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
11
The Genetics Society of America in

Gsa serves an international community of scientists who use genetics to make new discoveries and improve lives. we advance biological research by supporting professional development of scientists, by communicating advances and fostering…

12
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc and the most unlike its peers is Conejo Valley Multisport Masters. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr16%10%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr16%38%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr16%28%20–35yr13%29%35–55yr16%23%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/21
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,544

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

The Reagan Foundation — $2,445 · OtherThe Reagan FoundationIndividual grant recipient — $2,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTo Be Like Me - Tolleson Family Act — $1,750 · OtherTo Be Like Me - Tolleson Family ActIndividual grant recipient — $1,025 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGFFN Scholarship Fund — $1,000 · OtherGFFN Scholarship FundTURNING POINT USA INC — $1,000 · OtherTURNING POINT USA INCRonald McDonald Charities — $830 · OtherDisabled American Veterans — $700 · OtherNavy Marine Corp Relief — $600 · OtherRichard S Fusco Foundation — $600 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $600 · Other+16 more — $3,933 · Other+16 moreSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $4,150 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUN…FRIENDS OF THE THOUSAND OAKS LIBRARY — $500 · EducationFRIENDS OF THE THO…NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $1,300 · HealthNATIONAL …CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $450 · HealthCYSTIC FI…AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN — $450 · HealthAMYOTROPH…American Heart Association Inc — $314 · HealthAmerican …SAMARITAN'S PURSE — $2,000 · ReligionMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $1,500 · InternationalConejo Valley Multisport Masters — $1,250 · Recreation & SportsHAWAII TROPICAL BOTANICAL GARDEN — $435 · EnvironmentDALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC — $341 · Environment
Other$16,583Education$4,650Health$2,514Religion$2,000International$1,500Recreation & Sports$1,250Environment$776

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $4,150 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $1,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $1,300 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetConejo Valley Multisport Masters — $1,250 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDisabled American Veterans — $700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE THOUSAND OAKS LIBRARY — $500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKONA HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $450 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN — $450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII TROPICAL BOTANICAL GARDEN — $435 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC — $341 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $314 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $240 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA BARBARA ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY
  • Who funds Conejo Valley Multisport Masters
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC
  • Who funds Disabled American Veterans
  • Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE THOUSAND OAKS LIBRARY
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds KONA HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN
  • Who funds HAWAII TROPICAL BOTANICAL GARDEN
  • Who funds DALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds SANTA BARBARA ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Defenders of Freedom
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Smalling Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph