Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Shelby and Frederick Gans Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$600k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$4.0MFood & Nutrition$1.0MEducation$670kHealth$340kSocial Science$294kHuman Services$180kReligion$106kYouth Development$105kOther$0
02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $259k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $776k
  • $250k+1 grant · $600k
$25,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$318k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAN FRANCISCO BALLET$600,000
EDIBLE SCHOOLYARD PROJECT$200,000
MEALS ON WHEELS OF SAN FRANCISCO$100,900
MARK MORRIS DANCE GROUP$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY BERKELEY FOUNDATION$75,000
SAN FRANCISCO SPCA$50,500
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY BANCROFT LIBRARY$50,000
UC REGENTS$50,000
CROWDEN MUSIC CENTER$50,000
CRYSTAL BRIDGES MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART$50,000
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTE COOPER HEWITT DESIGN MUSEUM$50,000
CONGREGATION EMANU-EL$30,000
UCSF FOUNDATION CARDIOLOGY$25,000
ALONZO KING LINES BALLET$25,000
LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
OH
CT
CA
CO
VA
KS
AR
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.5M · 34 repeat orgs$531k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

34 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
24

Total granted

$6.5M
$496k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+30%

Still filing today

65%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationSocial ScienceYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION
    7× · 2017–2025 · $941k · revenue +37%
  • TE
    The Edible Schoolyard Project dba The Alice Waters Institute
    7× · 2018–2025 · $722k · revenue +189%
  • SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $711k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $150k
  • UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -21%
  • TA
    THE ASPEN INSTITUTE SOCIETY OF FELLOWS
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Francisco Jazz Organization

The san francisco jazz organization (the organization) is a recognized international leader in jazz creation, presentation, and education. the organization explores the full spectrum of jazz, from the music's origins in the african…

Arts & Culture
2
San Jose Museum of Art Association

Nurture empathy and connection by engaging communities with socially relevant contemporary art

Arts & Culture
3
California Institute of Contemporary Art
—
4
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Inc

Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…

Arts & Culture
5
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
6
Philadelphia Museum of Art

The philadelphia museum of art - in partnership with the city, the region, and art museums around the globe - seeks to preserve, enhance, interpret, and extend the reach of its great collection in particular, and the visual arts in…

Arts & Culture
7
San Francisco Opera Association

We believe opera is a uniquely compelling, entertaining and emotionally thrilling art form. our mission is to bring together growing audiences to experience opera's transformative power.

Arts & Culture
8
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
9
Munson-Williams-Proctor Arts Institute

Munson-williams-proctor arts institute (mwpai) is a fine arts center dedicated to serving diverse audiences by advancing the appreciation, understanding, and enjoyment of the arts. the art institute aims to promote interest and…

Arts & Culture
10
Manhattan School of Music

Manhattan school of music is deeply committed to excellence in education, performance, and creative activity; to the humanity of the school's environment; and to the cultural enrichment of the larger community. a premiere international…

Arts & Culture
11
The Contemporary Jewish Museum

The contemporary jewish museum (the cjm) makes the diversity of the jewish experience relevant for a twenty-first-century audience through innovative exhibitions and programs that educate, challenge, and inspire.

Arts & Culture
12
Museum of Modern Art

The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The American Federation of Arts Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Edible Schoolyard Project dba the Alice Waters Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/36
Grantees still filing
25/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION: $940,700 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATIONSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $711,433 · Arts & CultureSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTIONDISCALCED INC: $587,633 · Arts & CultureDISCALCED INCCrystal Bridges-Museum of American Art Inc: $392,500 · Arts & CultureCrystal Bridges-Museum of American Art IncALONZO KING LINES BALLET: $230,000 · Arts & CultureALONZO KING LINES BALLET+13 more: $390,010 · Arts & Culture+13 moreThe Crowden Music Center: $335,000 · OtherThe Crowden Music CenterUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY BANCROFT LIBRARY: $255,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY BAN…MEALS ON WHEELS OF SAN FRANCISCO INC: $241,900 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS OF SAN FRANCISCO INCUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $215,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY BER…UCSF FOUNDATION CARDIOLOGY: $205,000 · OtherUCSF FOUNDATION CARDIOLOGYIndividual grant recipient: $175,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $150,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTE COOPER HEWITT DESIGN MUSEUM: $150,000 · OtherSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTE COOPER HEWITT D…CONGREGATION EMANUEL: $105,000 · OtherUC REGENTS: $90,000 · Other+24 more: $440,125 · Other+24 moreThe Edible Schoolyard Project dba The Alice Waters Institute: $721,900 · EducationThe Edible Schoo…CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $200,000 · EducationCASE WESTERN RES…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EducationThe Charlie Cart Project: $38,500 · Education+3 more: $45,000 · EducationTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $228,500 · Social ScienceEXPERIENCE CAMPS: $105,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE SAN FRANCISCO SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $75,500 · AnimalsTHE BAKER INSTITUTE FOR CHILDREN WITH HEARING LOSS: $15,000 · Health
Arts & Culture$3,252,276Other$2,362,025Education$1,055,400Social Science$228,500Youth Development$105,000Animals$75,500Health$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION: $940,700 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetThe Edible Schoolyard Project dba The Alice Waters Institute: $721,900 over 7y, 5.6% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $711,433 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDISCALCED INC: $587,633 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetCrystal Bridges-Museum of American Art Inc: $392,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetThe Crowden Music Center: $335,000 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF SAN FRANCISCO INC: $241,900 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetALONZO KING LINES BALLET: $230,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $228,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $200,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEXPERIENCE CAMPS: $105,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetPBS FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $94,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $85,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SAN FRANCISCO SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $75,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS: $53,860 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Charlie Cart Project: $38,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTHE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NY INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BAKER INSTITUTE FOR CHILDREN WITH HEARING LOSS: $15,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetTHE FURNITURE SOCIETY: $15,000 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO HOST COMMITTEE: $14,800 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetTHE OLANA PARTNERSHIP: $12,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYEAR UP INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA COLLEGE OF THE ARTS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Frick Collection: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY MUSIC CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFROM THE TOP INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKITCHEN SISTERS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF ARTS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTTABLE INC: $225 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds The Edible Schoolyard Project dba The Alice Waters Institute ↗
  • Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds DISCALCED INC ↗
  • Who funds Crystal Bridges-Museum of American Art Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Crowden Music Center ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF SAN FRANCISCO INC ↗
  • Who funds ALONZO KING LINES BALLET ↗
  • Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds EXPERIENCE CAMPS ↗
  • Who funds PBS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds THE SAN FRANCISCO SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds CORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Charlie Cart Project ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & SonomaCA17× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Impactassetsinc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Shelby and Frederick Gans Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Shelby and Frederick Gans Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • From the Top Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Year Up Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Shelby and Frederick Gans Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Shelby and Frederick Gans Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Shelby and Frederick Gans’ filings →

More from the funding graph