Skip to content
The Sandra and Howard Tytel Family Charitable Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Sandra and Howard Tytel Family Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$17k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$162kHealth$98kEducation$39kReligion$37kArts & Culture$33kRecreation & Sports$25kEnvironment$15kScience & Tech$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$50k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$5,000
FRIENDS ACADEMY$5,000
LONG ISLAND UNIVERSITY - TILLES CENTER$2,500
COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY$2,500
TEMPLE BETH EL$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SID JACOBSON JCC: $1k → 6%SID JACOBSON JCC: $150 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$346k · 13 repeat orgs$78k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
17

Total granted

$346k
$70k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+12%

Still filing today

69%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationInternationalEnvironmentArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FA
    FRIENDS ACADEMY
    5× · 2018–2024 · $35k · revenue +12%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT RUTH INC
    4× · 2017–2022 · $14k · revenue +228%
  • OW
    Old Westbury Gardens Inc
    3× · 2017–2022 · $8k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • TB
    The Bridge Golf Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +91%
  • TP
    TILLES PERFORMING ARTS
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
  • NY
    NEW YORK RESTORATION PROJECT
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
2
North Shore University Hospital

North shore university hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…

Health
3
South Shore University Hospital

South shore university hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…

Health
4
Lenox Hill Hospital

Lenox hill hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future generations…

Health
5
Staten Island University Hospital

Staten island university hospital is an affiliate within northwell health, inc. ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the…

Health
6
Northern Westchester Hospital Association

Northern westchester hospital association is an affiliate within northwell health, inc. ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care;…

Health
7
Northwell Healthcare Inc

Northwell healthcare inc. coordinates policy making and strategic planning by providing advisory and administrative support services to affiliated health care organizations within northwell health; whose mission is to improve the health of…

Health
8
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Huntington Hospital Association

Huntington hospital association's ("hospital") mission is to provide a full range of inpatient, outpatient and specialized healthcare services, regardless of a patient's ability to pay, within an environment nurtured by respect and safety.…

Health
11
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America; the most unlike its peers is Dancing Dreams. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MEDSHARE INTERNATIONAL INC: $148,000 · InternationalMEDSHARE INTERNATIONAL INCAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT RUTH INC: $13,500 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT RUTH INCNORTHWELL HEALTH INC: $83,225 · Community ImprovementNORTHWELL HEALTH INCTEMPLE EMANU-EL: $27,800 · OtherTEMPLE EMANU-ELTILLES PERFORMING ARTS: $15,000 · OtherTILLES PERFORMING ARTSTEMPLE BETH EL: $9,000 · OtherTEMPLE BETH ELOld Westbury Gardens Inc: $8,000 · OtherOld Westbury Gardens IncIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipie…COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY: $7,500 · OtherCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABOR…DANCING DREAMS: $4,000 · Other+13 more: $15,270 · Other+13 moreFRIENDS ACADEMY: $34,700 · EducationFRIENDS AC…HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY: $2,500 · EducationHOFSTRA UN…+2 more: $2,000 · EducationThe Bridge Golf Foundation: $25,000 · Youth Development+1 more: $500 · Youth DevelopmentNEW YORK RESTORATION PROJECT: $10,000 · EnvironmentTHE NORTH SHORE LAND ALLIANCE INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentAmerican Heart Association Inc: $8,000 · Health
International$161,500Community Improvement$83,225Other$91,570Education$39,200Youth Development$25,500Environment$15,000Health$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEDSHARE INTERNATIONAL INC: $148,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS ACADEMY: $34,700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Bridge Golf Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT RUTH INC: $13,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetNEW YORK RESTORATION PROJECT: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOld Westbury Gardens Inc: $8,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NORTH SHORE LAND ALLIANCE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDANCING DREAMS: $4,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetHOFSTRA UNIVERSITY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINCARNATION CHILDREN'S CENTER: $1,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSID JACOBSON JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $1,150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetABRAHAM JOSHUA HESCHEL SCHOOL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LITTLE ORCHESTRA SOCIETYORPHEON INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetADELPHI UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundThe Goldman Sachs Cha…National Philanthropi…Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Jewish Communal FundNY15.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Sandra and Howard Tytel Family Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Sandra and Howard Tytel Family Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sandra and Howard Tytel Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home