Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Sandra and Howard Tytel Family Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$17k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0182% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172024.

International$162kCommunity Improvement$83kEducation$39kYouth Development$26kEnvironment$15kHealth$8kScience & Tech$8kArts & Culture$5kHuman Services$1kOther$78k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$50k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$5,000
FRIENDS ACADEMY$5,000
LONG ISLAND UNIVERSITY - TILLES CENTER$2,500
COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY$2,500
TEMPLE BETH EL$1,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SID JACOBSON JCC: $1k → 6%SID JACOBSON JCC: $150 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$346k · 13 repeat orgs$78k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +12% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
17

Total granted

$346k
$70k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+12%

Still filing today

69%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationInternationalEnvironmentArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FA
    FRIENDS ACADEMY
    5× · 2018–2024 · $35k · revenue +12%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT RUTH INC
    4× · 2017–2022 · $14k · revenue +228%
  • OW
    Old Westbury Gardens Inc
    3× · 2017–2022 · $8k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • TB
    The Bridge Golf Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +91%
  • TP
    TILLES PERFORMING ARTS
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
  • NY
    NEW YORK RESTORATION PROJECT
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -3%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
2
North Shore University Hospital

North shore university hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…

Health
3
South Shore University Hospital

South shore university hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…

Health
4
Lenox Hill Hospital

Lenox hill hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future generations…

Health
5
Staten Island University Hospital

Staten island university hospital is an affiliate within northwell health, inc. ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the…

Health
6
Northern Westchester Hospital Association

Northern westchester hospital association is an affiliate within northwell health, inc. ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care;…

Health
7
Northwell Healthcare Inc

Northwell healthcare inc. coordinates policy making and strategic planning by providing advisory and administrative support services to affiliated health care organizations within northwell health; whose mission is to improve the health of…

Health
8
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Huntington Hospital Association

Huntington hospital association's ("hospital") mission is to provide a full range of inpatient, outpatient and specialized healthcare services, regardless of a patient's ability to pay, within an environment nurtured by respect and safety.…

Health
11
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America and the most unlike its peers is Dancing Dreams. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%5%<5yr15%0%5–10yr21%14%10–20yr18%27%20–35yr12%18%35–55yr13%36%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr21%11%10–20yr18%65%20–35yr12%10%35–55yr13%15%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/22
the rest of the field
13%
6,744/53,762

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MEDSHARE INTERNATIONAL INC — $148,000 · InternationalMEDSHARE INTERNATIONAL INCAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT RUTH INC — $13,500 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT RUTH INCNORTHWELL HEALTH INC — $83,225 · Community ImprovementNORTHWELL HEALTH INCTEMPLE EMANU-EL — $27,800 · OtherTEMPLE EMANU-ELTILLES PERFORMING ARTS — $15,000 · OtherTILLES PERFORMING ARTSTEMPLE BETH EL — $9,000 · OtherTEMPLE BETH ELOld Westbury Gardens Inc — $8,000 · OtherOld Westbury Gardens IncIndividual grant recipient — $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipie…COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY — $7,500 · OtherCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABOR…DANCING DREAMS — $4,000 · Other+13 more — $15,270 · Other+13 moreFRIENDS ACADEMY — $34,700 · EducationFRIENDS AC…HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY — $2,500 · EducationHOFSTRA UN…+2 more — $2,000 · EducationThe Bridge Golf Foundation — $25,000 · Youth Development+1 more — $500 · Youth DevelopmentNEW YORK RESTORATION PROJECT — $10,000 · EnvironmentTHE NORTH SHORE LAND ALLIANCE INC — $5,000 · EnvironmentAmerican Heart Association Inc — $8,000 · Health
International$161,500Community Improvement$83,225Other$91,570Education$39,200Youth Development$25,500Environment$15,000Health$8,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMEDSHARE INTERNATIONAL INC — $148,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS ACADEMY — $34,700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Bridge Golf Foundation — $25,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT RUTH INC — $13,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetNEW YORK RESTORATION PROJECT — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOld Westbury Gardens Inc — $8,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY — $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NORTH SHORE LAND ALLIANCE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDANCING DREAMS — $4,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetHOFSTRA UNIVERSITY — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINCARNATION CHILDREN'S CENTER — $1,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSID JACOBSON JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER — $1,150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetADELPHI UNIVERSITY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LITTLE ORCHESTRA SOCIETYORPHEON INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetABRAHAM JOSHUA HESCHEL SCHOOL — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY15.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Sandra and Howard Tytel Family Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph