· Private foundation
The Samaritan Project Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k18 grants · $470k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $380k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FOUNDATION FOR HIS MINISTRY | $75,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $70,000 |
| TURLOCK PREGNANCY CENTER | $70,000 |
| CAMANO CHAPEL (PINE RIDGE) | $65,000 |
| WESTSIDE MINISTRIES | $50,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $50,000 |
| URBAN LIFESOURCE CONNECTION | $45,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $40,000 |
| XHOPE | $30,000 |
| COALITION TO ABOLISH SLAVERY AND TRAFFICKING | $30,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $25,000 |
| TURLOCK GOSPEL MISSION | $25,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $25,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $25,000 |
| FAITH COMES BY HEARING | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 62% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 9% of The Samaritan Project Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
34 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $330k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TPTURLOCK PREGNANCY CENTER8× · 2017–2024 · $555k · revenue +111%
- LWLife Without Limbs5× · 2019–2023 · $416k · revenue +56%
- ULURBAN LIFESOURCE CONNECTION7× · 2018–2024 · $380k · revenue +27% · 35% of their budget
Funded once
- FSFIRST STEP DUI & RECOVERY SUPPORT SERVICES INCone grant, 2022 · $25k
- MMARCone grant, 2017 · $25k
- OCO C INTERNATIONAL INCone grant, 2023 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…
To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades
Religious Purposes
Religious
To preach the gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ to the Nations
Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ
Since 1816, american bible society has been fulfilling its mission of making the bible available to every person in a language and format each can understand and afford so all people may experience its life-changing message.
Jubal band ministries mission is to invite people to become disciples of christian life with jesus.
To reach 300 million Russian and Ukrainian speaking people over 100 different nationalities throughout the world with the Gospel of Jesus Christ through television and internet broadcasts, through conferences and evangelical outreach and…
This church will be that place of emergency where people can come any time of day or night. We will be a place that will lead people back to health both spiritually and naturally.
Missionary support ministry to pastors and missionaries in Africa and India. We encouraging and uplifting them with spiritual and devotional teachings of Jesus using the internet. Partners in winning souls for the Kingdom of God.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tomorrow Clubs International and the most unlike its peers is Coalition to Abolish Slavery & Trafficking. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TURLOCK PREGNANCY CENTER ↗
- Who funds Life Without Limbs ↗
- Who funds URBAN LIFESOURCE CONNECTION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS INC ↗
- Who funds Harvest Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds PRODIGAL SONS & DAUGHTERS INC ↗
- Who funds SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND ↗
- Who funds MODESTO GOSPEL MISSION ↗
- Who funds SPEAKING LOUDER MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds JONI AND FRIENDS ↗
- Who funds TURLOCK GOSPEL MISSION ↗
- Who funds ADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE USA ↗
- Who funds LES FELDICK MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds X Hope Inc ↗
- Who funds SONSHINE BIBLE CLUBS ↗
- Who funds COALITION TO ABOLISH SLAVERY & TRAFFICKING ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · Legacy Health Endowment · Stanislaus Community Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Samaritan Project Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Samaritan Project Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Samaritan Project Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.