Loading…
· Private foundation
LEGACY HEALTH ENDOWMENT
Funding healthcare facilities and clinics in providing direct health care services and access thereto, including wellness programs, health research, health education, and public/private partnerships formed to improve health to the residents in the emanuel medical center's service area.
$1.4M
Granted FY2025
33
Grants
1
Communities
$170k
Largest
01What you fund
0174% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2025.
Health$14MHuman Services$931kPhilanthropy$253kHousing & Shelter$215kYouth Development$155kReligion$145kCivil Rights$10kOther$5.3M
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2019
transitionalprovisionhomelesschildren
2020
proceeds improvingdisabled childrenaidincreaseprovision mentalstanislausurgent
2021
mealssaidopharmacy expansionoutreachextensionwestsidecovid
2022
student startingstarting multimulti commitmenthazel tele-healthtele-health tele-behaviorallhehire
2023
specialty clinicmanagementsalvation armycsus nursesamaritanstransportationphysicals
2024
women'suninsured patientsin-patientrecruitment retentionretention providersproviders staffaddressing food
2025
practitioner psychiatricpsychiatric certificateworkerpilotucsf neurologyscholarship acceleratedaccelerated nursing
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2025 · 33 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k9 grants · $44k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $289k
- $50k–250k12 grants · $1.1M
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$62M
Total assets
Largest grants
- COMMUNITY HOSPICE$170,000
- AMRITPAL SINGH$102,331
- COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS OF AMERICA$100,000
- LIVINGSTON COMMUNITY HEALTH$100,000
- GOLDEN VALLEY HEALTH CENTERS$100,000
- LIVINGSTON COMMUNITY HEALTH$96,396
- ALLISON GOMEZ$84,969
- COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS OF AMERICA$76,000
- COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS OF AMERICA$73,200
- COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS OF AMERICA$60,000
- THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO$55,000
- COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS OF AMERICA$50,000
- ALMA SANDOVAL-CARO$46,093
- HAYLEE AGUEDA$45,771
- TAYLOR THOMAS$44,513
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $921k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
05
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 7% of LEGACY HEALTH ENDOWMENT’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 98% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 91% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
LEGACY HEALTH ENDOWMENTlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient addressRecipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$18M · 33 repeat orgs$2.9M to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +65% since the first grant, against +35% for the ones you funded once.
33 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
33
46
Total granted
$18M
$2.7M
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+65%
+35%
Still filing today
36%
35%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $230k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyReligionOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
LIVINGSTON COMMUNITY HEALTH8× · 2018–2025 · $5.8M · revenue +65%- CHCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS OF AMERICA7× · 2019–2025 · $4.3M · revenue +11946% · 32% of their budget
- GVGOLDEN VALLEY HEALTH CENTERS8× · 2018–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +95%
Funded once
- FBFIRST BEHAVIORAL HEALTH URGENT CAREone grant, 2020 · $500k
- CACOVENANTCARE AT HOMEone grant, 2018 · $210k · revenue -7%
- VCVALLEY CHILDREN'S HEALTHCAREgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $175k · revenue +35%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Complete Care Community Health Center I
The organization is devoted to serving the medical needs of the underprivileged of california.
Health
2
Valley Family Health Care Inc
Community health services that provide high quality, patient-centered health care services to satisfy the primary care needs of our community members, and to assure access to care for all.
Health
3
Valley Health Team Inc
VHT's mission is to provide accessible comprehensive, quality primary health care and additional services to the people in the communities we serve in a culturally and linguistically appropriate manner regardless of ability to pay.
Health
4
Christian Healthcare Centers Inc
Christian Healthcare Centers provides affordable, quality and comprehensive healthcare services to the body of Christ and the community.
Health
5
Valley Professionals Community Health
Valley professionals community health center provides comprehensive-integrated health care for all individuals and families, while promoting educational opportunities.
Health
6
Universal Community Health Center
The organization provides quality and accessible health care to underserved communities and a patient centered model of care to empower communities towards wellness.
Health
7
Community Health Center of
To provide our diverse community with access to high quality, affordable primary health care
Health
8
Axis Community Health Inc
The mission of Axis Community Health is to provide quality, affordable, accessible, and compassionate health care services that promote the well being of all members of the community.
Health
9
Community Health Systems Inc
Our mission is to provide health and social services that will promote comfort, healing, and prevention of illnesses and injuries. our services are culturally competent and sensitive, community oriented, and provided regardless of income.
Health
10
Christian Community Health Services
To provide medical services to the underprivileged.
Health
11
Community Health Center of Central
To maintain a high quality patient care delivery system that provides access to comprehensive health care services, regardless of ability to pay.
Health
12
Chc Creating Healthier Communities
Chc exists to empower people to take action to improve health and wellbeing.
—
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Human Services and the most unlike its peers is Emc Health Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 11% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
Closures · last 5 years
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
orgs you fund
0.0%0/33
the rest of the field
11%
330/3,115
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
06the grantee network
29 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
22/29
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Health$13,774,394Other$5,307,178Human Services$930,500Philanthropy$253,000Housing & Shelter$215,000Youth Development$155,000Religion$145,000Civil Rights$10,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LIVINGSTON COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds GOLDEN VALLEY HEALTH CENTERS ↗
- Who funds CASTLE FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds SIERRA VISTA CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds UNITED SAMARITANS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HOSPICE ↗
- Who funds COVENANTCARE AT HOME ↗
- Who funds VALLEY CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE ↗
- Who funds CAMP TAYLOR INC ↗
- Who funds PRODIGAL SONS AND DAUGHTERS ↗
- Who funds TURLOCK PREGNANCY CENTER ↗
- Who funds JESSICA'S HOUSE ↗
- Who funds CREATIVE ALTERNATIVES ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Stanislaus Community FoundationCA32.8× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Stanislaus Community Foundation · Emc Health Foundation · Covenant Ministries of Benevolence · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Sutter Valley Hospitals · United Way of Stanislaus County · The Antone and Marie Raymus Foundation · Sunlight Giving · Public Health Institute · Mary Stuart Rogers Foundation · Teichert Foundation · California Physicians' Service Fdn
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation LEGACY HEALTH ENDOWMENT funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: PRODIGAL SONS AND DAUGHTERS.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
high risk
~1 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 770497027 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on PRODIGAL SONS AND DAUGHTERS, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 73% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Legacy Health Endowment?
Find your warmest path to Legacy Health Endowment through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines